HN

Comments (91)

• Menu

  gizajob
  > The concept of "filesystem" is an increasingly weak concept.Yeah because Apple has broken that idea over and over and over. The anti-unix unix.
• Menu

  ssivark
  Interesting and expansive post about what the modern desktop experience should be like, and most of it has nothing to do with Tmux except if you squint in some very particular way.
• mattbrewsbytes
  This topic is similar to jigs in woodworking - you can get all fancy and over-engineer it but in the end, does it improve the product/output? If a fancy jig and a gross looking home-made jig both produce a 90 degree corner, what is the added benefit?I think people put way too much emphasis on things like this with conclusions that they are faster and therefore its better. There is Pareto's law and a point of no return on invested time with this type of endeavor. I would feel better if people started off with "I did this because I can and I like doing things like this" vs. some argument that its better in some way.
• Menu

  ggm
  how can this not refer to emacs?emacs -> screen -> tmux -> tmux integrated into <terminal app>appears to be the path.I guess the fork was "emacs before X" to "emacs after X but we retrofiited some ideas from X into the terminal" -> <the rest is history>
• Menu

  anonreplier
  Niri or Umbriel with Noctalia shell is a wonderful experience, you can get similar on Mac with OmniWM. I briefly tried komorebi for windows too.
• Menu

  phromo
  Too bad config is a no go for the poster, otherwise hyprland or i3 would do everything, even the quake overlay.
• Menu

  chuliomartinez
  Interesting idea. My problem is that one “stream” usually spans multiple apps that silo data. So i have an email from a client and command line and a tab in chrome and maybe a note and an excel file. There are of course exceptions to this, but in real life we bring tools to the project not the other way around. Naturally some “projects” might have sub projects, or some might be transient - a quick email reply. You might organize your digital life this way - with virtual desktops, but why can’t the computer keep track?
• Menu

  erelong
  Vertical tabs is a feature in some modern browsers (all?), toggled in settingsVirtual desktops might help some people where you just ctrl+alt+left/right to move to them, instead of multiple monitors (where applicable). Or just fullscreen apps and I think it's like ctrl+tab to switch between a bunch of themThe only way to keep all the files on the filesystem is probably to avoid the silosI guess we could ironically / unironically ask AI for some OS design tips for our setups haha
• wosined
  Many of these problems were already considered and solved by Xah Lee. Watch some of his videos on window management. You will see that tiling or docking windows are always suboptimal. You only need a good set of shortcuts to switching between windows so that you use the mouse less. I also have shortcuts bound to resizing windows to fixed sizes. This is all I am going to tell you. Figure out the rest.
• Menu

  agumonkey
  I was wondering who would use small LLM to improve layout, selection and switching of windows.. pretty fun.
• Menu

  serbuvlad
  > The best two examples of this are the Arc browser and Chrome OS. But I think Arc is actually the more interesting of the two experiments. Their first innovation was to break the idea of tabs at the top and instead move it to be a sidebar model.I will forever hate Arc for popularizing vertical tabs the way they did.Vertical tabs were a thing since at least the Tree Style Tabs extension (2007), except the Tree Style Tabs were infinitely cooler, because they were a tree, not a list, and right click->open in new tab, would open the new tab as a child of the current tab.So you could have a hacker news tab during your break, start opening a bunch of articles, read through them, simply un-expand the HN sub-tree, go to work, and then re-expand it during your next break.Because of Arc, everyone is now implementing vertical tabs, but no one is implementing Tree Style Tabs, and, probably no one ever will again.
• Menu

  jwrallie
  Persistence is something I care about, Tmux allow that between different sessions, local or otherwise, Windows Remote Desktop also makes it simple to continue work remotely. What bothers me is that the OS will eventually need to reboot, and the user is expected to reconfigure the sessions afterwards, at least partially.I think a modern computer should be able to update its software, kernel included, in a way that the state of the userland could be kept, even with an actual reboot.
• Menu

  xlii
  I solved exactly that problem I and I sell it to those willing: https://race-term.comIt is multiplexer so survives app kills, and interface is heavily keyboard driven.I tried running email in it though resigned (and guess what, wrote my own) because HTML email support is must have nowadays.
• nmstoker
  I very nearly didn't check this out because I didn't realise the focus was going to be much more general OS, but it's a great piece, well thought through.
• drooopy
  So, a tiling WM?
• danrobi
  My answer to this: EXWM or Ratpoison
• Menu

