HN

Comments (40)

• Menu

  keyle
  It will be interesting to see the first AAA game that uses these methods instead of rendering a 3D world. Even if made from CGI worlds, it would be a very interesting approach and with somewhat predictable performances.Reminds me of Ecstatica [1], a 1994 game that had intense visuals with a very odd/different rendering engine made of 3D ellipsoids; in a way really crude splats in gouraud shading.[1] https://ecstatica.fandom.com/wiki/Ecstatica
• boppo1
  I really wantt to get into splatting and I have the tools: good camera, v comfy in blender, comfy with graphics programming ideas, 4080. But I haven't found a good 'all in one intro' to it yet. Possibly because I'm foss-biased and have dismissed proprietary options. But does anyone know of a good 'vertical tutorial' on this stuff?
• sorenjan
  When looking at their linked interactive viewer it looks like they need 128 spp for the image quality to equal 3dgs. Maybe you can reduce that with some temporal tricks and noise reduction filtering, but that's still a lot of samples.
• Menu

  HexDecOctBin
  Can someone point to a resource/tutorial for learning point splatting (the 90s rendering technique)? Gaussian Splatting has completely over taken the search results, and the original technique is now near impossible to find.
• Menu

  phrotoma
  I love this site design. It uses the entire width of the monitor rather than a slender column of pixels down the middle with large blocks of unused space on either side, with a font for my old man eyes.<3
• Menu

  Epitaque
  Did not read the paper (sorry) but I wonder how this compares to mesh splatting (https://meshsplatting.github.io/). I feel like mesh splatting can produce higher quality results because triangles are very good at representing sharp features, and gaussians aren't.
• djmips
  Could this be a new direction for Google Streetview perhaps?
• MattCruikshank
  My dumb idea... do outdoor scans, and then convert the contents into 1m^2 blocks... And then, just dumbly stitch them together.Kind of like Minecraft... but with user-generated gaussian-splat blocks.
• DamnInteresting
  Video overview of the technology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8yRlA7jqEQOrdinarily I don't prefer video, but the visuals are helpful here.Also, an online interactive, but it seems to only work in Chrome: https://superspl.at/scene/ff1d0393
• cyber_kinetist
  Really nice idea for 3DGS rendering - though the main problem is the noise (an unfortunate issue for all Monte-Carlo based methods).I think future papers would probably continue improving on this method and focus on how to sample the points more efficiently while being unbiased (similar to how ray-tracing solved their performance issues). Or maybe... we can just add a deep-learning based denoiser and call it a day!
• Menu

  lucamark
  This feels like Monte Carlo rendering applied to rasterization. I'm wondering if it's a brand-new or a well established methodology
• Menu

  praveen9920
  Sorting the gaussians is the compute heavy part in gaussian splatting. So, Im guessing this will give only marginal improvement in terms rendering speed.
• cubefox
  Their point splatting method is orthogonal to level-of-detail rendering (they reference a few papers which try to do this), so both point splatting and LoD could be combined in the future for an even greater performance gain during rendering. They already implement occlusion and frustum culling.Point splatting does introduce a lot of noise though, and their denoiser introduces ghosting, but they say a more sophisticated denoiser would give considerably better quality.
• Menu

  pixelesque
  > millions of threadsReally?! What OSs can handle that many native threads?Also, this seems quite similar to stochastic progressive drawing of pointclouds for realtime that has been done for > 15 years in the VFX industry with GPU shaders in a tiled/bucketed fashion, unless this isn't progressive maybe? (The fact it's been accepted for Siggraph likely indicates it's slightly different).