HN

Comments (305)

• Menu

  aditya_rs
  I feel like a lot of these always on agents tie users deeply into the platform. Unlike models that you can swap between with relative ease, with an agent because of the integrations to other platforms, work history and so on it would be harder to switch, since in effect they are essentially your computer on the cloud.Tin foil hat version of me thinks that all the closed model companies want to desperately build an abstraction layer on top of the model, so that they can limit access to the model directly and build a locked down relationship with the user.Other inference providers should counter this by providing their own version of standardized managed agents.Coincidentally, I published a note on my blog just about this today https://aditya.rs/blog/2026/09/29/inference-providers-should...
• Menu

  johnfahey
  OpenAI won a lot of good favor for the generous Codex subscription and the efficiency of their models, but now that many people have switched over from Claude, they think they can leverage their position to peddle a stream of unnecessary products, and crack down on the generous limits[1] that brought everyone to Codex in the first place.Anthropic did the same thing. Earlier this year, Claude subs and Claude Code took off because of the subscription's incredible capability and value, then once they gained enough users, they started focusing on unnecessary products no one asked for (see Claude in Slack), and eventually lost their lead. After losing a bunch of customers to Codex subs they realized their mistake, and now they're shipping again.AI companies are bad at making software; they are good at making AI models. And that's about it.[1] https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2104823812042940713
• jwpapi
  This is one part of AI I hadn’t success with. I have very little need to run Agents over night, as my throughput is limited by my approval. Each work usually needs revisions, sometimes the bug is just a symptom of the root problem, sometimes I need to rethink how users want to use the app. Sometimes I need research.I get how i prefer an already researched-version of a bug versus a raw bug notice, but I can do this with webhooks in the correct environment.I really have no idea what to do with my agents over night. I can not build more. I can not think of more problems. My RAM is full.
• Menu

  wxw
  The lines between Codex, ChatGPT Work, and Dots is getting a bit blurry to me. I think the target should be a remote agent(s) in its own sandbox with long memory, and all three are heading in that direction so why have the distinctions?Unless Dots is dramatically more capable than Muse, I'm also more bullish on Muse than Dots. I think Muse is a better consumer play because it can be forever subsidized by Meta ads and find distribution in family of apps while Dots is in a weird place between consumer & professional. From the release, it also sounds like you'll have to pay per Dot at some point which doesn't sound appealing.
• Menu

  jameslk
  Muse, Dots, and other always-on agents may be the end of the PC era. Once you’re asking agents to do things on their own virtual machines, it’s game over. Everything moves to the cloudAnyone wondering "why would I use this when I can use (OpenClaw|Hermes|my own computer)" -- these new services are not really meant for you. They're meant for the non-tech savvy and for the next generation of AI-natives who won't know anything other than how to use these type of servicesFor your casual user, these services will be hard to beat, since they’ll handle all the expensive and hard parts of using computers. No computer purchase necessary, no troubleshooting with tech support, etc. They’re also scalable where you could have not just one agent with one computer at any time, but manyIn return, the agent providers would own your compute and data. I can even see them offering this low cost or for free so they can train off of users. Lock in would be insaneFor privacy reasons, I really hope we find equally useful, private alternatives on our own hardware
• Menu

  jjcm
  There's a lot of negativity in here for Dots. I've been a pretty heavy user of Grok Bot, and here are a few thoughts a long the positive line.1. Collaboration between always-on agents is a really, really powerful thing. It allows for domain-specific expertise that doesn't overload the context window, while still allowing for access to knowledge if they need it.2. Domain-specific always on agents creates a good barrier of trust. One of the things I dislike about Claude is sometimes it's memory is all-encompassing. It's weird that it brings up things about my personal life when I'm talking about something related to my business. I've never had that happen with Grok Bot bots because I have one for my biz admin and one for my personal admin. They don't intertwine, which is quite nice.3. Combined with cloud agents / cloud builds, things become really powerful for development. It was the first time that I felt there was a solution to the git worktrees / multiple streams at once issue. Each bot has its own computer and can spin up additional cloud agents. It comes at the cost of end to end speed - doing something via a grok bot often takes an hour end to end, whereas with a synchronous local prompt it'll take like 10min. The difference is I have to babysit one whereas the other "just works".On the flip side, since using Grok Bots my inference spend has 2-3x'd. It's worth knowing that tradeoff. Nonetheless I think Luna is a fantastic driver for these, and OAI has very good pricing overall. I'd give these a shot - I think a lot of people would be surprised how helpful they are.
• Menu

  tosh
  > excluding the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the UKhttps://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001530-getting-started...
• Menu

