<- Back
Comments (21)
- mnkvSounds nice except that these are 1 very small scale model, 1 reranker, and 1 embedding model that are far from frontier LLM level. And they're not open sourced.As much as I agree with the message, this reads like marketing copy trying to make a big deal out of a tiny model being hosted privately.
- thunderbong> ... this reality only further cements our position that frontier artificial intelligence ought to be accessible to everyone, rather than concentrated in the hands of a select few frontier labs, ourselves included.> To that end, every single model we’ve released has, from day one, been available for air-gapped self-hosting. We have no plans on changing that. In fact, we’ve doubled down on AI sovereignty, ...Extremely commendable.
- wg0What if there's export control order for AWS services one day? Or cloud services in general?
- furymanDespite the fact that it was available only till 22nd June I largely call it a marketing stunt. But the fact that government took extreme measures to contain the danger that model violation exposes I think this move reflects towards more broader issue of accessibility. As of my knowledge not just US but major leading countries have been keeping knowledge classified. Major example is defence sector which heavily keeps information under legal and penalizing guards. It is tough to identity the misusing entities of this assets they go into heavy licensing and red tapism. Maybe AI would also meet the same fate in coming future is what I sense from this move.
- anonundefined
- owebeeoneI feel like we're an ostrich on a beach.
- ImnimoI'm not sure I understand why this company is talking about "frontier artificial intelligence".
- jeswinSorry to say this, but it reads promotional. Especially with a model which was on Show HN a couple of months back, and is not a comparable product.
- ttttrgrgrg[dead]
- dakolli[flagged]
- feverzsjAt least, there'll be less slops on internet.