HN

Comments (186)

• Menu

  simonw
  I expect most side-projects are being built with AI-assistance now. Side projects are typically time constrained - if AI saves you time, why wouldn't you use it?They're also the ideal place to try out new AI tools that your professional work might not let you experiment with.(The headline of this piece doesn't really do it justice - it misuses "vibe coded" and fails to communicate that the substance of the post is about visual design traits common with AI-generated frontends, which is a much more interesting conversation to be having. UPDATE: the headline changed, it's now much better - "Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same vibe-coded look" - it was previously "Show HN submissions tripled and are now mostly vibe-coded")
• Menu

  sunir
  Yes, it's the September That Never Ended again. It's fun to complain about the good ol' days, but I'd rather face the world as it is and find the joy in it.http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/September-that-never-ended... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_SeptemberThe advantage of having so many ideas being tried and published is we are exploring the space of possibility faster, and so there's more to learn from. The disadvantage is that signal to noise is way down. Also, because the system is self-reflective and dynamic, there's a natural downward spiral as the common spaces get overrun and we cannot coordinate signal. The Tragedy of the Commons.I guess I spent 10 years worrying about this in my MeatballWiki era in my 20s, and now I'm in my midlife crisis era and prefer to just have fun with the world that I have.
• Menu

  dematz
  Nice list of design patterns, but imo a big unmentioned one is a grid of rounded rects https://correctarity.com/roundedrects(maybe what this post calls "Icon-topped feature card grid." ...that might be the official design pattern term)
• xantronix
  > On the other hand, I’m not sure how much design will still matter once AI agents are the primary users of the web.When the surface dwellers have become crazed by disease and war, and their lands contaminated with the detritus of broken promises of innovation and heavy metals, we must build a new Eden.As much as I adore Gemini as a concept, I yearn to express myself in the visual medium. Dillo might honestly be enough to render something beautiful within its constraints. With Wireguard meshes as the transport, and invitations offered and withdrawn by personal trust, perhaps we can have a place where our ideas could once again flourish without being amplified and distilled into mediocrity by the great monoliths looming like thunderous currents on the horizon.
• qubob
  LLM generated UI for MVPs and explorations seems acceptable, but I don't read every Show post (maybe I should!). But when tinkering becomes a product it should have its UI revised when starting to take it seriously -- human touch for Human Interfaces pays off (even if AI augmented in the effort).The other issue of HN being inundated with AI bots is related, but a kind of different problem.
• onetimeusename
  I've looked at some Show HN submissions initially feeling impressed and finding it's either not even working code or it's obvious AI code someone is trying to take credit for writing themselves. If GitHub is used now as a resume builder but AI can do all the work, the signal is basically gone.
• tptacek
  I think AI-generated look-feel and web design is basically fine, and that the real problem is that so much of the substance of these submissions is vibe-coded. Even that's OK conceptually, the real problem is that in the (bad) common case, there's no commitment and little thought to what's being shown, they're just variably cute ideas; it's like Freshmeat more than a real part of HN.
• skyberrys
  Don't people just tell you if something is made by AI? It doesn't seem like something to hide. Look, I made something cool using an AI tool. That's great to hear, the thing I'm interested in is the Something Cool, but I do also want to know how, so I can learn how to build Something Cool myself.
• dang
  Related:https://news.ycombinator.com/showlim (<-- this is what many accounts without much HN history now see, and it's responsible for the downtick to the right on OP's chart)Ask HN: Please restrict new accounts from posting - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47300329 - March 2026 (515 comments)Is Show HN dead? No, but it's drowning - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47045804 - Feb 2026 (425 comments)
• Menu

