HN

Need help?
<- Back
/e/OS is a complete "deGoogled", mobile ecosystem

/e/OS is a complete "deGoogled", mobile ecosystem

doener

Comments (249)

  • goldenarm
    Tweaking user-hostile OSes into user-friendly ones is impressive, but not sustainable. Even worse, it slowing us down from leaving Android entirely.Look at the AdBlocker crackdown of Google Chrome. Every single chrome-fork has shut down MV2 extensions, even Brave is about to do it, because it is impossible to maintain features that complex on a browser that Google spends >$1B/year to develop.Same story for /e/ and GrapheneOS, the day Google pulls the plug on source code releases, god knows how long they will last. We should focus our efforts on truly open platforms.
  • odeckmyn
    I wanted to add a perspective from actual daily use, because a lot of this thread sounds theoretical.I’ve been using a Murena/Fairphone running /e/OS as my primary phone for a while now, and honestly the experience has been much smoother than I expected. My banking apps work, GPS/navigation works reliably, messaging and everyday apps behave normally — I’m not constantly fighting the device or giving things up. After the initial setup, it just feels like a normal smartphone, except noticeably quieter in terms of tracking and background noise.What surprised me most is that this isn’t a “privacy experiment” anymore. It’s a usable, stable daily driver. I still get the convenience people worry about losing, but with far fewer ties to Google services by default.I think a lot of people hesitate because they assume moving away from stock Android means breaking essential apps or living with constant friction. That hasn’t been my experience at all. If you’re curious but unsure, it’s genuinely worth trying — the barrier is much lower than it used to be, and you might find you don’t miss as much as you expect.
  • fransje26
    The irony of advertising a privacy-enabled de-googled system, and then telling me that my Firefox browser is not support, and that I should use Edge, Opera or Chrome instead....Browsing:https://e.foundation/installer/Reply:https://imgur.com/a/al1Q9DM
  • lpcvoid
    There's absolutely no reason to use /e/ when GrapheneOS exists.https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
  • JCattheATM
    What advantages does /e/OS offer over installing LineageOS without Gapps, which is a necessary step you must explicitly take if you want them?
  • HunOL
    I'm currently looking for a new Android phone. I don't like the Pixel and deep integration with Google. I looked at the Fairphone with /e/OS and the Pixel with GrapheneOS, but unfortunately there's no certainty that everything will work or where the boundary is between Google Android and "clean" Android. For example, it turned out that Android Auto is essentially Google Auto and I don't what find out what is dependent on Google. I want something that just works. A phone isn't something I want to tinker with like Linux ten years ago. So basically the choice comes down to Samsung and Chinese brands.
  • soufron
    Well E/OS is mainly about privacy. And about getting rid of Google. And it works. To me that's more important and it's a better vision.
  • hl0dwig
    As an average user, I don't understand all the ins and outs of an Android system, but I'm very happy to use /e/OS on my Fairphone 4 every day. I don't have a Google account, but I can still use all the apps I need, including French banking apps (CMB, Endenred+).My only regret is that the simplified installation tool didn't work (my FP4 kept restarting), so I had to install it manually, which makes it inaccessible to users who are even less tech-savvy than me.Finally, I still think it's an excellent alternative to Android, but we need to go further and allow our smartphones to work with other operating systems, particularly Linux. I am hopeful that one day we will have a Linux OS for our smartphones that performs as well as /e/OS (I have heard about Jolla smartphones and Sailfish OS, but unfortunately I have not tested them).
  • eMPee584
    PostmarketOS is a complete degoogled mobile ecosystem, actually. How about we commit resources into that?
  • lich_king
    I love this project, it's my preferred way to log into Gmail.
  • ralferoo
    Honestly, I don't quite understand this.I get the appeal of degoogling, but this seems to just be replacing that with alternatives run by another commercial company, just one I've never heard of before.Why does it even need "One account for your privacy" ... "Operated by Murena, your Murena Workspace account @murena.io is at the centre of the ecosystem" when it'd be even better to have everything on-device without an account at all.Even more, Murena seems to be owned by Qwant who seem to be in the business of selling a search engine, and while they currently claim to be all about user privacy, this is basically exactly how Google started nearly 30 years ago.I wonder if they'd be happy if, for instance, somebody took this system and debundled Murena and switched it to using duckduckgo. Would they embrace that too, or sue them into oblivion?EDIT: maybe I was too hasty. I've just seen that it's open source and it seems like you can self-host the required cloud parts: https://gitlab.e.foundation/e/infra/ecloud-selfhosting
  • trelliumD
    I have both a Jolla C2 phone, and an E/Os device, on a nothing CMS1 phone. Both are great. I like the Jolla Phone for its SailfishOS, which has great UI/Ux. I am less enthusiastic about the hardware. (good enough though) The E/OS really is good, all apps work good, and really much is done for privacy protection. But if the hardware is more performant, and with a few extra features i'd still opt for SailfishOS
  • ergocoder
    I worked at Google before, so I trust Google more than these random organizations that claim they are better than Google at handling sensitive info.
  • bluebarbet
    Got a "Your browser is not supported" error for using Firefox on their website (device compatibility page).Very poor first impression.
  • decasteve
    If you block Google, as much of it as possible anyway, on your firewall, does the device work/install? I tried /e/ and Lineage about a year ago, but neither of them worked when Google was blocked completely. The only one that made no requests to Google was Graphene.
  • astrolx
