HN

Comments (128)

• Menu

  spiantino
  I don't think you can treat owners of the same shares differently in the way this is suggesting. The VC shareholders and the employee shareholders are probably on equal footing and getting the same price. VCs will own preferred but I doubt that is enough to windfall them at the expense of the common shareholders.So if VCs are getting paid a certain share price, employees with vested stock almost certainly are getting the same price. And probably employees with vested options can either exercise now or will just get paid the net during the transaction.Yes, the company is probably doomed so people staying there are not doing well, but they also just got paid a 3x premium on their vested equity.
• Menu

  websiteapi
  I wonder how the startup scene will adjust to this if it becomes mainstream. can employee contracts be modified to force compensation even in this case? seems difficult to write one up without weird second order effects.if this does end up being something that is legal and successfully circumvents anti trust, does it mean antitrust actually is a failure in practice?2026 hasn't even begun and more shenanigans are in flight.
• dang
  Related:Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46379183 - Dec 2025 (400 comments)Nvidia just paid $20B for a company that missed its revenue target by 75% - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403041 - Dec 2025 (133 comments)
• FL33TW00D
  Mr Kwok already analysed these deals and gave them a nice little acronym: HALOhttps://kwokchain.com/2025/07/15/the-halo-effect/
• Menu

  jimnotgym
  IANAL, and am especially weak on US law, but I suspect this is only an antitrust loophole if the administration chooses not to act. Substance over form must apply? Pretty sure this wouldn't fly in European law.
• Menu

  LarsDu88
  So many companies doing non-"acquisitions" during this AI boom! Though this one is at least more comprehensive than say, Google simply hiring back Noam Shazeer from Character.AI or OpenAI taking Windsurf
• Menu

  CalChris
  What is keeping Google/Amazon/Microsoft from licensing Groq’s tech? Sans people to be sure but at substantially reduced price. The Groq Cloud people should owe no allegiance to Ross.BTW, the FA says Nvidia bought the patents. That’s probably an overstatement. Grow said non-exclusive licensing and Nvidia hasn’t said anything.I think Nvidia licensed the IP and ‘bought’ (handcuffed) the people.
• Menu

  whatevertrevor
  > Groq built the region's largest inference cluster in eight days in December 2024. From that Dammam facility, GroqCloud serves "nearly four billion people regionally adjacent to the KSA." This isn't API access. This is critical AI infrastructure for a nation-state, funded by the Public Investment Fund, processing inference workloads at national scale.Maybe I'm just completely out of touch, and hardware has never been my expertise, but does it take O(days) and not O(years) to build data centers these days? I know Grok DCs in Memphis were built under a year cutting many corners and using plenty loopholes, but even by those standards, bringing up a full data center in just over a week sounds impossible without some insane construction automation to me.
• Menu

  georgeburdell
  This behavior is extremely damaging to the startup scene. Who would join a startup these days unless it’s run by a close friend or relative? At least in that case, the scorned junior employees would have social recourse.
• Menu

  atif089
  > GroqCloud will wind down over 12-18 months. They'll either get laid off or jump ship to wherever they can land. They built the LPU architecture, contributed to the compiler stack, supported the infrastructure, and got nothing while Chamath made $2B.This is depressing.
• Menu

  vineethy
  I think it's important to note that there's nothing forbidding LPU style determinism from being used in training. They just didn't make that choice.Also tenstorrent could be a viable challenger in this space. It seems to me that their NoC and their chips could be mostly deterministic as long as you don't start adding in branches
• Menu

  krupan
  Read the article and where it talks about accelerated vesting of Groq shares for both the leadership team that goes to Nvidia and the regular employees that stay at Groq. Is that even guaranteed? It's not an IPO or an acquisition, so why would vesting schedules change?
• kccqzy
  > The "non-exclusive" label is legal fiction. When you acquire all the IP and hire everyone who knows how to use it, exclusivity doesn't matter.I have some doubts about this point. IP is IP, independent of the people who invented it. If a different hardware company were to also pay for a non-exclusive IP license, maybe it will just take a few months to catch up. It’s like inheriting a codebase written by another team, and there will be some pain and some time needed to integrate it.In fact if GroqCloud wishes to survive, it should very well just attract licensees for its IP and collect license fees for the foreseeable future.
• grensley
  A la carte in AI is going to be the name of the game for a couple reasons:- Avoids regulatory scrutiny (for now at least)- Nobody is actually entrenched enough for customers to matter- Weird "celebrity" culture in tech, and AI especially. Everyone is looking for a "whisperer" or a "godfather" or whatever.- Investors still get paid outSmart operational talent will probably adapt by demanding higher salary, signing bonuses, severance packages in lieu of equity. Distribution of the true "lottery tickets" will get more uneven.
• chongli
  I'd like to call back to yesterday's discussion on IP law [1] sparked by recent comments from Rob Pike.There was a major thread on the issue of regulatory regimes and the dysfunction that can arise. How is this acquisition not a textbook example of said dysfunction? This non-acquisition acquisition does not happen at all in a world without IP law.I think we're seeing a culmination of the dysfunction that results from IP law. The sheer amount of capital has given unbelievable momentum to the forces of consolidation. I still can't foresee the endgame (who can?) but it's even harder to see how it'll turn out well.[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46396075
• Menu

