<- Back
Comments (128)
- o_mI've subscribed to Kagi for three of years now. Kagi is still great, but it doesn't feel like "Google ten years ago" anymore. I don't think it is because Kagi got worse, rather it is the web that has become worse. The content nowadays kinda sucks.
- poetrilI feel like half of what I do on HN is talk about Kagi. I switch to Kagi in 2023, and haven't looked back. Between vim keybinds for navigating search, explicit AI opt-in, the ability to curate search (block sites, increase others), and more. It really lets me feel like I can control my search tool, and at least so far its felt like our interests are aligned, I give them money and they make sure search is as good as possible for me.
- SadTromboneKagi is great, and I'd pay some amount of money for it, but $10/mth is simply too much for me personally to pay for a search engine. I understand why others do and enjoyed my Kagi experience, however. If only the $5 plan had more than 300 searches.
- coldpieI've asked a number of times on HN threads for specific examples of searches that Kagi performs better on than DDG or Google, and never gotten a solid reply. It seems what people like about Kagi is the customization and surrounding tooling, but the actual search quality is about the same or possibly worse. That's cool, but I don't find it worth the cash personally.
- maelitoI'm surprised there is so little attention given to Staan.ai, the european search indexed built by Ecosia and Qwant.The API is now available, you can make a query after creating your token.This could enable SE innovation based on other sources than Google, Bing and Brave.I wonder if Kagi's using it.Edit : thanks, corrected the URL
- joshstrangeI've been paying for Kagi for almost 3 years now but with the advent of LLMs (really in the past 3-6 month) my usage has fallen off a cliff. I really wish they included some level of API/MCP access so I'd like to continue to support what they are trying to do but every month when I get charged I think "Is this still worth paying for?".I could just pay for their API directly instead of my subscription but I wish they'd meet (some of) their customers where they are.
- everfrustratedI feel sorry for Kagi. I've paid for the last couple of years as I support a better web search.But I've found my web searching is so small now with AI.I checked and I did less than 300 Kagi searches last month so downgraded my plan.I wish them the best but timing is a b**.
- athenotHappy Kagi subscriber here! I just wished Apple let them integrate into Safari without the need for silly hacks.
- hyperionultraDoes search engines still relevant enough in LLM age? My grandma and grandpa already using cgpt voice for anything related web search. And if this demography shifting, imagine youth…
- cavoiromOn Kagi, you can create custom assistant with customized prompt, LLM agent and lens. It's powerful to retrieve knowledge on a specific domain.
- imzadiI've switched to Kagi full time. I even use Orion on ios and wish there was an Android version. Kagi translate is superior to Google translate, also. I love that it gives me a more direct translation and then suggests alternatives and tells me what situations they would work best in.
- Cider9986Brave is as good results as Kagi for me and more anonymity-focused, because your searches aren't tied to an account, but I like that Kagi has a simple business model. I would pay for either if I could pay 3 dollars or less per month with Monero.
- shibaprasadbI was recently looking at the search engine referrers for my personal website. Was a bit surprised to see Kagi at the top of the list. Don't know how!
- VarelionI really wish I was in a position I could afford to subscribe to Kagi.
- johen8What made me leave Kagi was the abysmal offer of widgets, plus the repeated assertion that they were working on them and at least until recently, no progress has been made. Brave search has maybe worse results and I miss the bangs to change result location, but at least during the world cup, for example, I used its widgets frequently, plus the financial, weather widgets... I wish they would actually go through with their promises with those
- amazingamazingI have found that AI search gets me what I want faster than any traditional search engine.
- starvar2Does Kagi work well in other countries for finding products?
- nemomarxHow'd you solve the Arabic issue?(the previous blog post mentioned Arabic language news sources as a major pain point, so I'm wondering if anything changed.)
- 1970-01-01I don't find value in it. The hard search results are usually better than Google, but not always better than Google. And when I'm paying for it, it needs to be better every single time or I'm not a happy customer. They need to do better and index more relevant results and vaporize the crap or give me a $.99/month subscription.
- browningstreetKagi is cool but it’s also easy enough to add “-AI -site:YouTube.com” to Google results
- HelloUsernamehtml.duckduckgo.com or lite.duckduckgo.com shows you pure search results without any ads or javascript
- levkkKagi is amazing. Worth the subscription, 10 times over. I don't have to worry about sponsored search results, or slop from the "AI overview". High quality results, like Google used to be.For a price of two cups of coffee.
- theususKagi for me is same as Google. But Brave is a bit different plus it uses its own indexes
- mancerayderI hate Google, but whenever I tried (for months at a time) to use Duckduckgo or Brave search I had a terrible experience. In one case buying shoes brought me to a scam copycat website that Google never would have done. More importantly the searches just feel fuzzier than Google. Which is the opposite of what I want! How come no one trusts me to use literal strings.Or is the indexing just worse and Google wins?That's why I'm wary of Kagi. Love privacy and customization. But functionality kind of matters, too. I don't want to buy a smart phone that sucks at making basic phone calls.
- selfawareMammalHow about Kagi using YANDEX?
- drcongoKagi user for 5 years and still absolutely love it.
- inclinq[flagged]