    My phone (Teracube) is running /e/OS now for 2 years. Nearly everything works out of the box (bank apps, e-identity apps etc ..). The only issue I have is that the app I use to take contactless payment on the phone via NFC does not work (while it works using Android).
  • bramhaag
    > open-source means auditable privacyThis is what that auditing actually reveals:* /e/OS sends user speech data to OpenAI without consent [1], and thought this was ok until they got caught [2].* /e/OS massively delays security patches, and calls this a "standard industry practice" [3]. Meanwhile, GrapheneOS' opt-in security preview releases provide early access to security updates prior to official disclosure [4]. Also see [0] (Security update speed) and [7] (WebView being 40 security updates behind).* microG downloads and executes proprietary Google binaries in a privileged environment [5] [6]. You can obviously not audit these, nor should this count as "degoogled".* microG still phones home to Google by default (android.clients.google.com for device registration check-in, mtalk.google.com for FCM push, firebaseinstallations.googleapis.com for SIM activations) [7].[0] has a comparison of popular privacy and security-focused Android-based OS, which paints the whole picture. Privacy-friendly does not necessarily mean secure, but in this case "privacy-friendly" is quite a stretch already.[0] https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm[1] https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114880528716479708[2] https://community.e.foundation/t/clarification-about-voice-t...[3] https://community.e.foundation/t/e-os-and-security-updates/7...[4] https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/27068-grapheneos-security-p...[5] https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/blob/e19a9985204ec8329c1d9...[6] https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/blob/e19a9985204ec8329c1d9...[7] https://www.kuketz-blog.de/e-datenschutzfreundlich-bedeutet-...
  • LorenDB
    For how polished the launcher looks, it's a bit jarring to install /e/ and realize that under the hood, all the apps are just running a very stock Material theme. I'm not shaming the developers; developing a custom theme is no doubt an involved task that they don't have the resources for.
  • mghackerlady
    I've long been a fan of murena. I would likely be using their services if I hadn't discovered disroot :)
  • raphinou
    I have been using e/OS but moved away when an upgrade to the next version required to manually wipe the device. I could cope with the little inconveniences of a degoogled phone, but wiping the device myself following a unclear procedure was too much for me. My phone is not a hacking subject. It's a tool. Still, it worked reasonably well and I would have upgraded and kept using it if the upgrade had been easier.
  • IX-103
    So we replace an OS owned by a search engine (Google) with an OS owned by a search engine (Murena)? You're going to need to give me more details than that before I consider switching.
  • purkka
    I wonder how this compares to GrapheneOS in practice.>Operated by Murena, your Murena Workspace account @murena.io is at the centre of the ecosystem, allowing to store, back up and retrieve your data safely on remote servers.This sounds like their version is somewhat married to Murena. While probably better than Google, still not independent.They're also advertising features such as "hiding your IP address [...] when you feel like it" – which sounds a lot like a VPN – without mentioning much about who the traffic is going through or how they might log it.
  • scosman
    Why rip off Apple design so much here (see homescreen image). Seems like a lot of unnecessary effort. Plus it’s not done well enough so instead of looking like itself, it looks like a bad ripoff.
  • madeofpalk
    Why is this a complete graphical clone of (old version) iOS?This seems like the worst of both worlds.
  • amaccuish
    But can't relock the bootloader on a Pixel 9 since it is "community supported" :(
  • geff82
    How is the experience in practice? What works, what doesn't? Are updates prompt and regular?
  • amelius
    I don't like names that are difficult to google.But then again, maybe that's the point :)
  • janmarsal
    Not that it matters but I just noticed certain titles on their website can be edited. For example the text "Use our /e/OS Installer" can be modified and I noticed it because I accidentally pasted my clipboard there. I suppose contenteditable should be set to "false".fuck me i'm doing work even though i should be working right now
  • anon
    undefined
  • gigatexal
    Is this DOA if major OEMs like Motorola partner with a project like GrapheneOS? https://motorolanews.com/motorola-three-new-b2b-solutions-at...
  • trilogic
    Sir, you just made the world a better place, thank you.
  • jathul
    why is there not any support for latest models of manufacturers, as older models are not for sale now.
  • einpoklum
    At the link, I see a lot of text about a company called Murena. Including:> Operated by Murena, your Murena Workspace account @murena.io is at the > centre of the ecosystem, allowing to store, back up and retrieve your > data safely on remote servers.That seems to suggest that we would be replacing one large overbearing corporation with a smaller and less-evil overbearing corporation. Is e/OS an open-source facade for Murena?
  • anon
    undefined
  • chrisjj
    Nice, but....> a unique privacy enhanced environment.... consider proofreading.
  • octoclaw
    The timing of this post right below the Motorola/GrapheneOS partnership is pretty funny.I've been running /e/OS on a Fairphone for about a year now. The experience is... fine. Not great. App compatibility is the main pain point. Banking apps are hit or miss even with microG. Updates lag behind GrapheneOS significantly.The Murena cloud stuff is the part that bothers me most. You're trading one cloud dependency for another. At least with GrapheneOS you get a clean slate and can choose your own sync solution (Nextcloud, whatever).That said, /e/ supports way more devices than GrapheneOS does. For people who can't or won't buy a Pixel (or now Motorola), it's one of the few options. The real question is whether the Motorola partnership changes the calculus. If GrapheneOS gets proper OEM support, the device limitation argument mostly goes away.
  • huflungdung
    [dead]