HN

Need help?
<- Back
A new ceiling for Λ: the de Bruijn–Newman constant

A new ceiling for Λ: the de Bruijn–Newman constant

judegomila

Comments (15)

  • tel
    I'm not able to judge this for content, but it feels frustrating to read something so obviously Claude-authored as being written "by" Jude Gomila. It's interesting to see the (presumed correct) reduction in this bound and this presentation is pretty compelling. I learned a bit about the Polymath 15 project from this post and I enjoyed that a lot.That said, I have no idea what contribution may have been done by Mr. Gomila or not. I don't know if I can ask him for more details. Even if he wrote the whole thing (and either has deeply internalized Claude's voice or had it edited and rewritten by an agent) it's difficult to believe that he's the sort of expert I'd expect of someone who had actually done all this work.This is basically the same feeling I have about vibe code contributors.
  • steinwinde
    Anyone interested in the subject area has noticed the recent surge of AI-assisted or generated mathematics. From the outside, it is very hard to see, if AI indeed already speeds up progress in mathematics in general - apart from a number of spectacular results, (https://mathoverflow.net/questions/502120/examples-for-the-u...) - or if the quality of the large majority of these "proofs" is so poor that reviewing them is a waste of time.I would be grateful, if someone familiar with the situation could say a word about this.As for the proof in question - I'm not sure the author himself can firmly state he understands every detail of what he presented. In a way it's amusing that people who already enjoy a certain level of recognition outside the field are now using it to find (via shiny websites) reviewers for proofs they have worked out as a hobby using Chat GPT and the like.What we definitely need is more recognition for those who possess the competence and energy to assess the correctness and relevance of such "results".
  • StilesCrisis
    Apparently the unfiltered Claude voice for mathematics is pretty similar to programming.
  • tekacs
    It's really fun seeing Manim [1] used to illustrate a proof!(See the video at the bottom)[1]: https://github.com/3b1b/manim
  • 1970-01-01
  • arbirk
    Λ ≤ 0 in the intro. Great site!
  • unglaublich
    Wow, I have a hard time swallowing these Claude generated blogs. So many off-putting llmisms. I wonder if this is something I just need to accept and get used to, or whether it'll pass as models advance.