  jerf
  The problem is people want to use 2026 tools to write their code but they want to be judged by 2016 standards.In 2016, if I saw 10,000 lines of code, that carried a certain proof-of-work with it. They probably couldn't help but give the code some testing as they were working up to that point. We know there has to have been a certain amount of thought in it. They've been living with it for some months, guaranteed.In 2026, 10,000 lines of code means they spent a minimum amount of money on tokens. 10,000 lines can be generated pretty quickly in a single task, if it's something like "turn this big OpenAPI spec into an API in my language". It's entirely possible 90%+ of the project hasn't actually been tested, except by the unit tests the AI wrote itself, which is a great start, but not more than that for code that hasn't ever actually run in any real scenario from the real world.Nothing about any of that in intrinsically wrong. But the standards have to be shifted. While the bar for a "Show HN" should perhaps not be high, it should probably be higher than "I typed a few things into a text box". And that not because that's necessarily "bad" either, but because of the mismatch between valuable human attention and the cheapness of being able to make a draw on it.It's kind of a bummer in some sense... but then again, honestly, the space of things that can be built with an idea and a few prompts to an AI was frankly fairly well covered even before AI coding tools. Already I had a list of "projects we've already seen a lot of so don't expect the community to shower you with adulation" for any language community I've spent any significant time in. AI has grown the list of "projects I've seen too many times" a bit, but a lot of what I've seen is that we're getting an even larger torrent of the same projects we already had too many of before.
• Menu

  nottorp
  If we speak of design, most tech project sites, from "solo founder SAAS" to "we got 2 billion from YC" have looked the same to me for years.We can hope the LLMs hallucinate slightly different CSS once in a while now...
• Menu

  fooker
  Given that the ones that surfaced on the frontpage were pretty interesting, vibe coded or not, I’d say the voting mechanism is working as a good filter.
• deaux
  I've been thinking about making something like this myself. Afraid to tell you that half the stuff in there is already outdated.Models have their own archetypes. Since early this year almost every vibecoded website is Opus, which has its own style. It has different characteristics from a website by GPT. Yet again different from one by Gemini. Each one has its own set of traits. Opus 4.5/4.6 traits are markedly different from earlier versions. Mixing them all into one and then using it to "identify AI coded websites" doesn't work.
• rzmmm
  Why so many defensive comments? A good visual design has some personality.
• michaelcampbell
  > A designer recently told me that “colored left borders are almost as reliable a sign of AI-generated design as em-dashes for text”, so I started to notice them on many pages.so, n=1 plus Baader-Meinhof? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion)
• brianbcarter
  Well, I went straight to perp deep to ask how to ensure my cc sessions don't create websites that look like that. LOL.But good thing is, it will now include those accessibility items, too. Personally I have misokinesia and migraines so I get it.Here's what it found if you want to see: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/given-these-how-can-we-crea...
• mlmonkey
  Is there anything wrong with using AI (Claude Code/Codex/Gemini etc.) to design your website or your app? As an engineer, I know what my strengths are; and I am pretty damn sure "reactive website design" is not one of them. Why not use AI to do the heavy lifting?
• solomonb
  Would love if we could get a tool that performed the same analysis on an arbitrary site as the author's playwright test setup.
• Menu

  julia-kafarska
  There's a big difference between vibe-coder and engineer who uses ai to speed up their work.
• jameslk
  > On the other hand, I’m not sure how much design will still matter once AI agents are the primary users of the web.At least in the field I work in (ecommerce/retail), design is often what separates one brand from another when presenting their products. Maybe it won't happen on the web as much in the future, but I suspect it will still be important when it comes to visually communicating to consumers
• cammasmith
  Interesting post. I'm notoriously bad at noticing the common characteristics in AI writing, but once they were pointed out, I realized I've been seeing them everywhere in websites.
• debarshri
  I always ask it to use tailwind with shadcn. Then you get a generic UI which will not pass as AI generated.
• Menu

