System Card [pdf]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www-cdn.anthropic.com&#x2F;d00db56fa754a1b115b6dd7cb2e3c342ee809620.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www-cdn.anthropic.com&#x2F;d00db56fa754a1b115b6dd7cb2e3c3...</a>

Claude Fable 5

macOS Container Machines

German ruling declares Google liable for false answers in AI Overviews

Building an HTML-first site doubled our users overnight

Upcoming breaking changes for npm v12

Mercedes‑Benz starts large‑scale production of electric axial flux motor

Chrome is looking to permanently drop MV2 extension

&gt; For Fable 5, Mythos 5, and future models on Bedrock with similar or higher capability levels, Anthropic will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models. Retaining data for a limited period allows Anthropic to detect patterns of misuse that are not visible from a single exchange. Once you opt into data retention, your data will leave AWS’s data and security boundary.From the announcement here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;aws&#x2F;anthropic-claude-fable-5-on-aws-mythos-class-capabilities-with-built-in-safeguards-now-available&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;aws&#x2F;anthropic-claude-fable-5-on...</a>&gt; After 30 days, the data is deleted automatically, except in the rare cases where it&#x27;s part of a safety investigation or we&#x27;re legally required to keep it.From: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.claude.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;15425996-data-retention-practices-for-mythos-class-models" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.claude.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;15425996-data-retenti...</a>

AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

Hey gang, you may remember me from such books as _The Lean Startup_ and _The Startup Way_.It&#x27;s been fifteen years since I wrote The Lean Startup, and in that time I&#x27;ve seen some things. In both big companies and tiny startups, NGOs and governments, in almost every industry you can name.I&#x27;ve helped a lot of people create a lot of amazing companies, but I&#x27;ve also seen so many ways this can go wrong. There&#x27;s a darkness in our industry that we often don&#x27;t talk about.I kept watching good companies drift away from the missions they were founded on. Not because anyone woke up one day and decided to be evil, but because the structure they were built on slowly pulled them there. I call that pull &quot;financial gravity.&quot;We&#x27;ve all experienced watching a company we love or admire be warped and broken beyond recognition; until it&#x27;s a husk of its former self, or worse. I wanted to understand why. And I wanted to know what all of us can do to stop that from happening.My new book _Incorruptible_ is my attempt to explain the invisible forces that shape organizations, and how a handful of companies (like Costco, Patagonia, and Novo Nordisk) have successfully been structured to resist gravity and thrive for decades -- or even centuries.Along the way, I founded the Long-Term Stock Exchange, co-founded an AI R&amp;D lab called Answer.AI with Jeremy Howard, and helped a number of notable companies with their governance (yes, including Anthropic).I won&#x27;t pretend I have this all figured out, but I&#x27;ve probably spent more time than is healthy on the &quot;why do good companies go bad&quot; question. Ask me anything!

I'm Eric Ries (The Lean Startup) and Author of New Book "Incorruptible" - AMA

PgDog is funded and coming to a database near you

Reviving Papers with Code

I Hate (Most) Keyboard 'Fn' Keys

US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%

Buy a train, bridge or tracks from the Swiss Railway

All 9,300 Japanese train station, animated by the year it opened (1872–2026)

The large companies I’ve worked at (including FAANG) seemed to thrive on kudos via performative actions. Like the majority of the team is doing useless stuff that management thinks is impressive while the couple all stars get the team closer to the goal.Meanwhile, a lot of managers calendars are purely just 1:1s with devs on the team which clearly has very little value add to the team.Anyone else notice this? Not sure if there’s a word for it, but it’s somewhat demoralising working with a bunch of corporate office workers cosplaying as engineers

HN