<- Back
Comments (58)
- phyzomeI'd like to see this framed as a ban on surreptitious recording, not specific to glasses. But it's a little hard to figure out exactly what the parameters should be.
- indoordin0saur> Norway Eyes Partial Ban of Smart GlassesI see what you did there.
- acdHope Sweden copies Norway and bans data fusion for ads data sharing glasses.
- laxdA temporary measure. Knowing the current regime they will use years & millions on comittees, reports, reviews, expert groups and all kinds of bureaucratic wage labor I don't have english vocabulary for. And then, the EU, which we a not a member of, decides everything behind our back.
- eecksWhy isn't the publishing of the captured video banned? If you want to upload content involving someone else (not just in the background) in it then you should need consent.
- vkdeltaHow is different from another device ? Phone, digital camera, etc .. someone can use that for taking the same photo ..Is it the added convenience of the glasses?
- thadt> The ban could apply to parks, beaches, museums, shopping centres, schools, daycare centres, healthcare facilities, gyms and public events.True - many places where photography and video recording by people and organizations is already done on a broad scale with both smartphones and infrastructure cameras.> "We do not want a society where people worry about being recorded without their knowledge, photographed, or filmed in places and situations where they are accustomed to not being monitored"... I think we're gonna need a bigger ban
- thangalinThis is short-sighted; smart contacts are viable.https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-51137379