HN

Comments (347)

• Menu

  joshstrange
  Due to pricing insanity (not that Apple prices weren’t insane before the ram/ssd shortages) I’m not in the market but I do wonder if my next computer should be a Mac Studio instead of a MBP that lives its life docked. Might be better to just run a Studio and Neo for the very few times I actually need remote capabilities.
• Menu

  osmukka
  Reading this press release was almost physically painful, because of how much Apple loves to use the phrase "up to". In total it appears 46 times.
• Menu

  blints
  10 grand for 256GB memory. Likely double that for 512GB, but won't be available or finalized until October. Thunderbolt 5 is highest bandwidth external IO available at 120Gb/s. 1.2TB/s claimed max internal memory bandwidth.Not exactly "future proof" for >1T parameter models but good for targeting specific lower-parameter models, or if you can rely on pipeline parallelism and run a cluster.
• Menu

  doctoboggan
  > Apple’s most powerful Mac raises the bar for local AIWow, "Local AI" mentioned in the subheading above the fold - it's really awesome to see Apple leaning into this use case and I think it will definitely pay off for them going forward. Fingers crossed Apple is able to put some engineering effort towards shipping with one of the frontier open weight models included and optimized exactly for the machine.
• Menu

  OneWhereWhy
  The thing that intrigues me the most is this:"Storage performance is up to twice as fast, with a next-generation SSD architecture built on PCIe Gen 6..."This is the first personal computer I've noticed that has PCIe Gen 6 storage. I've only seen enterprise PCIe Gen 6 SSDs up until now. Gen 5 SSDs in consumer devices already have high temperatures and thermal throttling, so I'm worried about how Apple's implementation will perform (I know they don't use off-the-shelf SSDs anymore, but I'd imagine the temps would still be a problem).
• Menu

  GodelNumbering
  1.2 TB/s bandwidth of M5 Ultra comes from two dies of M5 Max (each 614 GB/s) connected together using 4.4 TB/s inter-die fabric.For a non-quantized Deepseek V4 flash on an ultra, I would estimate about 1000+ tokens per second prefill and 50+ tokens per second on generation. This is actually quite usable and near parity to cloud.They mention "adds the GPU Neural Accelerators." which, if exploitable for LLM loads, would probably help the prefill a lot
• Menu

  vadansky
  Sorry for being lazy, but is there a rough breakdown like "You get sonnet level for M5 and Opus for M5 pro, etc.", or is it still speculative. Or put simpler, do you get Opus level for the 256GB M5 Max?
• Menu

  meerita
  Mac Studio with M5 Max starts at $2,499 (U.S.) and $2,299 (U.S.) for education. Additional configure-to-order options are available at apple.com/mac-studio. Mac Studio with M5 Ultra starts at $5,499 (U.S.) and $5,099 (U.S.).I am in Europe, and the Mac Studio M5 Ultra GPU 64 cores with 96GB RAM is up to 6.649,00 €. Ouch.
• Menu

  alberth
  It looks like speculation that Apple would raise the base chip’s maximum RAM from 32GB to 48GB was wrong.Apple also launched the base M6 today with a 32GB RAM limit, suggesting 512GB may remain the maximum for Ultra chips for some time. Since these Ultra chips combine 16 base chips:32GB × 16 = 512GB
• larodi
  Incredible that LMStudio, an open and ever evolving (unstable) project, is cited as a speed reference.
• Menu

  drnick1
  Why doesn't Apple make a tower PC with a standard ATX motherboard, power supply, extension cards, etc, like in the old days? That's immensely more upgradable, easier to cool, and I don't believe most people expect their desktops PCs to be tiny.
• stephen_cagle
  Anthropic can't have their IPO soon enough (rumored October) if these Macs match their reported specs.Maybe $17k for a 512gig system that can do 1.2TB/s seems like a pretty good deal for a small office.
• Menu

  gizajob
  Bizarre there isn’t a 1TB RAM option hidden away for the excessively frivolous or VC funded.
• Menu

  chvid
  Mac Studio with M5 Ultra starts at $5,499 - computing this expensive belongs in a server room serving multiple people not on a single person’s desk. (But still cool).
• Menu

  swader999
  Here's me trying to justify this when I can run frontier models in the cloud for less than the monthly finance charge for this beast.
• Menu

  alberth
  M6 (base) in Mac Mini too:https://www.apple.com/mac-mini/
• prometheus1992
  The new mac minis and mac studios are going to be in shortage for at least first 6 months from 9.22
• Menu

  egonschiele
  > M6 supports up to 32GB of unified memory to multitask across demanding apps and run LLMs on device for secure and private agentic tasks. It also provides up to 170GB/s of unified memory bandwidth — a 10 percent increase over M5 and a 2.5x increase over M1.Isn't 170GB/s slow for bandwidth?
• Menu

