Need help?
<- Back

Comments (44)

  • yassi_dev
    I've built an official website for this project here: https://djangocontrolroom.com/I think that explains some of the value for this project a bit better
  • ashwindharne
    Looks great -- always wished the admin panel came with more configurable bells and whistles. I've been exploring Quarkus recently (https://quarkus.io/), and it has a Dev UI with a similar extensible "panels" pattern. It's a bit different than Django since it's not for running in prod, but nonetheless it's pretty helpful.sort of a tangent, but quarkus also has a concept of "dev services" that are monitorable via the dev UI. It uses Testcontainers to start and autowire runtime deps (postgres, redis, keycloak, etc.). Pretty pleasant experience to get the whole stack spun up and observable alongside the dev server.
  • nehalem
    I like this a lot. What I would love to see is a panel to run management commands and see their output. Would be great in services like Google Cloud Run where you cannot access a shell anymore like you could on Heroku.
  • simonw
    I like the way each panel is its own separate package on PyPI and the system picks them up via setuptools entry points. It's a neat implementation of a plugin pattern.
  • giancarlostoro
    Django Admin definitely needs extensions like this. I hope someday they make it a stronger more capable Admin UI. Their own docs if I remember correctly tell you to build your own UI if you're hitting limits with the admin UI itself, which is fine, but there's so much OOTB that works nicely for the admin UI.I like the spirit of this, and could see Django heavy shops wanting to add bits and pieces that display tooling / services they care about in Django admin.
  • blorenz
    I love the sentiment and ambition in this! The Django admin is a core reason why I still choose Django over other solutions. I tell my team that the Django admin CRUD is our backstop when we encounter issues in our frontend UI. Thank you for tooling it out more!
  • jnpnj
    Lovely. I wonder how many people did similar things in their own django instances because the lack of embedded monitor is often a source of friction.
  • drchaim
    Good idea. If you add a kind of skill/prompt you’ll get a lot of other components from the community ;)
  • butterlettuce
    Tell your parents i said thank you for making you exist.
  • greenie_beans
    love this!! thanks for sharing. this might help me a lot.
  • johsole
    Nice work.
  • dec0dedab0de
    i like it, but I think i would rather have a proxy, or atleast an auth redirect to those different tools.I used to have flower at myapp.com/flower using an auth redirect in nginx to a simple view in django that made sure it was an admin user. I think if you can make that setup easier to leverage existing tools that would be nicer than rebuilding everything.
  • izzie1234
    I love this idea. I see the AI era having 2 competing views when building something new:1. Build X with pure <language of choice>. Why? LLMs will have less context needed, and onboarding engineers would be easier since there’ll be less overhead and opinionated frameworks knowledge required2. Build X using well establish frameworks. Painful in the beginning since you’ll not only need language knowledge, but framework knowledge. The upshot, is scaling and maintainabilityI love that this ecosystem will heavily pressure teams to consider (2) more and more — solving the very real “AI slop” problem
  • HFerrahoglu
    looks good.
  • dzonga
    this is pretty dope
  • rick1290
    love it
  • raphaelmolly8
    [dead]
  • raphaelmolly8
    [dead]
  • genie3io
    [dead]
  • FEELmyAGI
    [flagged]