<- Back
Comments (35)
- shaeAfter decades of dealing with Elsevier, Springer-Verlag and the rest; I hope they all go out of business.
- kspacewalk2The funny thing is, if the guy wasn't quite so greedy with this racket, probably no one would notice. Surely if the number of your publications and citations shoots up exponentially and surpasses those of much more well-known scientists, folks are bound to ask questions. I wonder if this got out of control or whether he really did think it's a good idea to collude his way to such prominence.
- blizdiddyMakes sense. Economics isn’t science, it’s numerology that justifies exploiting workers.
- amarcheschiIt'd be nice to check whether some llms still have "memory" of the paper she has deleted
- mlmonkeyIt will be interesting to see how Goodell's citations drop going forward.
- bpt33 down, thousands to go.This will continue until Elsevier and their 3 or 4 peers are removed from the academic publishing process entirely.
- ArbriTIs it just me or this makes me feel less guilty for using libgen all these years
- fewgrehrehre[flagged]
- anonaaksldraf[flagged]
- ChrisMarshallNYI am not arguing against the facts expressed in the piece. This is not an area in which I have any expertise.However, I am a bit uncomfortable with the pithy language used. It's possible (likely, even), that the fired editors deserve the pithiness, but it's still a bit weird to read that kind of prose, in a scientific context.