HN

Comments (77)

• Menu

  PhilippGille
  Is this not just about extra credit? So what's included in the subscription doesn't change - just extra credits are now token based instead of message based? (For Plus/Pro)
• Menu

  mrweasel
  Why not just attach a real dollar amount, rather than using "credits"?Well, I know why. I just wanted to be snarky. It's just that trying to hide the actual price is getting a bit old. Just tell me that generating this much code will cost me $10.
• Menu

  __mharrison__
  For the past month, I've been claiming that $20/mo codex is the best deal in AI.Now I'm going to have to find the new best deal.
• Menu

  Skunkleton
  The title is misleading and not in the article. This change is for business/enterprise accounts. Also, these are still credit based. The change is that credits now operate on tokens like the API rather than on messages as they used to.
• Menu

  fabian2k
  Is this something that is likely to also change the way Github Copilot bills? Right now the billing is message-based, not token-based. And OpenAI and Microsoft are rather opaquely intertwined in the AI space.
• Rastonbury
  So Anthropic bundled CC with Claude.ai cuz OAI bundled chatgpt with Codex, now OAI is unbundling, IPO must be around the corner. Writing is also on the wall for CC usage based subscriptions now that main competitor effectively got rid of it. How are the Chinese models looking?
• Menu

  m-hodges
  The days of subsidized access is rapidly coming to an end.
• Menu

  AstroBen
  Things must be bad if they're doing this before their IPO
• Menu

  supliminal
  Any takes on how Codex compares to Claude? I mostly use it to run ahead, document, investigate and prep the actual implementation for Claude.Gemini burned me too many times but maybe the situation has improved since.
• flufluflufluffy
  wouldn’t it be “usage based pricing” not “pricing based usage”
• Menu

  adamtaylor_13
  Sounds like a death knell to me.If I recall correctly, Ed Zitron noted in a recent article that one of the horsemen of his AI-pocalypse would be price hikes from providers.
• anuramat
  from what they wrote, they're just changing how they measure the usage; might even be a good thing if you manage your context right:> This format replaces average per-message estimates for your plan with a direct mapping between token usage and credits. It is most useful when you want a clearer view of how input, cached input, and output affect credit consumption.
• alkonaut
  Not only do I not keep up with the tech itself, I don’t even keep up with how to pay for it.
• Menu

  convexly
  This pricing only really makes sense if the users can predict their usage, if not people that use this heavily are just going to be hamstrung and are going to start rationing their usage.
• adi_kurian
  Makes sense. Right now the subscriptions are like Uber as I remember it in NYC in 2014.
• anon
  undefined
• jamesu
  The current pricing model (for plus) feels deliberately confusing to me, I can never really tell if I'm nearing any kind of limit with my account since nothing really seems to tell me.
• Menu

  kvanbeek
  So migrate to gemini now?
• Menu

  gigatexal
  good. just like the Claude model. getting the pricing to be in line with costs is the only way this remains sustainable.
• Menu

  SilverElfin
  Does this mean there’s no such thing as a “subscription” to ChatGPT for businesses? I thought they offered businesses a subscription with some amount of built in quota previously, including for the side products like codex and sora.
• aplomb1026
  [dead]
• hackermeows
  [dead]
• rdli
  [dead]