<- Back
Comments (92)
- jcalvinowensDo you actually own that /48? The problem with using the globally routable addresses internally is that your public /48 might change in the future, and and that will force you to change a bunch of internal stuff.I have my router set up to advertise two /64 prefixes on each LAN subnet: one from fddd:deca:fbad::/56* that I use for all internal communication, and one from 2001:5a8:xxxx:xxxx::/56 that is only used for talking to the internet. Every device I've ever tested supports this configuration flawlessly, including linux/apple/windows laptops, apple/android mobile devices, an IoT vacuum, and a 10+ year old VoIP phone.My router is a Linux PC, so I can configure radvd however I want (no GUI, I just edit the configs over SSH). Maybe home routers won't let you do this.* You're really supposed to pick a random prefix in fd00::/8, but uniqueness only matters if you intend to merge networks with somebody else later, I care more about it being easy to remember.
- tostiFor my own networks I use the private range internally (fd00::/8). That way the addresses remain the same when we move or change the pipe to a bigger one. Also, they can be routed, just not on the Internet. It's easy to join remote networks over wireguard and there's plenty of room for experimentation.
- wolvoleoWhy though? What's the problem with ipv4?I find it much simpler for troubleshooting etc to have simple IPv4 addresses. But cool that it can be done :)I've switched off IPv6 on my router anyway, I haven't yet needed it. My provider didn't offer it last time I checked but when they do enable it I don't want it suddenly popping up against an untested router configuration.
- PaulKeebleI suspect I am going to be running dual stack for at least the next decade, IPv4 switch off feels very far away. I don't think there is much advantage or disadvantage to running IPv4 compared to translation. The current internet doesn't feel ready. I have had less issues with IPv6 this year compared to last so there has been some progress but I am still getting fallbacks to IPv4, some companies don't seem to care much about IPv6 outages currently.
- boredatomsIt looks like an in-kernel replacement for jool is cominghttps://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260319151230.655687-1-ralf@...
- mwexlerFinally. I will now be able to run ~340 undecillion devices on my home network. I'll have the smartest "smart home" on the block.
- victorbjorklundWish I could use ipv6. My ISP doesn’t support it (yea, I know tunnels exists but then it’s just more pain than just using ipv4)
- lucasayIPv6 isn’t that compelling on a simple home network, but avoiding NAT and easier end-to-end connectivity are pretty real advantages.
- para_paroluI can’t understand benefits of having ipv6. The only one is public ips but rest is just headache. In my home network I specify disabled v6 everywhere.
- aap_I'd be so much more interested in ipv6 if ISPs would just hand out a stable prefix. as it is ipv6 makes very little sense to me
- tonymetI attempted a similar effort, and found my router had critical ipv6 vulnerabilities including binding the admin and SSH to the WAN on ipv6 (not on ipv4) , and disabling IPv6 firewall altogether so the LAN services were exposed to the internet.I had the vendor publish their GPL drop, and their upstream vendor did not even have IPv6 support in the product ( the firmware init scripts & admin UI) . So the IPv6 support in the finished product was a rushed copy-paste of IPv4 setup.I encourage full black box testing of your IPv6 setup, as IPv6 is not in the critical path for QA or consumers, so vulns can persist for years.
- mrsssnakeDual stack IPv4+IPv6 is still the easiest, but at least the author learned a lot and it helps finding issues in software.
- rao-vI messed with this at one point and gave up when I realized every device would have a permanent externally addressable IP within a block that is basically linked to me (good luck trying to change your IPv6 /48 every month or whatever you get with consumer IP addresses)It’s probably not a big deal and NAT etc. is no protection but it gave me the heebie jeebies.
- thebeardredis"mostly" (...) "only"