<- Back
Comments (50)
- _ache_If the performances are comparable, and there is no evidence it's not.in/out ($) Gemini : 1.5 / 9.0 | Qwen 3.8: 0.15 / 0.47That is a massive cost reduction.Refs: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pric... https://runware.ai/gemini-omni
- syntaxing> audio-visual performance close to Gemini 3.8 Flash and overall audio performance that exceeds Gemini 3.8 FlashWow crazy if true. I think Gemini's audio capability and multi language was the "selling point" for a lot of people. Other capability also matches or exceeds 3.8 Flash.They also made a new harness but github link seems to 404.
- conception3.8 Max is the most “grounded” model I think - talks generally normal, doesn’t go crazy and start doing things (I see you Gemini), has good design choices and isn’t overly nitpicky. But god it’s slow. And only available from Alibaba. Their token plan is stingy too. If I had to pick the “old reliable boring” LLM, a modern Claude 4.5 if you will, Qwen is my choice. Hopefully they don’t RL it to oblivion.
- podocarpPlease what is flash pro ultra and all these, can they just use semver or something
- tolugeniusCurious if or when we'll see the Qwen4 series, one thing I love with Qwen is it comes a much larger range of sizes so I can experiment which extremely small llms.
- lxeLooks like the harness repo is already removed?
- andy_pppWhy can the Chinese build models and Europe cannot? The algorithms behind this stuff are not that complicated, are they? Is it the cost of energy? The illegality and difficulty of obtaining all the data in the world? Lack of capital to start moonshot labs? Lack of optimism?The Chinese just seem to have an ability to get it done without anywhere near the GPUs of the US and Europe can buy these GPUs.I think relying on the US and China for AI is probably not ideal? For example I think Qwen have not released the Omni models as open weights in the past, it’d be good to know if they’re doing this here?