  pjb88
  So... What will the actual impact on groq services be?I'm a fan, and I use Groq a lot for systems I build. I think they offer something different to most other providers (cheaper, faster, and until recently "we don't store your data by default") and it will be sad to see that fade.
• Menu

  paxys
  This has nothing to do with antitrust. Not like the current administration is going to enforce it anyways. Nvidia simply wants Groq’s tech and leadership without the burden of 500+ employees.
• Havoc
  I wonder how much of the cap table knewMatthew Berman (youtuber) mentioned he's invested in groq and found out same time as everyone else. Guessing he's a small/indirect investor but still telling
• jbs789
  Feels like a frenzy! To me, the willingness to spend 20bn for a different architecture speaks to the competition in the market, across the big players, which doesn’t seem to be factored into their valuations.
• pton_xd
  So I guess this talent hire + tech license is the new way to acquire startups? Chatacter.ai, Windsurf, and now Groq.Any employees of those companies lurking here? I'm curious how the morale is now.
• Menu

  yalogin
  Nvidia bought groq? I am out of the loop but what does groq have that they want?
• peter_d_sherman
  >"The question isn't just why Nvidia paid $13.1B more than market rate for technology they could build themselves (they have the PDK, volume, talent, infrastructure, and cash). The question is why they structured it this way.Where the premium was spent:Regulatory arbitrage:Non-exclusive licensing avoids years of antitrust review. Structure the deal as IP licensing + talent acquisition, and regulators have no grounds to block it.This alone is worth billions in time and certainty."Isn't that fascinating!Observation: For any given Deal (in business or in life in general) -- there may be one or more legal components -- to it...But (equal-and-oppositely!) there also may NOT be one or more legal components to it!What each deal has in some legal components -- it may lack in other legal components...Conversely, what each deal does not have in some legal components -- it may have in other legal components...Now, perhaps this may sound like a "self-evident truth", and as such, apparently may not be worthy of a deeper exploration, but it seems that there exists an:Intersection of Set Theory and Legal Aspects -- applied to Deals(AKA "Transactions", "Exchanges", "Barters", "Trades", "Exchanges Of Value", etc., etc.) in various jurisdictions (which can be thought about as how contracts, both legal and natural, arising from such exchanges are, or would be interpreted through its courts, through its regional statutes (aka "Laws") IF there are inter-party disputes which subsequently require a court for such interpretation...)And that intersection -- could well be worthy of further study!Phrased another way -- it (and this article!) are highly interesting from a legal perspective!(And also a Set Theory / Set Theoretical one!)
• Menu

  monkeydust
  Also worth thinking a about the private equity market scene, groq was afaik tradable be it thinn liquidity on platforms like equityzen. What did those shareholders get?
• esaym
  >Timing it for Christmas Eve ensures minimal media scrutiny of these connections.Sounds like the media is truly the one in charge.
• Menu

  ossa-ma
  No shade but most other coverage will focus on whether this signals an AI bubble. That's missing the story.Nvidia explicitly did NOT acquire Groq. They licensed the IP and hired the talent. This structure dodges CFIUS review (Groq had $1.5B in Saudi government contracts), antitrust scrutiny, and years of regulatory delays.The $13B premium over the September valuation was the cost of regulatory arbitrage. Announced Christmas Eve while Trump's AI Czar (Chamath's All-In podcast co-host) is in office. Chamath's Social Capital made AT LEAST ~$2B on this exit.My article breaks down: what Nvidia actually bought vs what they left behind, why the deal structure matters, who got paid, and the political connections nobody's talking about.
• jandrese
  nVidia's big problem right now is they have more money than they can productively spend and are way down the stupid money hole just looking for any kind of return. This is a failure of capitalism.
• Menu

  dangus
  The part I don’t fully understand is: could this non-acquisition eventually make the deal less than ideal for Nvidia?Is it really a given that GroqCloud is going to be sunset and the company will die?Couldn’t this company hire talent and continue to operate and maybe even innovate? Couldn’t Groq even hire back some employees from Nvidia? If any of them live in California there’s nothing stopping them and they have a bunch of cash from Nvidia. There are all kinds of loopholes for that like contracting arrangements.Nvidia doesn’t really have exclusive access to any part of the company. They didn’t necessarily remove a competitor, though I’ll grant that they likely did in practice.It’s potentially possible that the regulations did their job and kept a competitor on the market, though again I imagine this is my naevity speaking and that the most likely outcome is that Groq will wither.I also don’t fully understand if the Saudis are getting cashed out or not. Are they really going to roll over and allow their Saudi AI data center to become worthless? I would think they have a lot of motivation after this deal to make sure Groq still operates and serves their goals.
• ChrisArchitect
  Related:Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cashhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46379183
• Menu

  cubefox
  > Most production AI applications aren't running 405B models. They're running 7B-70B models that need low latency and high throughput.Really? At least for LLMs, most actual usage is concentrated on huge SOTA models. 1 trillion parameters or more. And LLMs seem to be the lion's share of AI compute demand.
• anita_
  [dead]
• LogicFailsMe
  [flagged]
• nextworddev
  [dead]
• Menu

  jgalt212
  [flagged]
• camillomiller
  The chatgpt-ism and the gpt section headlines make this piece immediately unreadable. Why do you outsource your own blog’s thoughts to a machine? Terrible.