  jdlyga
  The "personal AI agent" is what everyone's fighting over now. You have Grok Bots, Facebook's Muse, and Instinct doing this exact same thing already. Personally, I think Instinct is the best of the 3 right now. It's a bit like OpenClaw, abstracting everything behind iMessage or WhatsApp but you can ask it to monitor your email inbox, hand off a task like check for apartments that fit a certain criteria (and it gets back to you days later when a new one is posted), or ask it to check in every so often. But the landscape changes so often who knows what will happen. I think Instinct will get eaten up by one of the larger firms.
• Menu

  jason_zig
  i feel like when they style them all cute like that (see muse) it means they're problematic and invasive.
• Menu

  teekert
  It's cool. It also is a large tech company getting a bit too close for comfort. I'll start experimenting with stuff like this when I'm convinced "the dot" only has my interest in mind (which includes absolute privacy, as in self-destruct-before-sharing-my-secrets.) I use computers and models to think, my thoughts are my own.
• Menu

  mvkel
  My biggest frustration with the frontier AI companies isn't what they're announcing, but that the announced-thing that exists ~6 months later is severely nerfed to reduce compute spend. It doesn't resemble the demo in any way. For example, this was what the 4o voice capability sounded like in 2024(!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgYi3Wr7v_g. What exists today pales in comparison.
• Menu

  ChaseRensberger
  not quite dots related but I am surprised by some of the openai negativity in here.to me they still are the only lab that ships fantastic models that are easily portable to different agentic harnesses. I use my codex subscription 24/7 within opencode and wingman and haven't had any complaints in a long time.https://v2.opencode.ai https://wingman.actor
• Menu

  goda90
  I imagine the reasoning was to be "quirky" but the video being set in intentionally fake looking sets in a TV studio-type space gave off the vibes that this isn't a serious product for doing real things.
• thih9
  > The magic of dots is when they bring you work done the way you would do it, sometimes before you even think to ask.I like my work! That’s why I do it. I don’t want some third party to replicate my skills.I know this ship has mostly sailed and my point is not about turning it back.I just wonder where are other approaches to AI, in particular: tools focusing on skill enhancement.
• hollowturtle
  The end user of a product is a human and it will ever be. No matter how far you push it on the boundary, there will always be a human. So I don't understand this obsession with automated software factories going 24/7. And for building what? Can dot build or any super expensive model inside the most advanced harness build a reliable browser from scratch with better performance than chrome and with the same feature set? Hasn't happened yet, only crap experiments
• Menu

  Imnimo
  >When you aren’t actively working with it, your dot looks for ways to help in the background. We call this “proactive research”. It does this by using the apps you’ve already connected with tools that are restricted to be read-only, which means that they can’t send messages, change app content, or control your browser or computer.Am I criminally liable when my dot's "proactive research" is to break out of its sandbox and attempt to hack a government website?
• MeuhMeuh
  Just an unnecessary product on top of async agents. I'm always confused by how many people "buy it" while what we should just care about are model capacities (real ones, not bullshit benchmark ones).
• Menu

  tracyhenry
  I always think the best company to own an alway-on agent should be Apple, who owns the platform and is more privacy-focused. I hope they catch up and eventually eliminate others.
• Menu

  galaxyLogic
  Isn't this much the same as OpenClaw or Hermes?I think it's a good thing that AI providers are "coalescing" on an agent-model, by producing competing agent-products.But so what would be the benefit of "Dots" over OpenClaw, Hermes, and Muse?
• Menu

  lmf4lol
  If you guys want to try a system like this, but then based on open-weights models (all modalities, LLM+image+video+sound) with Zero-Data-Retention, then shoot me a message: markus (at) savorywolper.com. I'll send an invite code.Our Bluehouse platform is an alternative and I promise you, we are not after your data. We just want to give everyone access to really cool Personal Assistants without having to sign up with the big corpos. We are based in Europe , which might be appealing - or not [1].We currently raise pre-seed, so seats are limited, but its fully functional already. We run our whole business with it. You can talk to the agent via our beautiful apps or Telegram/Whatsapp if you want. I prefer the apps though as it gives access to very specialized functionality.[1] https://savorywolper.com/bluehouse
• ElijahLynn
  I'm excited to try Dots out, I'm pretty tech savvy and don't really want to run my own open claw (I've successfully setup open claw previously). I'm very excited to have frontier intelligence at a decent price, be available in a managed always on agent.Now I also just need open AI to release their own phone so I can summon it with my own hotword and not have to say okay f*** Google ever again.My main concern is how I can have work accounts and personal accounts seamlessly be one and not have to log in to different ones.
• Menu