  nythroaway048
  512GB unified memory option coming available in October.
• sowrabh
  How does this compare to NVIDIA DGX Spark? From what I see, if the performance is better than 2x DGX Spark, this could boost and in a way reshape Local AI in a significant way (along with all the OSS models wave that's happening) - look forward to that!
• mythz
  Waited years for a decent Desktop lineup like this as I was hugely disappointed in the generation old M3 Ultra when it was released. Unfortunately it took Apple so long that the memory prices are now through the roof - USD $4000 for 164GB RAM upgrade is insane.I may consider a M6 Mac Mini as a stop-gap whilst waiting out RAM Apocalypse to be over. Basically abandoning any ambitions of AI sovereignty and riding out subsidised LLM pricing for the next couple of years.
• speckx
  I was looking forward and hoping that the Mini and Studio would have 8K at 120Hz. Oh well, maybe the M7s will have that.
• anon
  undefined
• nico_h
  Just insane RAM price. Can’t wait for the bubble to pop. AI is useful but not at the currently unsustainable price (too expensive for the provided value to corporate customers at too cheap per token vs the actual cost of creating it)
• Menu

  ricardobayes
  512GB unified RAM is going to be really good for running local LLMs.
• Menu

  dnw
  It’d be great when they start releasing these machines with the local models ready for use!
• Menu

  tristor
  I wish they were offering 1TB of Unified Memory for the M5 Ultra. I already have an M5 Max MBP w/ 128GB of RAM for running local models, and while there's a /few/ models that I can run in 512GB that I can't run in 128GB that are interesting, where things really shift is at 1TB of memory which allows you run >1T parameter models w/ 4 bit quants reliably. 512GB is just on the edge of "enough", which is maybe the point of maximum frustration considering current memory prices.Personally, I can't justify dropping the dosh for a 512GB M5 Ultra, but I would be able to justify it to myself if I could get 1TB of memory, because it'd guarantee the flexibility with local models I currently am missing. Seems a huge miss to not offer this... for a price.
• Menu

  intrasight
  It seems super reasonably priced to me. It's only twice as expensive as my first Mac which only had 128K of memory.
• gigatexal
  buy a nice BMW 3 series or buy a 512GB m5 ultra... ;-)I'm glad they brought the 512GB option back.Really want to get my hands on a m6 32GB 2TB model but don't really have a need for one.
• FinnLobsien
  Not a surprise this is launching now. John Ternus is taking the reigns as CEO in a week and was previously SVP of hardware engineering.I can't hate a direction where Apple becomes more about building great computers rather than trying to force more and more subscriptions. I do wish they would fix many of the long-standing OS and native app problems.
• starone99
  It's game changer but it's too bad without enough memory
• lucabytheway
  it cost a fortune with current memory cost. but i was waiting for this! whats the bandwith compared to a rtx pro 5000?
• jdeaton
  unfortunately it does not run linux
• Menu

  neko_ranger
  No looking to cheat, which is better: the MAX or ULTRA?
• Menu

  nalekberov
  Boy, oh boy Apple is the new shovel seller during AI gold rush.Most people at Apple have already realized that their processors are already too powerful for regular users - heck, as a developer my M2 Pro with 32 GB RAM is more than enough for me.Regular users don’t care about local AI either. So, they will probably extract as much money as possible during AI gold rush, but then we will most likely see Applea. Making their software worse (god forbid, forced updates)b. Making their hardware impossible to repair (as they almost accomplished this already) and easier to break.
• zer0zzz
  Seems they’re actually advertising pcie expansion. Dang I’d love to switch to a Mac for my cuda kernel writing.
• kylehotchkiss
  Insta-leased. I’ve ran over 1 million prompts on ollama to determine “is X website”. I’m ready to use use bigger models locally to do more thinking now. I have zero desire to give Dario anymore than $20 a month after his “you all are gonna be mass unemployed” spiel.
• lvl155
  Nice for them to add Thread and 10G ethernet to base Mac Studio. If they allowed first class Linux, this could be a great home server machine. I ordered the base model. 512GB SSD scares me but would I even notice plugging in TB5 external drive?
• Menu

  Devasta
  If I were to get one of these, realistically what is the most advanced AI model I could run locally?
• Menu

  bodash
  "512GB memory option for M5 Ultra coming late October"
• mannanj
  Am I the only one that now finds press releases like this similar to "AI Slop"I know there's tons of marketing language, buzz words and attempts at convincing me of some agenda that isn't super clear without lots of effort in "validating" the slop. I guess its not bad "slop" though if a human put in effort in editing it (imo >50% human curating = not really bad ai slop)Though I still would prefer I could just get the prompt. What human thoughts, direction and "prompt" went into writing this article? in the same way as we ask for the prompt for AI generated outputs, I would prefer it for human generated output too. For writing at the least. I could have saved time, got the purity of the argument, and got more clear information. I wonder if we can get a future where humans just express their intent with each other and stop trying to hide our agenda; I want a world we can trust each other greater and interpret and act on our goals without the noise of trying to impress or market to each other & the additional words that go into that.
• wetpaws
  [dead]
• CurbStomper
  [dead]
• TheExaltd4
  [flagged]
• TheExaltd4
  [flagged]
• Menu

  polyterative
  Very much happy with my machine.Got a base m4 max studio in December. 2350eur what a deal
• jbverschoor
  Very well timed for John Ternus's first quarter.
• Menu

  speedping
  The article's headline contains an em dash. I wonder if it's AI-generated
• ACV001
  $5500 for 96GB of RAM? insanely expensive (the MacOs is really bad compared to Windows or Linux).