<- Back
Comments (145)
- jimbo456We need to move beyond just banning these glasses - all smart glasses of all kinds - to breaking up these companies. Undo the acquisitions of Insta and Whatsapp - I don't care that will be expensive, thats a shareholders problem.
- yreadIf anyone wants to see the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHKhYL3is5oHe did harass them a bit. I'm looking forward to Meta taking down all videos where someone is a bit harassed. Internet will be a much nicer place!
- ElProlactinThis hypocrisy is not at all surprising. The modus operandi for these people has been rules for thee, but not for me for quite a while now.
- bsoqkI recorded a video harassing the employees of a company, I uploaded it to the servers of said company, and they removed it. Who could have imagined this would happen?
- margorczynskiZuckerberg has a knack for creating the most anti-human products possible. It is a mystery he didn't create or buy out OF.
- asdffGreat idea for protests outside meta offices. Just stand on the public right of way outside the entrance, smiling in your meta ray bans.
- tsakHopefully the Streisand effect will be in full force on this one.
- monneyboiIn China the government controls the discourse. Here it's the corporations.
- diego_moitaAll over the US people are freaking out about Flock cameras and that's justified.Meanwhile, these Meta glasses are far more ubiquitous, far more intrusive, being sold all over the world (not only the US) and their images have a lot less oversight than Flock's. And I don't need to tell anyone how irresponsible Meta is with other people's privacy.And, yet, very few make a scandal about it.
- alperWho remembers the picture of inside Zuckerberg's home that got leaked with the grotesks living their private lives?
- karakoramPrivacy for me but not for thee.
- the_gipsyInstagram is full of videos of guys harassing and antagonizing people in public as "pranks". And this is not some coincidence, since both products are from the same company, they basically unleashed this for engagement.
- incogvitoBut the video was not just the view from his glasses?
- dbg31415That's hilarious. Keep it up!
- blondie9xWhy are these Mets glasses still allowed to be sold? It needs to be stopped and the product recalled.Google glasses came and went. Mets glasses should follow a similar fate.
- alex1138Outside basic network effects like real names Facebook has contributed essentially nothing of value to the world. (And no, don't tell me "React, Pytorch". People were screaming about React's license) The network effects barely matter too because their AI bans you whenever and feeds are so useless you never see what anyone postsInstagram went from a site for photographers to Reels everywhere (and login walls on every page)Zuckerberg is awful. Awful, awful, awful.
- shevy-javaCorporate censorship. Do we want such a future in general, where big companies decide onto you what you can see and what you can not see? These walled digital gardens they built up are already such a huge issue.Now I don't depend on CIAbook, formerly known as Facebook, in any way, shape or form. And I don't use Suckerberg's Spyglasses either - hopefully others feel in a similar way, but unfortunately money convinces people, and I noticed a few "auditors" using spyglasses allegedly for "protection" (though, why they don't use normal vide cameras instead, beats me - perhaps they are not truthful). I fear that the spyglasses will be a success since Suckerberg is so sold on spying on mankind. If Google were not to exist, Facebook would be the number #1 evil company right now.
- wossabCorporation under no obligation to uphold journalistic standards. In other news, water still wet.
- VeejayRampaymeta's pervert glasses
- zmmmmmThe title is misleading - it sounds like they specifically went there to harass employees by filming them, and Meta took down the videos for harassment, like they routinely do if this is reported on their platforms. I'm really not sure what the issue is.