HN

Comments (147)

• Menu

  smetannik
  Please, stop using "written in Rust" as some kind of advantage or killer feature.
• Menu

  usrbinenv
  No mobile version, but I'm visiting from a tablet, should work at least if switch to "Desktop" in the browser manually. I don't care if I get horizontal scroll - not showing your visitors anything at all is an automatic "I'm out".Second, when I browsed from an actual desktop, and clicked on links for files it was all slow as hell - specifically the part when you click on a file an expect it to just load, you instead get: 1) some layout switch which looks like page reload 2) then it says "loading..." for several seconds.After looking at the source code, it appears to be React or similar frontend framework... Ugh. I don't know why people choose to use that stuff, just have a regular SSR which would work a hundred times faster and is more pleasant. And if you really want an SPA, don't use React, Vue or Svelte (and similar), it's horrible and always slow.Finally, since this appears to be a YC company, it shouldn't matter what's it written in. In fact, I don't even know why Rust would be a good thing here when Go or even Rails/Django would work just fine - but again, it just reinforces the meme that if it's written in Rust, you'll surely hear about it.Overall, the minimalism idea is welcomed, but it supposedly should appeal to people like myself and it doesn't for all the reasons I mentioned above.
• Menu

  graypegg
  Interesting stuff! I really like the design philosophy you're applying here, where the browser/web behaviour is actually part of the UX. Pretty rare for web application nowadays!If I could make one suggestion, I really like the old MacOS "inspector" pattern. Basically a consistent way to get meta-information about any "thing" the user chooses to inspect. Your right sidebar is going towards that, but it would need some work to make it more consistent between views.GitHub's UI has these weird meta-states/restrictions that are so badly explained in the UI they feel like bugs. Each line gets a [...] menu in github which lets you see the blame/spawn a issue linking to it/get a permalink/etc. It's a totally different UI in the diff view, and then totally different again if you're looking at a comment referencing a line in a diff AND different if it's referencing a permalink to a line in a file, even if it's the same code that would be in that diff!I want the UI to have obvious "nouns". If the UI is showing me a line of code, even if it's in a diff view, let me "inspect" it and get the exact same meta-info + tools I get for lines of code anywhere. It's "a line", not a weird meta state of "a line, but you're in the comment of a PR linking to this line".Same concept applies to comments/commits/authors/etc. If the UI shows me a username, I should be able to pull up a "who is that again" inspector. Going into github's commit view, clicking on a name... and being sent to a filtered list of that person's commits makes zero sense to me because this is the ONLY place where that happens. That behaviour should be a "recent commits" button inside some "user inspector".
• alexpadula
  "Better" is a strong word without proven analysis or some kind of statistic, that honestly caught me off-guard as when you state that I expect something like a product like Bitbucket, obviously as you can imagine. Either way, cool project.
• Menu

  garbagepatch
  I like the terminal aesthetics but please, for accessibility's sake, make input boxes look more like input boxes and buttons look like buttons.
• Menu

  skrtskrt
  Love the idea of someone tackling this space in Rust, but please just make a normal UI, I have no idea what I am looking at.
• Sailemi
  Big fan of the design! Different but easy to get a hand of. Having /profile also be linked on the homepage with the other main pages for ease of navigation would be nice, the profile link at the bottom feels like it clashes with the rest of the UI to my eyes.
• Menu

  eqvinox
  What's the differentiation against Forgejo going to be?
• Menu

  TazeTSchnitzel
  The minimal look feels very refreshing, and yet it's not disorienting like many minimal web git UIs are in my experience; I actually feel like I know how to navigate this thing. Site feels very snappy too, especially with those instantly loading file previews when you hover. Congrats!
• Menu

  applfanboysbgon
  [flagged]
• Menu

  screamingninja
  > 5. What features will gitdot not have?> AI.> We view AI as an implementation detail — and do not think that using it is necessarily good.> In fact, we think it makes many products worse by acting as a bandaid for poor design.> That isn’t to say we are blind to it, but that we will be judicious in our use of it instead.Not sure I follow. What feature are the developers referring to? I understand that AI will power tools that may or may not fit a particular use case. How is AI a feature and what does it mean to be anti-AI?
• abathologist
  Would be interested in a comparison with https://sourcehut.org/ (which has a comparable minimal aesthetic, but also has the deep benefit of being FOSS.
• Menu

  Cieric
  Seems interesting an I'll take more of a peek after work, but one thing that stood out to me is the only way back to the home page after navigating to a repo is the back button. Going back to the home page via the back button also doesn't retain that "new" was selected. But I agree with others, I do like the simplicity of the site.
• Menu

  flexagoon
  Feels weird to ship a website without mobile support in this day. The desktop version looks nice though
• Menu

