<- Back
Comments (111)
- Skyy93This is a lobby organisation using only the pieces and bits they like to push their own agenda."sketchy russian website", how about using some more clear description like: A library for sharing books and articles that should be partly public domain because they were paid for by the public. Only some of the material is copyrighted by authors. However, some of their work is so old that it is not reprinted anyway.But of course such an explanation would not click.I also don't see a problem with statements about making people jobless. Imagine if every robotic or automation company advertised like this: Yeah, you'll buy tons of expensive robots and still rely on expensive labor from real people without any efficiency gains.
- handoflixueIt's wild how much weight "they're destroying jobs" has.I dare say that car manufacturers are aware of their impact on the horse and buggy industry. Calculator manufacturers wrecked the livelihood of mathematicians and accountants.Technology is in the business of putting people out of work, by inventing better ways of doing things. Or rather, any time you invent a better way of doing things, that's fundamentally going to disrupt all the businesses built around older technologies.
- papergirlNewly released court filings quote an OpenAI researcher saying: “I was just worried about optics - i.e. 'openai uses copyrighted data from sketchy russian website’ showing up on HN would be unfortunate."That's just one of several interesting quotes that have surfaced in documents from the Authors Guild's lawsuit against OpenAI.
- hn1rig3rakPulled datasets off libgen for a corpus once and it's overwhelmingly in-copyright textbooks, the public domain framing doesn't really hold up.
- alansaberNot even openai want to get flamed on show hn
- whatever1Is our opinion that important ? Nice !
- shaunpud
- sidcoolHN is their AB testing playground.
- monster_truckI could not care less
- hnfongCan we fix the title? This is clickbait for HN, the actual article's title is "Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Top Execs Knew Their Mass Book Piracy Was Illegal And Would Put Authors Out of Work"
- senectus1the AI isnt going to destroy jobs in numbers large enough to blip the unemployment stats more thna a qtr a percent.the economics of those companies will cause a catastrophic wipe out of jobs across the board.
- usernametaken29If this doesn’t put anyone in prison then we might as well declare copyright dead. They knew they broke the law and then they deliberately covered it up. How much more evidence is required here?
- anonundefined
- camillomiller[flagged]
- as1mov[flagged]
- peraCan some explain why would a billionaire like Altman care about the opinions expressed on HN?Given the political power they have, particularly now with the Trump administration, whatever "optics" exist on this forum seems completely insignificant
- AraneaDevLol, the fear mongering is just part of the hype train at this point.
- viliusIt’s 2030, I open HN and top result is from 7 hours ago, 2100 points, 700 comments:> AI agent accidentally publishes OpenAI’s unreleased model weightsThe optics are bad. The submission marks a turning page in human history.