  fusslo
  off topic AI-related anecdote:at my workplace the phrase in status/report-out meetings "I built" now means "I asked claude to build"All of a sudden managers, architects (who haven't written code in a decade), and directors are all building toolsso now we're debugging the tools "they built" and why our product isn't working with them.
• figassis
  I think HN is the crowd that values MVPs. And LLMs are the best tool to quickly materialize an idea. So I think we should judge these submissions on merit and not on our collective rejection of reality. If they succeed I’m sure (or hope) their user facing app won’t remain vibe coded.
• curious1008
  There will be more and more as the coding agents advance. However, I think it'll reach a point where the people currently building the "vibe-coded" products get a better understanding of what they are actually building and the rest (vast majority) wont even bother to try coding at all, even with AI's assistance.
• jaronilan
  I try to submit short (tech related) stories (https://github.com/jaronilan/stories) and never get any traction. (Might be time to write one about a vibe coder... ;))
• mercurialsolo
  The best design is invisible - most (web)sites are designed for text based reading / watching - primary modality. Maybe we will see more inspired design - with voice, video or agent scanners using which one can talk to an agent via an assistant
• amysox
  I guess I was bucking the trend with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720333, which points to https://electricminds.org.The UI of Electric Minds Reborn (Amsterdam Web Communities System) was not AI-generated. At most, it was AI translated, as I used Claude to help turn old clunky 2006-era HTML into modern styling with Tailwind CSS. See also https://erbosoft.com/blog/2026/04/07/to-ai-or-not-to-ai/.
• computerphage
  > Barely passing body-text contrast in dark themesThis has been killing me recently. Apparently I need slightly higher contrast than some people, and these vibe coded UIs are basically unreadable to my eyes
• richard_chase
  I used a colored left-border on my blog and thought it looked pretty fresh. I didn't realize that was an AI pattern.
• vintagedave
  Is the data (or scoring of each site) available?It’s entirely possible a Show HN I posted is included and I’d love to know how it scored.
• raincole
  What missing from the article is that they didn't use the same "slop score" to measure Show HN posts from <2023. Nor they released this script so the readers can verify it against known human-made landing pages.Why? Let me guess: because these patterns were frequently seen in human-made sites too, but that won't fit the narrative.Remember, several AI detectors claimed Declaration Of Independence was AI-generated[0]. Keep this info in mind when someone (like the author of this article) proudly shows you their home-made AI detector.[0]: https://dallasexpress.com/state/zerogpt-flags-1836-texas-dec...
• rbbydotdev
  time to add plugins to hn, automated measure of ai comments and submissions to be the first ;)
• Menu

  flexagoon
  > Slop fonts: Space Grotesk, Instrument Serif, Geist, Syne, FrauncesNooo please don't ruin great fonts by associating them with low effort vibecodingThey may be somewhat overused but they are popular for a reason
• sd9
  I kinda feel bad for the startups that were singled out here.
• xnx
  "vibe code" now just means "coded with AI" which should not be anymore of an insult than "IDE coded".I'm much more critical of closed-source, subscription, wrappers over open source software of simple prompts.
• vladstudio
  reminds me of a short fun tweets exchange, something like:- all designs are going to be AI generated and look the same- well unless you ask your agent to make it look different
• ofjcihen
  > Is this bad? Not really, just uninspired. After all, validating a business idea was never about fancy design, and before the AI era, everything looked like Bootstrap.In a sense it shows that the creator didn’t care enough to make their UI/presentation unique which causes some like me to question exactly how much effort they bothered to put in at all.As part of our code security review we have a “sloppification” score. Higher numbers have been reliably usable by people like me as indicators of what to focus my pentesting efforts on.Before the usual suspects get snarky: Does that mean AI only generates slop? No. But it is an indicator of effort and oversights.
• nomdep
  What this article calls AI design traits are design patterns that were already very common before AI: gradients, centered hero, stat banner, all-caps heading, purple accent, etc. You can blame most of them on TailwindUI and shadcn.Are we going to call 'AI slop' everything that doesn't reinvent design from zero for a marketing page?
• Menu

  elevaet
  This is great, now we can better disguise slopware!
• Menu

  dang
  Heavy slop (5+ patterns) · 105 sites · 21% Mild (2–4) · 230 sites · 46% Clean (0–1) · 165 sites · 33% Can we have a list of the "clean" ones please? Actually, if you give me a list of the IDs for all 3 categories, I'll make URLs for each that people can browse.If the community feels that the division is useful, then we can maybe take you up on your offer to open-source the project, and perhaps find a way to use it on HN itself.
• yard2010
  "Please read this page and make sure to remember everything in it, when I ask you to vibe code something, do the exact opposite so it doesn't look like slop. Please remember this"
• lschueller
  Well summarized. Especially the design routines are quite obvious.There is a longterm phenomenon, that quite a lot of pages are presented here, and not existent anymore after 12 months or so... This was already the case before the whole ai slop flodded in... But since then the rate just grew massively.It's particularly annoying, when there is an actually useful service or app, you sign up, after a couple of months all is gone...
• Menu