  Kiro
  I think you're in an interesting space where there's a real opportunity to create something fresh. When people are actively looking for alternatives it will be easier to break out of the established norms.What does anti-AI mean? Don't really see anything about it in the design doc except "no AI copilot".
• skeledrew
  I see "anti-AI" in the description and I wonder what that entails. Then I try to look at one of those tending links and all I encounter is "Mobile support to come.", and mobile is my primary device for checking things out. I want to stay positive about the future if this project, but Idk what to think here.
• Menu

  999900000999
  >As of now, all repositories are free, but we do envision charging for private repositories for teams in the future.Please don’t do this.Charge a fair price, in fact find a fair price and double it.I don’t want a free GitHub clone, I want one that works.How about 50$50 private repos, 50GBs of git LFS storage. Add collaborators for free.Actually respond to customers. At this level you only need 1000 paying customers to make it worth while for 2 developers.
• OSaMaBiNLoGiN
  Most people would agree that Github isn't good software anymore.Most people would also agree that building a better Github is not a super easy two-person task.
• Menu

  applfanboysbgon
  This is a violation of Git's trademark, and your usage of it is expressly prohibited by their policy.https://git-scm.com/about/trademark> [...] you may not use any of the Marks as a syllable in a new word or as part of a portmanteau (e.g., "Gitalicious", "Gitpedia") used as a mark for a third-party product or service.> Please be aware that GitHub and GitLab are exceptions to this Policy because they are subject to explicit licensing arrangements that pre-date, and thus take precedence, over this Policy.You might've known that if you hadn't vibe-launched this while for some reason marketing it as anti-AI, but here we are in a world where basic research is a dead art.
• Menu

  jacques_chester
  It is ... problematic ... to lead with "anti-AI" and then bury terms like "judicious in our use of it" in the fine print.IMO a team like yours can either:* Use LLMs, in which case you aren't "anti-AI".* Not use LLMs currently, but the non-use is not due to following a principle, in which case you aren't "anti-AI".* Not use LLMs and promise never to do so.I'm happy you are trying something new. But you hurt yourself by engaging in something very old: disingenuity.(edits for presentation and grammar)
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  ramon156
  A lot of fuss that needs to be chiseled out first. There's an idiom that is followed a bit too black and white, but the grey is grey.No loading animation, but my screen jitters while loading in stuff. My internet speed is fine, so it's a performance/bug issue.I also did not initially understand the UI, but that'll come as I use it more
• Menu

  HyperL0gi
  > What is a bit unique is: 1) we built it in RustThe first unique characteristic is that it was built in Rust? Why does it matter from a user perspective? I was expecting the first point to be something that would convince me to check it out.Unless the goal is to find people to collaborate on building the software. I got a bit confused.Looking good regardless :)
• NetOpWibby
  Did you guys just make my own git forge plans useless? This looks great!I was gonna call mine EOL and I already bought the domain eol.sh...then again, I could just do mine in TypeScript and launch it anyway.
• Menu

  icase
  is anyone else absolutely sick of hearing about rust?
• Aeolun
  Ooh, it's the same thing I'm building.
• edfletcher_t137
  > 7. How does gitdot make money?> We don't.This cannot last forever. What's the plan when it runs out?
• mckee_plus_plus
  Paul & Mikkel work at GitHub and are trying to offload traffic from gh
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  SwiftyBug
  I absolutely love the minimalist UI.I see code reviews is in the roadmap, I can't wait to try it.
• Menu

  umanwizard
  Why does it have to be a website? Why merely "CLI-inspired" and not actually CLIs?
• moojacob
  I love the design. Clean and refreshing - you start at the left and every sub element goes to the right. Like a file browser. And the commit screen is dense but super readable. I would move the summary column from the right of the README to the left of the README on the /home screen (and call /home the /README).Loading files is very slow but I assume that's because HN is hammering the server.I am not a believer in negative advertising. So I don't give a poop you are anti-ai. Or "better" than Github (better for who??). Just imply you are a code forge thats made for serious developers who need something engineered to be fast and reliable.I wish you the best of luck, I can see Linear coming out with git repos after coming out with a diff reader. I have a suspicion there's space for many code forges in the market as you build out more features, especially if you lean into your products hacker-y-ness
• Menu

