HN

Comments (67)

• Menu

  declan_roberts
  This kind of thing just reeks as a meta marketing ploy. My eyes were opened when I started attending some marketing all-hands at my last FANG employer. They do this kind of thing all of the time.
• Menu

  atrus
  They'll be fine. As the police often say, if you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide.
• dentemple
  Clearly, all Big Tech needs to do is to create some version of "Flock-powered" smart glasses and, all of a sudden, U.S. police will become Meta's biggest cheerleaders here.
• Menu

  jordanb
  I feel like this is a submarine ad for the glasses by Meta.
• Menu

  2PqboPPmKegvanx
  don't they know?>“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”
• pjc50
  The panopticon is only supposed to look out, not in.
• binarysolo
  Sousveillance is one of the few acceptable use cases for these meta glasses that I can support.
• TheChaplain
  I am a little more concerned over creeps, stalkers, pedos and teenage bullies.
• jlarocco
  The rest of us fear that and nobody gives a sh*...
• Menu

  samrus
  I do love the irony and schedenfruede, but this isnt about recording in public areas, its about recording the inside of prisons and ICE concentration camps. That is generally not something you can legally record and is analogous to a flock camera inside your office or house, which most people would agree is bad
• itsmartapuntocm
  Why did they do something wrong?
• josefritzishere
  This is definitely marketing.
• Menu

  michaelhillaert
  Probably police officers will start to use them as well at some point in the future...
• exe34
  I know that mass surveillance is inevitable, which is why I would prefer the circle to 1984. If they're watching us, we might as well watch them.
• jonathanstrange
  Who doesn't fear that...
• pmdulaney
  Could be?
• YarickR2
  Fear not; they _will_ be used to secretly record them.
• morkalork
  How long until a random person wearing Raybans in one of those states that banned recording within X-feet of an officer gets shot?
• moh_maya
  “Cops apprehensive about impending Orwellian state”
• Menu

  ck2
  wait 'til they learn watches now can record them and upload in realtime via LTEsmartwatches are also just one or two generations away from having cameras
• Menu

  greenavocado
  The police do not care. They already have iPhones stuck in their face the millisecond they pull someone over.
• Menu

  ratelimitsteve
  aren't these the same people telling us that AI-powered cameras on every street corner will make everything better for everyone? What do they have to fear from people seeing what they do? Why do the police fight so hard to ensure everyone else is constantly being observed but also to ensure that they are never being observed? Ostensibly, police act in our name and to our benefit. Why are we kept in the dark as to what they do?
• jimt1234
  Every time I've interacted with the police while wearing sunglasses (when I was younger and lived near the beach) they've instructed me to remove them. I was told they need to see my pupils to get an idea if I'm under the influence. Not saying I agree with any of this, just saying the cops already have a way to negate the creepy sunglasses.
• senshan
  [dead]
• wetpaws
  [dead]
• naikrovek
  [dead]
• Menu

  dmitrygr
  Why? As they say: no expectation of privacy in the public space, amirite?
• aaroninsf
  The pretense that meta will not simply- prevent or more likely perform but withhold and deny existence of recordings of policing- give police total access to "private" recordingsis ludicrous.Meta is literally a surveillance company which as a side hustle addicts people to feeds which destroy their mental health and social relationships and sense of self worth, in service of keepting them docile, consuming, and politically steered.