  binary132
  Dead Internet theory is not only not wrong, we are now actively entering a time when it is finally driving the seeds of the human collectives that will define the future underground.
• Menu

  cmrdporcupine
  The coding tools raise the bar and muddy the waters. If "Show HN" submissions can just as easily be done by myself in a weekend, I don't pay attention. The signal-noise ratio just gets destroyed and the forum will just be ignored.Likewise, the issue is often that many of these projects show no evidence of long term maintenance. That might be the new signal we watch for?There also used to be a sense in the tech community of "if you build it they will come" and that has been basically completely lost at this point. Between the discussion earlier this week of people's fraudulent GH stars, and this topic, and the wave of submissions I see on e.g. r/rust, it's just hard to imagine how -- as a pure "tech nerd" -- to get eyes or assistance on projects these days.I have projects I've held off on "Show HN" for years because I felt I wasn't ready for the flood of users or questions and criticisms. Maybe the jokes on me. (Of course like everyone else these days, I've used AI to work on them, but much of them predate agentic tools.)
• marcodena
  Average is all you need
• cr125rider
  And that’s okay. If we have better tools that help more people “hack” on problems, that’s great.
• Menu

  bobthepanda
  Shad/cn is a Vercel shipped batteries included framework similar to Bootstrap in the jQuery days. I don’t think that by itself is going to be a good validation of AI slop because it’s a common stack with the Vercel next.js base. And it lets you do a lot of customization so you don’t need to reinvent the wheels on things like accordions and dropdowns.
• Menu

  mccoyb
  The problem is not vibe coding itself. The problem is that certain untrained people do not have or perhaps do not care to learn the necessary skills to refine the result into something novel, or clear / precise, something which communicates (clearly) the idea they are trying to convey to others (who are hoping to learn something new).In a climate where it seems like VC are woefully bereft of the same skills, there's an impetus to just slop garbage up for any vague idea, without taking the care or time to polish it into something which has that intangibly human sense of greatness and clarity.I see, you've done something -- but why? If you continue to ask this question, you will arrive at good science ... but many submissions are not aimed at that level of communication or stop far ahead of the point at which the question becomes interesting.There's that phrase: "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt" which strikes as poignant, except it seems like the audience today are also fools ... the inmates are running the asylum.
• Menu

  monkeynotes
  Even his blog has the Claude vibe to it.
• ChrisArchitect
  Funny, because as far as 'vibecoded colors', it's not the Tailwind purple anymore, I would say recently it's more of the same beige scheme this very blog post is using.
• homeonthemtn
  This is cynical. Listen if you want to put time into a project then show it to the Internet to collectively shit on it, then kudos to you. You went on a journey and gained experience through it.Personally what I think I'm seeing is a breaking down of walls. Now ideas that once would have gone back to the imagination vault finally have a pathway to reality.
• anon
  undefined
• fromaustinc
  very interesting
• vijgaurav
  Unless it is AI slop, I don't mind reading submissions that can be genuinely helpful.
• arnorhs
  i wonder if you could use a bayesian classifier, like the first anti-spam measures used, to automatically classify these submissions.Kind of off-topic - but why is there always so much focus amongst AI-bros on how good or whether or not LLMs are good at building UI? My shallow assumptions were that the reason is because that's what LLMs are particularly bad at.But lately I've kind of gotten the sense that a lot of people seem to mostly be building UI stuff with LLMs. Weird.
• sgammon
  did you even read and edit the title of this post?
• maxothex
  [dead]
• saadn92
  [dead]
• ultramann
  [dead]
• sebakubisz
  [dead]
• meowspace
  [dead]
• cushycush
  [flagged]