<- Back
Comments (69)
- flaburganWhile I find it great that Claude is now helping people to progress on topics they may have not have time or knowledge for before, I found it a bit sad that this is done alone in a bedroom. NASA and ESA do have this kind of program, where they publish data and encourage people to help. There is exactly this for exoplanet searching:- NASA (with the TESS mission): https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/nora-dot-eisner/planet-h...- ESA (with the CHEOPS mission): https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/bmerin/planet-hunters-ch... (Very new! Will be announced next week!)If you are logged in with an account they will even recognise you and add your name to the paper!So instead of playing alone, join the common effort, this is how science will progress efficiently!
- londons_exploreWhy wasn't this found before?Surely 'take all observations of the sky and for every visible star do a frequency analysis' is step 1 when looking for planets?
- fsniperOh no more old.reddit? I can't read this without an app? Absolutely no.. This is bonkers.
- colijoblesBrilliant application. Imagine the progress we could make with models post trained on scientific process and a good agentic process.I've been tinkering with the latter for the last couple of months. Yesterday my system made some progress on instabilities on a particular superconductive system: https://colinocallaghan.com/autonomous-ai-research/Spatial-P...
- flyinglizardIt’s written as if this was Claude congratulating itself.
- ContinuityLabCool discovery, but I'd be real curious about the false-positive rate when letting coding agents loose on raw astronomical telemetry. Hallucinations in data reduction are no joke.
- __aliasLaughed at the reddit comment> "We got vibe astronomy before GTA6"
- soltanovCall me when peer review confirms it; until then, it is noise fitting noise. (Reason: Clean cut through the hype directly to scientific validation.)
- dkpkI’m sure we’ll find Planet Nine soon.
- hmynjust this line "I chose what questions to ask, what tests mattered, and what counted as pass/fail."
- k310Planet Claude?Asking for a friend.
- higeorge13This is incredible use of AI tools. Big kudos!
- elzbardicoPlot twist: The discovery is valid. But we figure out the author was not a innocent PM, but a team of astronomers working for Anthropic, And Anthropic's marketing department come up with the idea of crediting it to a PM. :-D
- wartywhoa23Found a planet and saved a granny. Wake me up when this planet is acknowledged by any astonomer community with more say than r/ClaudeAI.
- _fuchs[flagged]
- amirkhanianNot an astronomer, but I'm a non-programmer who spent two months building a fairly big web app with Claude, so the false-positive question is the one I'd ask too.What saved me wasn't asking Claude whether it was right (it almost always says yes). It was checks that don't depend on its own report: run it on data where you already know the answer, and give a fresh session only the result and ask it to break it.For a planet hunt I guess that means hiding a few fake planets in real data to see if it finds them, and running the same pipeline on shuffled data to see how many "planets" it finds in pure noise.
- thatguy0900I truly cannot stand the dramatic way ai writes posts like this. It talks with the gravitas of someone announcing a world shaking event every time. It annoys me to no end.
- VCFundedGenYer[flagged]