<- Back
Comments (156)
- yubainuOpinions on the merits vary, but in this instance, the government's actions were undeniably overbearing and unilateral. It is encouraging to see the judiciary successfully function as a check and balance against such executive overreach.
- dataflowI assume the court case [1] is referring to 10 U.S. Code § 3252 [2]?[1] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379655/134/anthropic-...[2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/3252
- telotortiumJust a district judge, so I’m supposing the Trump administration will file an appeal if they care, and will almost certainly get a preliminary injunction. The Ninth Circuit ruling will be more telling.
- yen223How many of you had to stop using Claude because of the Pentagon edict?
- 0x3fIs the practical outcome much different? I doubt they'll get contracts either way, so the labelling was just a formality.If anything it seems the label was just intended to give a veneer of legitimacy to the admin by using an existing mechanism and terminology, rather than saying "we're going to block your access because we feel like it".
- JohnTHallerSome judicial pushback against authoritarian policies is good to see.
- paulpauperSo much for all that alarmism a month ago. Just got to be patient and wait for cooler heads to prevail. Or it goes to show how Anthropic handled it well, by making their case as persuasively and assertively without delay as they had done.
- pugchat[dead]
- AbrahamParangimeta, but the comment pattern in this thread strongly suggests inorganic support for the government's position.
- chmorgan_[dead]
- felixagentai[flagged]
- bustah[dead]
- inquirerGeneral[dead]
- arrglk34t[flagged]
- arrglk34t[flagged]
- tim4ock[flagged]
- arrglk34t[flagged]
- stainablesteeli think the military should be able to do what it wantslast i checked the german military is held down by stupid obligations forced onto it by its government that make it both inefficient and obsolete
- comrade1234I'm sure the contracts will start rolling in now.
- ljspragueThe Left’s ability to “manufacture procedural outcomes” is fading; everyone sees this for what it is.
- charcircuitWhat's the point of a supply chain risk distinction if you can't mark a company as a risk if they express that they will be a risk?