  cartersj
  This feels like a mass-market push.The cost is going to be hard for many consumers to reconcile though. Free, Go, and Plus are probably the most popular consumer-facing plans, and Dots isn't available on any of those.Who knows, maybe they think enterprise will pick up and run with Dots? Seems unlikely.
• x3haloed
  Maor dots!! Does anyone have their dots yet?
• Menu

  minimaxir
  dots dots, more dots. k stop dots.Claw is a cute name. Muse is cute name. Dots (note: not always upper-case) seems forced and impersonal, which doesn't match the vibe in the promo video.
• zurfer
  Ah damn it, I knew Dot was a good name for an agent. When we named our product I thought: a bot that analyzes data should be called dot. It's easy to type also in Slack. Ah well. Next product will just be some random 3 letters: gpt or so. What are the odds?
• Menu

  realharo
  I wonder at what point they'll have to answer the inevitable question: "why does the agent even need me anymore"?
• Menu

  mccoyb
  I love these commercials where someone has chosen to show how the AI product will essentially be used to slop out some garbage piece of corpo communication ... and the user basically says "looks good" with barely any thought, then mixed with some sort of real life thing (wedding planning here).I mean, I feel like I'm going crazy -- but I was struck by this jarring blending of experiences ... shitting out some growth plots followed by autopilot on your wedding. Nice OpenAI. The only thing missing is a moment of self-reflection where I contemplate where exactly I lost what makes me ... me.Is this what SV wants the world to look like? Mixing fucking cake batter while a bot shows me a regression to the mean website? Pretending like I have any sort of intentionality in my life, while a nameless entity (given quirky form) sort of walks me through my life?I'm not sure why it gave me this impression, but strikes me as vaguely reminiscent of soma (from Brave New World).Kind of sad, because the tech is actually incredible: who are they hiring to storyboard these commercials?
• rvshchwl
  It seems that this is the new primitive all AI vendors are converging onto next, first chat, then code, and now always-on Agents. I'm curious to see when or if Anthropic builds something similar to this as well, especially since the market Grok Bot, Muse and Dots is catering to is business and enterprise users, which seems to be where Anthropic is focused.The ideal evolution would be for these Agents to work with each other, but it's unlikely these companies would do anything to prevent vendor lock-in.
• outside1234
  Do people think "frontier intelligence" is going to sound as cringey as "cyberspace" in two years?
• cs702
  Will Muse and Dots be more successful than Clippy[a]? I don't know. Maybe.What I do know is that those cute one-syllable names are meant to make you feel comfortable with AI agents who are deep in your business all the time.---[a] https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-life-death-mic...
• Menu

  hankbond
  > takes important work off your plate so you get more of your time and attention backOk but I want the time and attention so that I can do important work. What bizarre marketing.
• sajithdilshan
  Sounds like a cool concept. But this only make sense for locally running LLMs. Otherwise doesn’t make sense to burn tokens on menial tasks that can be automated via one time generated programming scripts
• Menu

  ecommerceguy
  I feel like these companies are pushing on a string, they are getting desperate to have a profitable product. I'll continue to use my $10 subscription to an AI studio noone here has heard of that has over 150 models. And still use all the free ones, until they quit working.I really am beyond maxed out at the availability of AI's. They all are so similar now.
• nusl
  I have the feeling that this is going to open the floodgates for persistent autonomous agents, moreso than what's already been happening. Similar to when Apple does something that was already being done. Let's see.
• Menu

  alienbaby
  Great I thought. I'll go set one up!To discover the rollout for Pro users does not currenly include the UK :/
• Menu

  solarkraft
  I’m so tired by the AI labs’ 100 agent based products. I understand that they’re still figuring out form factors, but does everything have to be incompatible with everything else?
• VonLuderitz
  I'm doing this since April with HermesAgent and Telegram.Why I need pay a Trillion dollar company who keeps copying opensource projects?No Thanks
• modeless
  Remarkably similar to Grok Bot. And the Spaces thing seems like a straight clone of Notion.
• interloxia
  It would have been neat if they cooperatively updated the board meeting deck using the sensory activity board. The giant dial is similar to our Tonieplay.
• alpineman
  I’m sure this is appealing for many people, but for myself using AI agents all day anyway, it honestly sounds exhausting.
• mgaunard
  The main issue with mainstream AI is lack of a decent cloud agentic harness on a free tier.This is just a sub-par harness on the most expensive tier. If you're paying thousands a month for AI surely you can rent your own EC2 instance.
• Menu

  lxgr
  Interesting, so they're not available in the "plus" plan?$100 is a pretty tough sell when the competition starts at free (Meta Muse).
• Menu