  deadbunny
  Or use a twm
• OtomotO
  Actually for me it's different.I've been using Tmux and later Zellij for many years, while I was on Ubuntu's Unity, then Gnome, KDE, i3 and lastly sway.Until I switched to niri (https://github.com/niri-wm/niri) ... since then I haven't used tmux at all.Very weird, come to think of.
• Menu

  estetlinus
  Love it. High recognition factor. The only things that matter this side of the AI-revolution is window management> I don't have a single fucking clue how MacOS populates this windowNobody does, but it’s provocative! Gets the people going!I’ve leaned into Aerospace for window management, herdr for terminal and good ol’ Chrome for browsing.I put my hope to Superlogical by the Ghostty-guy to solve all my MUX problems
• Menu

  cess11
  Kind of weird that the author does not make clear what a "normal person" is, despite this being a central concept to their article.Personally I don't think it is normal to be unable to double click on i3wm in some graphical apt wrapper and then pick it from a scroll list at login. People use shortcuts in Windows all the time. Having more than one workspace might have been foreign to most a decade or two ago, but these days external monitors are common and workspaces are basically that.I've seen people who I would not consider abnormal go from weird misconceptions about i3wm to efficiently sending around windows between workspaces and screens in a day. If you want you can also click your way through it, and configuration is generated for you after you decide whether you want Alt or Super as the core command key. Defaults are rather sensible, so you don't have to fiddle with them until you've got some experience.Historically user interfaces on web pages and in Windows and Mac OS:s has changed quite a bit and people who I think most would consider normal managed to adapt.
• krautburglar
  This talk about "the future" is nonsense. UI is art, not engineering. What some love, others will inevitably hate. This is where unix/linux is light-years ahead of the competition. Unlike Windows/OSX/iOS, you can make your own mixtape.That, and Steve Jobs died a long-ass time ago. The hand-wringing over "config files" in the age of qwen3 you can run on a 10-year-old GPU is no longer as relevant as it once was. Language got us this far. The checkboxes and picklists of PARC were a detour that is now (thankfully) in our rear-view mirror. Config files are awesome.t. i3 user
• Menu

  noodletheworld
  > Filesystems as a weak abstraction.Is a concept the author needs to get over.> The ideal would be "across my entire computer and applications, what are the recent files I have interacted with" and expand that out to include emails and Teams/Slacks and everything. I should be able to see everything going on with my machine, search through it and not care if its stored inside of Slack or iCloud or whatever. Single pane of glass.Nope. This would be great if it worked.This idea of getting rid of the file system is very old, tired and has failed. And failed. And failed.…and you know apps hate? Letting you out of their walled gardens.> Microsoft tried it, people didn't like it,Yup.> but I think the concept makes sense.Nope.You’re going to have to do better than trying this again.Something something local LLM? Mm.It’s a Hard Problem. The kind of problem that random engineers look at and go “doesn’t seem that hard, I could do that in a weekend”.…> In the interest of full disclosure I think this is gonna take many weekends of work to even get a functional demo running. So I'll do my best, but be patient.Okay, to be fair, the author did acknowledge that it’s a lot of work and it’s hard; and I look forward to seeing the result, because experiments in this space are interesting, the idea of a visual tmux maybe has some legs……but I think this project is too ambitious to succeed.Not being the default isn't what stops these concept desktops from taking off; it’s that people don’t like them.No file system, you just get “tasks” and an LLM to pray to and hope you get your data from?:/ I don’t think it’ll fly.
• takehomelab
  [flagged]
• haroldopina
  [flagged]
• anon
  undefined
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  kmarc
  I like articles that discuss out of ordinary approaches. This is one of those, and I relate to the pain the writer also has.However...> Different people use windows totally differently.The older I get, the more impatient I am with this. In the industry, we normalized that high paid software developers (who are way better programmers, or infra people than I am) waste hundreds of engineering hours with their absolutely broken window management, and command-tab hell. Whenever I have to witness a screenshare of a colleague, my time is also wasted.I wish this would be an interview gating: show us how you manage yourself in this big monorepo, switching tasks, windows, tabs, desktops, SSHs etc. Do not normalize noob time wasting.Different people also use pianos differently. Yet, we don't appreciate a noob pushing random keys around it. It would be unpleasant to the ear, just how unpleasant (painful) it is to witness macOSs/gnomes bubblegum horror of sloppily animated chaos.Back to my point: windows (as in viewports) are with us for many decades. I don't care if you tile, stack, infinite scroll them. Just be productive. Invest upfront in learning, be fast, and be able to explain what I you try to show me on screen.There will be no one size fits for all, and that part I understand. But please have more dexterity with your desktop abilities than my grandma.