HN

Comments (41)

• Menu

  flowerlad
  It seems every DeepSeek paper/patent has a huge number of authors, and this one is no exception. They couldn't even fit everyone on the page, there are 31 others not shown. This could be an asset protection strategy (i.e., human assets). Imagine if there were only 3 authors. Those authors may get hired away by competitors. If you list every employee on every paper then competitors don't know who to lure away.
• Menu

  yipinwong
  The topic isn't as interesting as how 131 authors communicated to get this out.
• Menu

  vblanco
  380.000 concurrent sandboxes on 160 Epyc based server nodes. Crazy stuff
• jerrygenser
  I wonder if they are signalling that if they can do this for training, then they can create an style agent swarm to hack anyone with 380k concurrent agents.
• Menu

  doc_ick
  Will admit that I haven’t read it yet, just saw the crazy number of authors and think this may compete for one of the papers with the most authors.
• throwaway7783
  Is this like agent substrate?
• Menu

  redat00
  So.. serverless ?
• Vaslo
  That number of authors though
• Menu

  swingboy
  Is there a lab more innovative than DeepSeek? Imagine if they had the same compute resources that Anthropic and OpenAI have.