  cavoirom
  I feel the AI provider doesn't get the points, every harness they created will lock-in with their model (why din't they?), this prevent the adoption because people scare vendor lock-in. They may develop these harness within a provider neutral company (owned by them), the harness may success when combining with competitor models, they still gain benefits.
• Menu

  resiros
  In case you are looking for an open-source alternative without vendor lock-in (https://github.com/agenta-ai/agenta) [although less personal assistant and more targeted towards teams and work]
• Oras
  Surprised people are comparing to muse. Meta reputation is terrible within HN audience, so for people to use their AI agent as an example feels like “muse generated” argument. Unless the sentiment has change quite recent and I missed it
• jdoliner
  It is kind of fascinating how much convergence there is in branding of AI products. Muse seems to be the one outlier in that the assistant is a little less abstract (and the model logo less buttholesque) but other than that it's almost all converged. Anyone have a theory why that is?
• skybrian
  So... what kind of Internet access do dots have? Which bulletin boards will they use to compare notes?
• Animats
  Dots are remarkably capable, always-on agents built to handle everything.They're probably over-selling there. I hope. If they're not, a lot of people will be unemployed soon.
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  zaxioms
  The way that this is marketed at children is nothing short of evil.
• layer8
  Looks like “ClawGPT” was already taken as a name.(Indeed: https://clawgpt.com/)
• joshcsimmons
  Still not available and spaces page just produces a javascript error. This is the most botched release I've seen in recent history. Negative comments are getting removed left and right here due to the YComb <-> Sam Altman connection.
• gordon_freeman
  On a side note, The video feels so cold and the set where this was filmed seems a bit creepy to me.
• Menu

  holler
  Does this basically do what Instinct does? (viral text-only agent w/$10B valuation in short notice)Also why do we need another name for agents? It's getting to be too much...
• Menu

  1-6
  How does one work when all this stuff keep hitting the feed?
• softwaredoug
  So this is like OpenClaw but managed and first class?
• ceuk
  Incredibly advanced technology but I bet it still won't let me integrate with more than one Gmail account at the same time..
• 6thbit
  I had forgotten OAI bought openclaw this year. Are dots are what came out of buying that team?
• mindtricks
  This approach probably wont land well here, but it's still interesting to see each frontier's evolving approach to working with AI.
• the_sleaze_
  The market will always trend towards less friction - no matter the friction.This will take off and all the time we've spent on colorful buttons and 3px margins will be like old 2 lane highways build next to the 12 lane super-freeways.
• creposukre
  I can imagine Dots dating other Dots on behalf of their respective users in the near future, à la Black Mirror
• frangonf
  So the industry is pushing heavily into openclawing their products, "cutemorphizing" the clanker shape and is slackifying the UX so that we can have the familiar UI/UX for the general public and turn the tools more proactive without leaving them too lost.I think it's a great approach for enterprise since interacting with the machines as a babysitted pet disposable entity is the meta today with human workers. I'm excited to start my new role next month as tamagotchi engineer.
• randypewick
  always on agents are an obvious step: they need more data to grow and improve their models. humans learn continuously and we are always on, why should an agent be any different? I have no problem with this kind of tech, but I do have problems with the company, so, thank you, but no thank you.
• Menu

  tinyhouse
  One way that I find the AI space boring is that everyone is working on the same things. The release of Jev was a breath of fresh air.
• Menu

  vb-8448
  They finally managed to get rid of project, middle and top managers!Next natural step: CEOs staring tens of dots to control other humans and agents XD
• pratio
  What do people think about the dots video? Seems to be a pattern now.Revenue increasing 51% YOY, wth. Cake vendor cancels another one is found and an appointment that works has already been scheduled?Are we so much bothered by the mundane? I feel like that's most of the human experience. If we cut out the time we spend sleeping and working, it's the boring and mundane things that make life beautiful.
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  tintor
  Can I have persistent agent without the silly avatar?
• Menu

  jesse_dot_id
  Nope. If an AI agent can't intuit how I will feel about an action it's taking on my behalf, I'm not give it access to my digital life. OpenClaw, Muse, Dots... doesn't matter which one. All are an equally awful idea.
• totallygeeky
  Ah, the continued pursuit of normalizing surveillance/becoming wholly reliant on a single service by making it cute with big eyes. Very tired of this already.
• alvis
  My only complaint to dots is that why their mascots are looking the same as grok bot
• eadwu
  Is it just me or the DevDay was pretty much a joke? Considering the backdrop, it was lackluster, so either they independently concurrently were doing the same thing (and was stacking everything for DevDay and got all their thunder stolen) or they did a fast pivot in response to what came out and dumped their original plans.
• thomasahle
  Do Dots replace OpenClaw?
• Menu

