Need help?
<- Back

Comments (54)

  • hermitShell
    I fail to see how they will take a significant market share or even break even on this venture.It's an overcrowded market. Far better would be to focus on semiconductor supply chain, which Japan already supplies some elements, to sell to fabs.Because the bottleneck is the fabs. If a new 2 nm fab came online today, it would immediately sell all its capacity to 2030 no problem, without Fujitsu trying this gambit.It's not 'sovereign', the architecture is not designed in Japan, the silicon is not fabbed in Japan. This whole thing is sideways.
  • alightsoul
    Fun fact, Fujitsu used to run their own fabs in Japan until they were sold to UMC and now they're another UMC fab although they are stuck at like the 20nm node. So this is likely made at JASM.
  • rwmj
    It's Arm based, although they barely mention that.
  • Youden
    Where are the CPUs fabbed? They make a big deal about "sovereign" but is the CPU actually made in Japan, or do they rely on TSMC?Also odd how big an emphasis they put on AI inference when they don't build the GPU?
  • vondur
    Every developed country is going to push for their own homemade chips. Japan used to make Sparc CPU's back in the day. Probably many others I'm not aware of.
  • 10729287
    The two made-in-Japan, premium grade, Fujitsu laptops I had to work with were by far the worse pieces of electronic I have ever used. Both exhibited identical defects: fans running continuously at maximum speed, and the batteries would completely die within hours of the devices being powered off. Windows or Linux. And don't talk about that tiny unresponsive trackpad to me. Never again.
  • drob518
    One problem we’re going to have with AI hardware is coming up with a standard set of specifications that are comparable. I don’t really care about the CPU GHz and the memory bandwidth, at least not directly. What I really want to know is how many tokens per second this will deliver, but that also depends on the model. We need a standard metric for that. Perhaps we agree on a specific open weight model (e.g. GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen vWhatever) and then measure TPS on the hardware of interest.
  • zackmorris
    I've been calling for high-multicore CPUs (at least 100 cores) with local memories for a quarter century now. No winners so far.A Pentium 4 hit 3.8 GHz longer than that ago in 2004, so that's not special. And the estimated price will be $7,000-10,000, which isn't special either since that's about 10x more than it should be.Hot take: GPUs disrupted the CPU industry to such a degree that CPUs never recovered, and like the k-shaped economy, the current status quo only serves a small fraction of customers. We can and should do better, but sadly we won't. Still, it's good that Fujitsu did this, for the competition if nothing else.
  • redlewel
    Would be cool to get ahold of one of these in the US.I do find it odd that the 2U model has less storage capacity than the 1U on their chart. That doesn't make much sense to me.
  • lucaslazarus
    Wow a corporate TLD in a wild, never seen this outside of the erstwhile domains.google
  • sherujgr
    Iam very curious as to how well it'll perform outside of Asia.
  • kittikitti
    I think what's most notable about this for me is the reduced environmental impact. The specifications list liquid-cooling as optional and it highlights the CPU as the main processor instead of a power hungry GPU. My takeaway is that the next generation of AI HPC's will focus more heavily on sustainable operations.
  • pipes
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandalTheir software is so poor that it caused probably the biggest miscarriage of justice in history. Well that and Fujitsu staff colluding with post office executives to put innocent people in prison rather than admit there was a problem
  • varispeed
    Never buy products of this dodgy company.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandal