<- Back
Comments (31)
- SoftTalkerNice to see some pushback in the most egregious abuses of privacy. I wonder why we are getting this with Flock but not seeing the same with private security cameras such as Ring, pervasive tracking of mobile devices by carriers and apps, and internet browser tracking. Is it just that there's a direct personal benefit with those devices, and people view the trade-off as being worth it?
- gentileThe 100k figure is an overestimate by a few percent. The OpenStreetMap data for ALPRs is pretty good, but there is some duplication. I (recently) programmatically identified ~2.5k such instances. https://pickpj.github.io/Mapping/FIock/similar.html It has openstreetmap links attached for those who want to help fix the data.
- mixmastamykNice work all. But am quite unhappy with their new map. Doesn’t work with my hardened machine with webgl off or my old phone. For some obscure reason, the button to try the “legacy” map (from last month) does not come up most of the time. So several times recently the site has been inaccessible to me.
- amazingamazingFlock could easily get around this by paying people to put them on their own property. Then what?Put energy into legislation. Ring and Nest already do the same thing.https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/07/ring-reveals-they-give...
- alkonautHow is this data storage even legal? I mean having cameras out that will sound an alarm if one of N specific wanted cars pass by is one thing. But do these cars just store stuff for later use and abuse? Who approved that?
- SilverElfinSpeed cameras next. They’re just revenue generators and part of a safetyism Trojan horse for surveillance.
- curiousgalIt's ironic seeing this here since Flock is YCombinator company.
- convolvatronthis is great. I mean I'm all for the argument in the abstract. my commute is 2.5 miles one way, and I get tagged 20 times in each direction. that kind of brings it home.
- kumarskiThe senior director of connectivity there is former IDF.Probably nothing.