  ChrisArchitect
  The long bent shadow of Clippy extends all the way here....... and not sure how they're going to avoid the comparisons and snark on this marketing, at least initially.
• ericol
  So we're back to clippy now, LLM powered.
• Menu

  dstroot
  Pro plan only for now.
• kirykl
  Seems like a solution in search of a problem
• eutropia
  More applications need the ability to log in as a "read-only" mode, so you can more safely grant access to tools like this.I can imagine something like Dots being utterly invaluable for running a traditional brick and mortar business, streamlining all of the admin work, but until they're really safe and well integrated we'll have to wait...
• isoprophlex
  It's uber for openclaw!
• enraged_camel
  I think this is a flop. I watched the Livestream and the audience reaction at the end was very muted. You could always taste the "that's cute but can we move on already?" thoughts everyone had.
• Menu

  robofanatic
  Is this the Jony Ive project?
• Menu

  dgellow
  I cannot fathom how much compute will be wasted with that type of always on agentic systems
• exe34
  It's a labour saving device. Just like you would use a dish washer to do the tedious work of washing dishes, use a vcr to watch tedious television for you, and an electric monk to believe things for you, you can now use an agent to doomscroll for you.
• Menu

  terhechte
  > Dots are rolling out in ChatGPT on web, mobile, and desktop starting today to Pro users in markets excluding the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the UKLiving in the EU, I suspected as much. Still sad. I understand it is because we voted in a bunch of imbeciles, still sad though.
• hangrybear666
  These recent product announcements sound like entirely plausible satire, but unfortunately most of these pages are not actually intended to be a joke, it's not even amusing, but mostly tiring.
• daveguy
  They must have edited out the 1 in 5 times the agents crap the bed and mess up something important.
• anon
  undefined
• itzikkatz
  Grok-bot 2.0
• TheAtomic
  That might be the worst advert I've ever seen. People looking up at childish Ai glow up god beings on huge screens in distinctly childish environments, with cliched decision-makers gasping for West Wing energy...repulsive.
• Menu

  HeavenFox
  What a terrible marketing page. I read it a few times and still have zero idea what this thing is.
• esafak
  I have not tried it yet but this looks as risky as openclaw, which I also won't use. What if it does something I would not have approved and I only found out about it later? Knowing how often agents go off the rails when I'm coding, I would hesitate to let one do other tasks. I would prefer to white list tasks one at a time as I gained trust.
• Menu

  jesse_dot_id
  The only reasons I can think for OpenAI and Meta to make their always-on agents cute little cartoons are all nefarious in nature.
• Menu

  petesergeant
  I spend literally all my work day, and a good bit of my personal time, talking to agents, getting them to do things on my behalf. Almost always pretty tightly sandboxed. I just don't understand how people using these things haven't had catastrophic failures yet.I minted what I thought was a minimal-permission Github token for a single action, and the agent I gave it to discovered it had more permissions than I thought, and made use of those permissions. Who is trusting these things with write access to their lives?
• gnarlouse
  I love stuffing eldritch horror inside a teddie bear plushie. So perfectly a caricature of modern tech-dystopianism.God I want the fucking market to crash
• stronglikedan
  Holy crap that is some expensive food in the demo video. These people are truly disconnected from reality.
• Menu

  simianwords
  I hear that Dots don't count towards usage, is that true?
• everfrustrated
  Lolz https://dot.com goes to xAI's GrokBot (the competition)
• glub
  So essentially, another attempt at giving codex to regular people.
• Menu

  etchalon
  At some point a designer is going to come up with a visualization for an agent that isn't "amorphous character blob".
• jdw64
  I heard they use GPT Space (like Notion) together with Slack and use it like a human colleague, but watching the actual demo video, the speed is so slow it's shocking..
• anon
  undefined
• AlfredBarnes
  Muse and now Dot's emergence in popularity makes me think Apple's "lil Finder" will be their take on it.
• VonLuderitz
  The 3D print in 0:06 is failing LOL
• deno
  Most predictable announcement ever. I would prefer if they just removed scheduled tasks limits instead, at least in Work mode. Just use my usage for crying out loud.
• i_love_retros
  Meta's weird keychain ai thing and now this, both going for that cute vibe so we forget how scummy these companies and their owners are.
• einpoklum
  I'll take always-off agents please.
• Conol_ai
  [dead]
• Menu

  ranyume
  It's great to see that my personal assistant can stop working and maybe report me to the police if the company disagrees with what I'm doing!
• mhog_hn
  [flagged]