  Uptrenda
  So like: not to hijack thread -- but is there any way to post about what you've built on HN without making people angry if its vibe coded? What's the etiquette there because I have a thingy I am going to post soon (open source, non commerical) and don't really want to be ripped apart by HN. I am a software engineer but doubt that matters if it's all vibe coded.
• Grimblewald
  FAQ point 5 is pure comedy.
• 7moritz7
  There is a dozen CLAUDE.md in the gitdot source. The "Anti-AI" in your title seems a bit disingenuous.
• gerdesj
  Big Brother seems to be built in to us humans.git itself is decentralised - all repos are equal. Mr T designed it that way because ... well that's all that was needed for Linux kernel development back in the day and it still seems to work. The management stuff can be managed quite well via email and some choice socials. Obviously that nonsense cannot possibly scale to the size of your enterprise thingies!Yet again we have a better Big Brother than Big Brother ... this time with Rust, yum!
• syngrog66
  unfortunate name: very similar to Godot at passing glance. my brain already stumbles going back and forth between seeing LLVM and LLM, IP (Internet protocol) and IP (Intellectual property). Don't me started on X vs X vs X vs ...I do like that it reinforces this rule of thumb: Q: "How do you know if any given piece of software is written in Rust? A: "Oh they'll tell you. They *will* tell you. Upfront and over and over again."
• carterschonwald
  i want to view desktop on my mobile… and it wont lettt meeeee
• Menu

  hntiz
  Just one minor piece of feedback that's unlikely to be a priority. I cannot fully navigate when browsing in a terminal browser (chawan in my case, haven't tried with w3m or lynx). For example the "h" keymap for going home does not work.That said though, one of my pet peeves around browsing Github Web from the terminal was having to click "skip to content" just to get the body. So you definitely delivered there (after having read your design post). Good luck with the rest of the year.
• Simon-curtis
  This project looks awesome. I’ve really enjoyed your blogs about the design process and learnings. Brave to jump into Rust while learning a new domain but very commendable. Wish I had a close programmer friend to do this stuff with, sounds like a great asset to have such great chemistry.You seem to be experienced devs, so I’m sure you already know, but don’t listen to the contrarians on HN. They’ll suck the life out of you because it’s not 100% the way they like it.
• j3s
  "we built it in rust" is not a differentiator - especially when the first thing that happens when i click a repo is "mobile not supported"lol. really stretching the word "better"
• purple-leafy
  I mean, no offence but nothing is more of a signal of marketing fluff to me than saying “built in Rust” or “anti-AI”Tell us why we should care outside of the marketing fluff - these aren’t highlights - if anything they are quite off putting.Your project needs to stand on its own actual merits.Critique over, congratulations on launching something or building something anyway.But what makes this different? And why have you chosen that philosophy - outside of marketing fluff
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  chwzr
  the design looks neat. + for hexagonal pattern on the backend - that fits perfectly!
• selectnull
  > Install gitdot-cli to push and clone private reposHmmm... no. Why should I? Just let me use git.
• sigmonsays
  that UI is way too opinionated
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  Imustaskforhelp
  This is really interesting. Especially as its open source and I really liked the UI design of it.I was thinking about creating my own git forge given the unreliability of Github and I wouldn't be able to create just at the moment incredibly reliable software like git forge although I could use AI to create a minimalist piece of software, I didn't because I didn't want to create yet another AI slop fighting another AI slop (github/gitlab).Forejo is incredible but I have always wanted to get more alternatives in this field.Much thanks for making it. I have signed up and I have high hopes for it too and I will try to either self host this on my servers or gitdot.io as well as GithubI recommend making a small community in matrix (preferred), fluxer.gg, discord etc. as I'd like to join it.PS: small personal thing that I have made which helps in making communities: https://mirror.forumI am definitely interested in gitdot.io! This seems incredibleI wish nothing but the best for you folks. Gonna create a local copy of the source code of gitdot.io right now!Thanks for open-sourcing the efforts too. I really appreciate it :-D The software is so nice!I genuinely hope that you guys and the project blows up and if you guys might ever hire a junior dev, I hope you all could remember me as the world right now needed such software that you have made!! :-D (Although I am more interested in managing servers/golang but that's because rust is hard to learn as a beginner but that's different topic but I like rust's ideas too and rust is a great/preferred language with golang for this type of service :-D)
• Menu

  mathisdev7
  I hate that when we scroll through a codebase files, it changes the file we are hovering, I'd rather having to click to see the file
• Menu

  isatty
  Maybe it’s the HN effect but /files takes a while to load.Personally while I appreciate something not being AI slop, writing something in Rust has no meaning to me.
• daishi55
  > anti-AI> mobile support to comeCmon lol. Give opus 20min and it will give you a mobile site throw in a better-looking desktop site for fun.
• triyambakam
  Sorry but the name is too hard to say. At least it's not as bad as Forgejo
• Menu

  domtron_vox
  I signed up and the code email went to spam. A quick look at the DNS seemed to show you were lacking DKIM and DMARC records.If I'm not mistaken about that, you should remedy that to ensure email providers don't dump your emails to spam.
• Menu

  keyle
  We've built a better SpaceX! says kid with cardboard rocket in the backyard. In Rust we trust!Common man, you're not even 5% of a Github replacement. Don't act like one. You've built a Git web UI with accounts, the easy part.> Building software is still hardYou don't say.
• denysvitali
  > Mobile support to come.In 2026 not being mobile first is a bit of a disappointment to be honest