HN

Comments (77)

• Menu

  jamie_ca
  I'm buying into this workflow more the more I use it, but the real gamechanger is (a) parallel threads in worktrees, with (b) enough lifecycle hooks to treat them similarly to spinning up a VM.Specifically for me that means that after I create a worktree I get some local config files copied over and Postgres duplicating my local dev and test databases so I can test in isolation, and then when I close out a worktree it deletes those databases.The best at that that I've found is Conductor, but I can't use it at work because we only have Copilot and they're locked to a Claude/Codex backend. Arbor is close, but it's not under as active development and has a lot of rough edges. Opencode GUI has create hooks but not teardown.If Zed can hook that up _and_ also keep its great editor roots, that'll definitely be a game changer.
• Menu

  2001zhaozhao
  It's pretty clear by this point that everyone is going towards parallel agents and worktrees, but TBH I am surprised to see an offering from Zed, seeing how heavy they lean into being editor-heavy and having AI features be strictly optional.The key advantages Zed has are being agent-agnostic (so not a first party UI like Claude/Codex/Cursor Desktop), supporting multiple repositories on the same agent via creating a worktree for each automatically, and having a high quality custom agent UI rather than wrapping over CLIs (I've used their IDE's agent UI in the past and it's great). AFAIK, this is the first mainstream tool that supports all of these features.
• Menu

  Frannky
  I would love to unleash parallel agents, but I am still checking every single edit while enforcing minimal, stateless, modular code, and I have the AI check in with me before writing the next file.A lot of times, I find it has incredibly stupid ideas and tends to make the code very messy. I would love to figure out how to stop that from happening automatically.The upside of checking in on the code, though, is that I can come up with smart directions for the AI from both a product and tech perspective. This is especially helpful when the dumb suggestions add a lot of complexity.I think it's like when a product person asks for a new feature, or when a founder building their own product selects which feature is smarter to build and how.
• conqrr
  Love Zed for my personal projects at home with Openrouter. But I cant use it at work as I'm forced to use claude code at work and find the VSCode+claude code combo better. I know zed has claudecode integration, but I found it to be very weak compared to zedagent+claudemodel. Has this improved?
• Menu

  testfrequency
  Warp launched something similar a week or so ago, but the Zed implementation I find a lot more logical. Will give Zed another try, as I’m overdue for my monthly “maybe I should try this terminal/IDE” itch.
• Menu

  tengbretson
  I really want to like Zed, but for some reason the way it interfaces with the TypeScript language server is dog slow compared to VS Code and its derivatives.
• Menu

  jotato
  Yesterday, I determined to move to Zed because they weren't pushing this stuff :(
• Menu

  giancarlostoro
  Zed is probably the best text editor in the last 10 years. It has quirks, but it is insanely powerful and capable out of the box. I don't even bother trying to setup Neovim because of Zed. They let people for PRs for missing vim features for their vim emulation, and its insanely capable.I hope someday they get the funding they deserve, because it has insane potential. It's why I subscribe to their pay plan, even if I dont use it all the time, I want them to succeed.
• Menu

  verse
  I personally don't love the idea of the default layout pushing aside my code and filetree to make space for AI toolsI really like Zed, I use it every day. But, if I'd seen this layout when I first installed, I never would have taken it seriouslyI imagine this will push some new users away
• danielvaughn
  What I want is a stateful file-writing layer that is aware of all clients (aka agents and humans) and their activity. It provides its own locking mechanisms, and prevents agents from overwriting each others work. That way you could have multiple agents operating on the same codebase, without having to futz with worktrees and all that.
• gherkinnn
  I've used Zed since the very beginning and I remain a fan. Its LLM integration so far has been a lot more pleasant than what I see in others and the editor is perfectly usable without using LLMs.Its multi buffer and speed sound trivial but using anything else feels wrong now.
• Menu

  lfx
  I loved zed for over 1 year, told for everybody to use it, because it was so fast and great.But now using claude-code,gemini-cli,codex,etc it just seems less relevant. Just opened nvim with lazyvim and it feels nice, since I'm in terminal anyway it just feels more natural.Still have zed opened, still like it but I guess honeymoon is over.
• Menu

  alvsilvao
  This is great! I love Zed, but when I came across Superset I stopped using Zed. Maybe no I will go back to it
• sync
  I'm having a hard time adjusting to the Project Panel on the right (and, at least for me, hidden by default) - seems like they're trying to bury the concept of a 'file'?It's certainly interesting though, and I'll give it some time - the post says "It feels more natural once you've spent a little time with it"
• Menu

  subarctic
  I liked the idea of the new layout with the agent thread on the left, it goes hand-in-hand with having multiple threads that are easy to switch between and running concurrently, but I switched back because my file tree disappeared and I couldn't easily see how to add it back
• cdrnsf
  If Cursor is worth $60bn, how much is Zed worth?
• orliesaurus
  I just installed Zed last night and enabled vim mode, can't wait to try this!
• dist-epoch
  Zed might have a fighting chance against VS Code now that it's million extensions are quickly becoming irrelevant since agents do all the coding.What's needed today is a nice way to orchestrate agents and do some small manual edits there and there to the code.
• Menu

  xiej
  Funny how Zed's tagline is Love your editor again Zed is a minimal code editor crafted for speed and collaboration with humans and AI. At home, I don't use any AI when coding, to keep my brain sharp. But it's clear that Zed's focus is on AI integration because that's where the money's going (seriously, where is the setting to have a different ui icon size vs ui font size). Is there any editor still being being developed and focusing on the experience of coding by hand?
• fishgoesblub
  I remember when Zed's main thing was "collaborative" editing. Not as profitable as AI I suppose.
• gaigalas
  I've been a Sublime Text user for years, then a VSCode for years. Been trying Zed for the past couple weeks and it has been a good experience.
• lazzlazzlazz
  I like Zed but the defaults for tabs (CTRL+Tab and CTRL+Shift+Tab step you through some diabolical tab selector in what is allegedly (but not really) recency order instead of just left/right. It really made me question their sanity.
• Menu

  umeshunni
  Does this work with ACP?
• gigatexal
  Becoming more and more useful by teh day. Love to see it.
• thomastraum
  Love Zed.
• submeta
  Is this any different from a setup where I use a terminal with tabs and splits, running my favorite editor in one or more panes, and several agents (Claude Code and Codex) in several other panes and tabs?Edit: Although I can integrate an agent in NeoVim, I don’t do it. I want to use my editor solely for that purpose, while the rest (versioning, agentic coding, git client, etc.) is done in the terminal. My NeoVim setup is simple and fast, which is why I prefer it over any other IDE or editor. Especially with the native package manager in the latest version. I also replaced BBEdit by installing Neovide, a GUI version of NeoVim. It starts in a split second and is incredibly smooth and fast. And it’s so enjoyable to work with that I use it as my preferred frontend to Obsidian.
• chickensong
  [dead]