HN

Comments (108)

• Menu

  joshwarwick15
  (Caveat I’m the founder of https://wassist.app - The WhatsApp Agent Platform)Please be very careful using this tool to automate your WhatsApp - if you send too many messages, too quickly, you are going to get banned.This is NOT an officially supported api by WhatsApp and the risk of ban is relatively high
• Menu

  faangguyindia
  I just use telegram.Just yesterday I setup a bot which is easy via botfatherAnd also, setup an app (claude built it but I had to fiddle with it, it works like pagerduty) but uses cloudflate worker to push downtime/errors (via fcm) in production (from graphana) via webhooks to "full screen, by pass dnd, alerts, with loud music, this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0IQBWWabuU )I named the app "Siren".It's not straightforward to have durable hard to miss alerts about your production enviornment but good thing is this doesn't cost a cent.Telegram group alerts are from my teammates (small team 3 members) via bot.And Siren is for only me as I am responsible for the backend with 10 microservices, centralized logging via graphana, alloy, loki, and for metrics Prometheus.It's all working reasonably well for me, this makes your life so much better as you fix the issues before they turn into nightmare.
• Menu

  zarzavat
  Beware that if this does not use a real web browser then it's likely to get your whatsapp account suspended. Don't use it with any account you care about, you will lose all your data.Hell, I got my whatsapp account suspended (appealed and reversed) just for using the official web client too soon after creating a new account.
• Menu

  BoppreH
  I wish it mentioned how safe this is. Some years ago I got banned for just logging in with a third-party client, without sending any messages. Given how critical WhatsApp is for some people, and how permanent the bans are, that's a big risk.
• Menu

  recsv-heredoc
  This is such a sorely needed point of integration. Cool to see Peter still shipping tools. It’s such a pity meta refuses to play ball like Telegram.Either they’ll double-down and make this even harder -or- hopefully realise that WhatsApp is likely to be a really common control plane for AI systems in the next few years. Let’s hope the Llama energy strikes and it’s the latter.How does WhatsMeow compare with Baileys?
• jillesvangurp
  Cool.I spun up a self hosted matrix server a few days ago using codex, docker compose, and ansible. Stupidly easy to do now. I'm running it in Hetzner on a 3.99 euro/month vm. It backs up every few hours to a bucket and I have a few integrity scripts to monitor the backups actually happen. I did that because I was getting a bit frustrated with the flaky integration with Whatsapp and Slack in openclaw. I had it up and running in half an hour with only minimal prompting.Whatsapp kind of works but you end up chatting with yourself and then open claw posts messages as you. Not ideal. You can't easily create new users (or bot users) in Whatsapp. It probably has some kind of bot api of course but I did not explore that much.I never quite managed to get Slack working with open claw. I tried for a few hours. I think the Slack team is asleep at the wheel snoozing through this whole AI thing. If somebody there is still paying attention to things like this, maybe make some noise internally. Anyway, they made it stupidly hard to do anything productive via their APIs. The UI for managing permissions is a disgraceful hell of complexity. Add permission. UI freezes for fifteen seconds. Reloads automatically. Unfreezes. Add the next. And whatever you do, there's always one more permission you forgot. *end rant*Relative to Whatsapp and Slack, Matrix is stupidly easy to integrate with open claw, codex, or whatever. We're retiring Slack now as I see uses for agent driven chat bots everywhere now and I want to get rid of any kind of friction around bot related plumbing. I have no use for platforms that intentionally cripple that or treat as a toll booth.With Matrix, you just create a bot user manually or via an API. Set a password, get an access token and do whatever. No API limits. No faff with QR codes. No permission hell (Slack). It just works. Well documented API. End to end encryption. Etc. Create as many bot users as you need. Nobody is bean counting API calls, numbers of users, etc. Refreshingly easy.Other OSS messaging platforms are available of course. I do not have a strong opinion as to which is better yet. But now I want a Matrix cli that can do admin, message sending, and all the rest. Probably already exists. But if it doesn't I might end up generating one. Macli might be a good name.
• sixhobbits
  I'd be curious to know how many numbers were burned/banned during the development of this library
• whilenot-dev
  OT#1, but I don't endorse the editorial choice to put the name of the "original" author in the submission title.OT#2: Is it typical to put a package.json in a go project as replacement for a {Make,Just}file?
• Menu

  mentalgear
  Reading a lot about people getting banned here for not using the official client, but doesn't Whatsapp have to be interoperable now (at least in the EU due to new legislation) ?At least Whatsapp itself shows ad banners that you can now connect other messaging clients into Whatsapp, so it should be normal that other clients can equally access Whatsapp.
• Menu

  nkzd
  What is the best way to get a throwaway phone number to try this? Is it possible to get one online?
• saberience
  As someone that's written some apps using official WA for Business accounts, I would strongly advise against any 3rd party tools for automating WA.Whatsapp has some really stringent requirements on any kind of automation. E.g. Not messaging anyone automatically unless they messaged you with 24 hours, in fact, this is explicitly blocked if you use Meta's API. You have to use message templates in this case.Also, any bots need to be verified with Meta etc.And the TOS has gotten more strict recently, not less strict. So buyer beware here, Meta is really protective over reverse engineering WA protocol or automating it, so you can easily get yourself blocked or banned here.
• andberx
  The offline search with FTS5 is really nice. I have years of WhatsApp history and searching for anything in the app is painfully slow. Being able to just grep through everything locally would be a huge upgrade.How far back does the backfill actually go? Does it pull your full history from the primary device or is there some limit?
• intheitmines
  The lifting/interfacing with whatsapp is handled by https://github.com/tulir/whatsmeow
• Menu

  e7h4nz
  If AI agents can proficiently use whatsapp I would assume that two-thirds of the people chatting with me in my contacts are actually just bots messaging me.
• exitb
  It strikes me as odd that we've got so many agent harnesses, orchestrators, sandboxes, yet no one made a communicator for AIs yet.
• Menu

  asim
  I don't know why in 2026 I'm still surprised CLIs are taking off. But here's the difference today. It's for real world end user platforms like WhatsApp and Claude. That's the difference. Previously it was only Dev and infrastructure focused. Today we're saying you know what, I need programmatic access to this real world thing. It's fascinating because I rarely open my laptop now or try not to.Who are these people using the cli?
• eisbaw
  Matrix
• anon
  undefined
• e7h4nz
  [dead]
• superfa
  [dead]
• Menu

  m00dy
  for some reason, I don't like this guy.