HN

Need help?
<- Back
The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

The EU still wants to scan your private messages and photos

MrBruh

Comments (211)

  • x775
    I am the creator of Fight Chat Control.Thank you for sharing. It is unfortunately, once again, needed.The recent events have been rather dumbfounding. On March 11, the Parliament surprisingly voted to replace blanket mass surveillance with targeted monitoring of suspects following judicial involvement [0]. As Council refused to compromise, the trilogue negotiations were set to fail, thus allowing the Commission's current indiscriminate "Chat Control 1.0" to lapse [1]. This would have been the ideal outcome.In an unprecedented move, the EPP is attempting to force a repeat vote tomorrow, seeking to overturn the otherwise principled March 11 decision and instead favouring indiscriminate mass surveillance [1, 2]. In an attempt to avoid this, the Greens earlier today tried to remove the repeat vote from the agenda tomorrow, but this was voted down [3].As such, tomorrow, the Parliament will once again vote on Chat Control. And unlike March 11, multiple groups are split on the vote, including S&D and Renew. The EPP remains unified in its support for Chat Control. If you are a European citizen, I urge you to contact your MEPs by e-mail and, if you have time, by calling. We really are in the final stretch here and every action counts. I have just updated the website to reflect the votes today, allowing a more targeted approach.Happy to answer any questions.[0] https://mepwatch.eu/10/vote.html?v=188578[1] https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-contro...[2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/OJQ-10-2026-03...[3] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-...
  • derefr
    So... if we all care so much about shooting down the bad idea, why is nobody proposing opposite legislation: a bill enshrining a right to private communications, such that bills like this one would become impossible to even table?Is it just that there's no "privacy lobby" interested in getting even one lawyer around to sit down and write it up?Or is there at least one such bill floating around, but no EU member state has been willing to table it for discussion?
  • Stagnant
    Okay so I had to look in to it because the site is not really doing a good job explaining it at all. Turns out[0] that they are voting for the extension of the temporary regulation thats been in effect since 2021 (Regulation (EU) 2021/1232). So this is about the "voluntary scanning of private communications" (which is still bad, but has been in effect for almost 5 years already).[0]: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sedcms/documents/PRIORITY_INF...
  • kleiba
    If you're ever unsure about whether a proposed EU regulation may be good or bad, just look at whether Hungary supports it: if so, it's bad; if not, it might be good. Egészségére!
  • afh1
    Where are all those "as an EU citizen" commenters? You are but a subject of an ultra-national government whose sole objective is ever increased control over your life and euros.
  • leugim
    So they will pass it until is a yes?
  • elzbardico
    They never quit. They just waited for something else to dominate the news, so they could fly it under the radar. The war started, so, they felt it was now or never.
  • drnick1
    > The "Chat Control" proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos.How would this be enforced in practice? In other words, what would prevent E.U. users from using encrypted services outside of the jurisdiction of the E.U., to "illegally" encrypt their hard drives or to run their own private encrypted comms servers?
  • ZetsuBouKyo
    it's probably best to go with client-side encryption and share keys with friends privately. that pretty much fixes all the privacy issues after the initial registration, but maintaining that extension with all the company and their updates is a bit of a headache.
  • wolvoleo
    Yeah that didn't take long. Of course they keep pushing it. I knew the big 'win' of the 11th was a bit premature and overcelebrated.The dark forces behind all this set to gain a lot of profits once it passes :(
  • foweltschmerz
    This is the same EU that blocks and hinders innovation in the name of privacy?
  • MrBruh
    You can directly call your representatives by looking them up here:https://www.europarl.europa.eu/portal/en
  • Smar
    So EU syill wants to harm children.
  • smeggysmeg
    It can fail 100 times and it won't count, and the one time this surveillance legislation passes it will become law. Thanks EU, nice show of democracy.
  • jacknews
    so much for 'democracy'keep voting until you get the right answerat least EU are voting I suppose. some governments just go ahead and mass-surveil illegally
  • mastermedo
    What does this mean for a non-eu citizen communicating with an eu citizen? Is it as simple as using signal/matrix instead of whatsapp/messenger?
  • Vinnl
    Just a heads up that this is being posted late in the European evening here, so that will affect who's commenting.
  • mnewme
    Fun fact: the parties that want this are actually those who criticise the EU the most
  • baal80spam
    But of course it's back.
  • dokyun
    So much for "digital soverignty".
  • rdevilla
    They should just ask the Americans. If you are not a US citizen you have zero rights, and any old creep in Silicon Valley can riffle through your personal information with impunity.I realize I am just recapitulating the modus operandi of Five Eyes here...
  • jedisct1
    The US doesn't even have to ask, people already give AI providers all their data and full control over all their devices.
  • HelloUsername
    Why's there '?foo=bar' in the URL?
  • anon
    undefined
  • retinaros
    Few days ago we had a guy explaining to us at the top of hn page that we should migrate data to europe. Sometimes I miss the internet of before mass surveillance abd ads everywhere
  • max_
    The lack of accountability after what was exposed in the Epstein files illustrates that not one in power actually care about kids."Save the kids", is just a ploy to run scams.
  • crest
    Let the damn politicans go first and make all their private messages public. Yes everything from boring I'm stuck in traffic honey over nudes to insider trading and lobbying.
  • shevy-java
    They hate us for our freedoms.A shame the EU is just simulation of democracy.Best case in point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar_corruption_scandal_at_th...
  • doener
  • hsuduebc2
    Nice website! Sadly, url stays the same across all coutries. I can't send anyone direct link.
  • hkon
    ofc, they only need to get it approved once. they will try until they succeed
  • hsuduebc2
    I absolutely don't understand how anyone can support this in the context of rising authoritarianism. Even people in my country which are talking about this phenomena support it. I strongly suspect that they do absolutely know shit about why it's problematic.I wonder if they would support that every of paper mail would be opened and checked. I strongly doubt that.
  • elzbardico
    Please, could the bootlickers of the European Union stop downvoting every single criticism of it?Are you so obtuse to be unable to figure out that by being like annoying school marms you are just making people start to pay more attention to the populists?
  • vrganj
    Framing this as the EU's attempt is antieuropean propaganda.It is the Conservatives attempt. The EU parliament is the entity that shot it down last time.
  • dgxyz
    The trick here is to make it impossible to do so.Don’t put your shit in the cloud and use proper E2E secure messaging.For me the entire idea of the cloud is dead due to exposure like this.
  • spwa4
    But don't worry, exceptions for ALL officials are built in. And I do mean ALL officials. In this bill, for example, pedophile gym teachers are perfectly safe from getting scanned.Gym teachers are also the largest group of people convicted for pedophilia. So you can be sure they are keeping their priorities straight. States, and the monopoly telco's are also protected from paying even the tiniest amount of money for companies to do these scans, all costs are entirely offloaded to app developers.So the priorities are clear:1) protecting the state from even the tiniest amount of responsibility, even at the cost of children getting abused2) keeping some 50 foreign states from the same3) keeping a whole list of organizations safe from inspections4) keeping the state safe from actually spending any amount of money on these scans...n) protecting children
  • tjwebbnorfolk
    does this violate GDPR?
  • iam_circuit
    [dead]