<- Back
Comments (10)
- ricardobeatThe first few graphs are impressive, it does a much tidier job. The Go queue one is objectively worse - the other versions keep services and users grouped together, as well as a left-to-right flow. The TALA version makes it look more complicated than it is.
- aidenn0That's nice; my first impressions of D2 were much worse than they should have been since the default layout engine is pretty terrible for some types of graphs; ELK is a big improvement, and when I tried TALA it was sometimes a big improvement over ELK.I never purchased TALA though because I don't use D2 at work, and the costs of buying TALA were above my "fun money" amount.
- sotilracI'm so happy about this, we desperately need better auto layout. I'll be adding it to Daedalus
- ashibanThanks for that. What do you think are the key heuristics / concepts that made it standout or be more appropriate for architecture diagrams?
- boguscoderWould integrating/implementing this into graphviz be a good move or mixing wrong things?
- TaikonerdAlways happy to see D2 on here! In my last job, I had to do several architecture diagrams. Learning D2 took maybe 1 day, and saved me much more time than that.
- azriel91before discovering d2, I wrote / vibe coded my own diagram generator: https://azriel.im/dispositionthen after discovering it, I was too invested in my own project to switch -- the complexity in positioning nodes, routing edges to not draw over labels, taking into account nesting and rank dir gave me an appreciation for how hard these can be, and I kinda wanted my own version (plus other features)
- bbkaneI just started diagramming with d2- I'll have to try this one out!
- ChrisArchitectRelated:D2 Is Non-Profithttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589768
- hefu_hk[flagged]
- LaunchGate[dead]