HN

Comments (144)

• Menu

  lokar
  I’m surprised by the comments here.The Broadcom business model (outside the chip business) had been pretty well known, and they don’t really hide it.They are tech bottom feeders. They find large businesses with a decent moat and free cash flow but are in long term decline (and wasting cash trying to find something new). They buy them, cut development, support and marginal products. Raise prices and squeeze as much as they can.
• Menu

  fsuts
  ”Tesco, a retail conglomerate headquartered in the United Kingdom”For any non Uk people, it’s the largest supermarket in Uk. Combination of large stores and smaller high street convenience stores.(2nd largest was owned by Walmart who sold it recently to private equity and so now it’s saddled with debt and being ruined…).
• Menu

  sokoloff
  If Tesco needs character witnesses that Broadcom has done this to many other customers, I think they’ll find plenty of willing participants.Broadcom’s marketing for Proxmox is extremely effective.
• Menu

  sqircles
  I worked in software acquisitions for a large organization and it was really eye opening to see how insane some of these companies are when it comes to pricing customers out. I always wondered - what is the motive? They make pricing structure changes that aren't even considerable for any organization that has any fashion of a budget. VMWare was one example where our already insane costs that had nearly tripled over the previous 4 years were quoted to triple at the end of the period.Another was a Java SE licensing change that went from around $1k per instance, of which we had about 5. Mind you there is little to no maintenance support provided here. The increase was to $5.25 per organizational employee per instance, whether they used the instance or not - of which we had 100k. The choice was obviously a simple one.I can only assume very few organization stay on the ride for those kinds of changes, but obviously they must - but why?
• Menu

  nubinetwork
  > Tesco is also dealing with migration challenges related to data security because its new, unnamed virtualization software is incompatible with the Veeam and Zerto products it uses.What is a VMware alternative, that isn't compatible with backup software? I'm guessing it's not nutanix?
• Alien1Being
  Broadcom shares are performing spectacularly well.With the new $35 billion dollar AI / XPU deal, Broadcom is looking to ditch the legacy customers and move to the new shiny AI billions.
• Menu

  Alien1Being
  Spoke to a senior guy at a large national bank recently who swore that they will never again get any Broadcom hardware.He talked about "Broadcom lies.."
• Menu

  proxysna
  Great time to migrate off VMware. All the migration paths are well-trodden by now, but goddamn 40k vm's. A lot of work ahead.
• Menu

  whatever1
  Why a retailer needs 40k servers? What are they serving? To whom?What is wrong with system designers these days? Are they designing or just selling?
• bdavisx
  They also at some point purchased Pivotal Cloud Foundry and increased the licensing costs by incredible (order of magnitude) amounts.They are completely destroying their customer base for these products.
• Menu

  firesteelrain
  I don’t know how anyone can afford these migrations especially for production on prem workloads without building literally duplicate sets of hardware clusters then manually migrate workloads.
• nmstoker
  I wonder if it's fair to say Tesco are experiencing being treated somewhat like they treat farmers!
• Menu

  senshan
  Interesting -- none of the major VMWare customers had a second/alternative vendor/product? I hope they learnt the lesson.
• Menu

  driverdan
  As someone who has never dealt with anything close to this scale, why would it take 18 months to migrate? Is this poor config management, a lack of automation, or something else?
• Menu

  elevation
  My hope from this headline was that some open source solution was functionally equivalent from a business perspective. But then I read that Tesco has had to:> procure alternative solutions with reduced functionalitymeaning VMWare is still basically the only option if you need something that works out of the box. Hopefully this changes in the mid term as other customers migrate away.
• mbac32768
  It's incredible how hard it is for firms to migrate away from platforms. Clearly you could just give something away for nearly free for 20 years and then jack the price up and make bajillions.Even better if you can charge a mildly high license fee for 20 years first and then jack it up to something outrageous and still have customers who just can't drop you.
• kbar13
  i just had to spend a bunch of time (not for work, for hobby purposes) bc broadcom acquired bitnami or something and then decided to kill off the free docker images for various software. very very annoying. can't believe they did this by just yanking the images from the registry too, leaving nodes to fail if they lose their image cache and have to restart
• Menu

  GlacierFox
  Why would you self sabotage such a considerable contract? Are Broadcom stupid?
• puskavi
  Imagine paying for virtualization software when open source options are almost industry standard
• anon
  undefined
• eqvinox
  [dead]
• Nikhil37475
  effective
• Nikhil37475
  extremely effective
• Menu

  dzonga
  this is probably another big risk with enterprises going all in on using spring-boot.migrating to quarkus won't save you either - since it's IBM on the other hand.if only other ecosystems could catch up to Java/JVM solutions.
• usernametaken29
  At that scale it is almost always easier to run your own infrastructure. Like, I’m not kidding, kubernetes will handle it fairly easy. Get a DevOps engineer or a good consulting agency and run your cluster on Hetzner. This saved us insane amounts of money. No need to buy infrastructure outright but simply moving off the cloud will easily squash your bill by 50% if not more.
• Menu

  xvxvx
  Before AI, the cloud was the big thing. It took years for companies to understand the risk of hosting on someone else’s infrastructure, regardless of the initial cost savings. I’m somewhat happy to see reality sink in, though this specific case is quite alarming.If AI survives, we’ll see inflated costs drive companies back to hiring actual human beings to do the work.
• chatmasta
  If anyone here is looking to move Greenplum workloads off Broadcom (or unsupported open source), email me miles.richardson@enterprisedb.com — I’m the PM for WarehousePG [0], an open source fork of Greenplum. We’ve got a cracked engineering team working hard to modernize it.At EDB we’ve forked Greenplum from last OSS into WarehousePG, added over a dozen customers with petabytes of data, and hired a few dozen specialists. We have an extension for Lakehouse connectivity based on DataFusion (with optional offload to Spark including GPU acceleration) to read/write Iceberg. And we have a lot planned for the next version, which you might infer from the name: WarehousePG 19.[0] https://github.com/warehouse-pg/warehouse-pg