HN

Comments (115)

• Menu

  MBCook
  The title buried the lede.> In the five minutes since I started writing this post the website has downloaded almost half a gigabyte of new ads.I’m guessing this is due to autoplaying videos. *500 MB* in 5 minutes.37 MB is petite compared to that.
• Menu

  userbinator
  To use a good point of reference that I've seen others also start using lately, an installation of Windows 95 is roughly 40MB, so in loading that page you've downloaded approximately one Windows 95 installation. Then another 10+ times with the 500MB more that came after.
• Menu

  WarOnPrivacy
  In Firefox + Unlock Origin: Downloads 5.6MB and then stops loading.Scrolling to the bottom of the page added 3MB of images and then stopped loading.
• Menu

  mnkyprskbd
  At this point, if you browse the internet without an adblock; it is on YOU.
• red_hare
  TheVerge launched a full RSS Feed for paid subscribers about a year ago and I've never so happily subscribed to something.
• Menu

  kelvinjps10
  The person who wrote the article and the people in charge of the site are different.
• djoldman
  I can't recommend enough limiting JS to an allowlist.By default, I browse without JS. If I get to a website that I want to explore that requires JS, I turn it on with one click:https://github.com/maximelebreton/quick-javascript-switcher
• elorant
  Thank God for uMatrix. Seriously, I don't know how I lived without that thing. Load times on everything are at least 30% faster.
• umarcyber
  This was the exact motivation that led me to develop my own news feed for a vulnerability dashboard I'm working on. I would wait for my NVD API calls to finish by scrolling tech sites but was always inundated by ads...
• Menu

  jdangu
  To measure network load, open dev tools, uncheck "disable caches" then clear your browser cache then load the page. Screenshot indicates network cache is disabled so the stated number is inflated.
• touwer
  Even more embarassing is that the article adds really nothing to whatever was written before about rss. Probably gobbled up by AI
• Menu

  notepad0x90
  we need some sort of a universal crowd-sourced site rating system. Things like user experience, scamminess, user-hostility, site ownership-affiliations,etc.. all opt-in by users of course, you setup the criteria that is important to you and the browser displays different ratings or blocks certain sites (like scammy/fraudulent ones) out right. The reputation providers would also be selectable like search engines. I'd imagine there would be crowdsourced lists of all sorts.If you have older pepople struggling with cognition for example, this would be a good way to limit their exposure to scams.But commercial sites like this could also be rated as a privacy risk for the intense ad capitalism, or a 'bloat' to tell users it will slow down their computer by visiting the site. You could set it up so that when certain categories and ratings are met, the browser warns you before you could navigate to it.Another idea is to have this same system include alternative suggestions. For example, if a site has age verification, you would be able to setup your browser so that it warns you when you visit sites of that nature, listing alternatives recommended by the list maintainer, for whatever that site provides.
• Menu

  goldenarm
  I'm trying to migrate to 100% RSS right now, to avoid the hateful algorithmic editorialization of modern social media.And I'm shocked that almost no paid media provides full articles in RSS anymore, and force me to navigate their 37MB pages with popups all over the place. Has anyone found a solution against that ?Edit : Sorry I'm asking specifically about paywalled stuff
• Venn1
  It's 3.60 MB with NoScript enabled.
• Menu

  m463
  this just reminds me of...- watching "normal" cable tv- listening to "normal" fm radio- shopping on amazon (sponsored... everything)
• KostblLb
  it's relatively easy for an ai to write such an article now, just open all websites and gather metrics while crawling...
• dailyforge
  wtf is this tittle
• Menu

  simonw
  This is so upsetting. No wonder people spend more time in mobile apps than they do using the mobile web - the default web experience on so many sites is terrible.
• Blikkentrekker
  Well, it's otherwise “free” to read the article so I guess this is how one “pays” in the end.I wonder how this works on mobile data though which is significantlym more expensive than home network data.
• valicord
  I hate ads as much as anyone, but the OP article would be more convincing if it didn't itself include 6MB worth of screenshots.
• WarmWash
  Imagine trying to run an ad supported business to a bunch of people who are avid proponents of ad blocking.Also, thank you to the six people who download those 500MB to keep the site alive for the rest of us.
• hahhhha500012
  [dead]
• Menu

  nslsm
  [flagged]