HN

Comments (127)

• elevation
  There was a time when I would have bought one, or recommend that a family member buy one, but I've had the same ubiquiti APs for years and I'm happy. If you sell reliable hardware, it will take you many years to see repeat business.If you start this business, bootstrap -- don't go into debt. If you have 100 units on your shelf, you'll sell them eventually. If you have a large loan, you'll have the bank breathing down your neck -- not worth it for the margins you're after.At small scale you can economize on shipping by finding a small business that does a lot of receiving and intercepting their cartons and packing material. You can tell if the business's cartons are right for you by glancing at their corrugated cardboard dumpster, but if you ask, they may be happy to give you a load of boxes that they did not already break down.Sell on eBay/Amazon, but also list your items directly on a website you control where you can bypass their fees. Perhaps the price is the same, but your site can be more profitable. Amazon may de-list you for offering a direct price that's lower than you list for on their site -- but you may be able to bypass this with a coupon code.If you get good at shipping reflashed OpenWRT routers you will probably not be netting six figures. But by developing the skills of effective marketing and fulfillment, you may find a complementary product that is even more profitable at a similar volume to a similar customer base. The business you build selling routers can make another business idea take off even more quickly.
• Menu

  nr378
  I think OpenWrt is the more significant project nowadays, and routers with OpenWrt pre-installed are already available
• Menu

  mushufasa
  So I actually did buy DD-WRT pre-installed on a refurbished router from a company called FlashRouters. My experience was pretty good, the router lasted ~4 years until the hardware failed. I decided not to buy my next router from the same company afterwards, for two reasons1. they automatically enrolled me in a 'support' subscription I didn't want and I didn't realize until it renewed once, then I cancelled. it's apparently not easy selling flashed routers.I don't begrudge them for this, though: I'm guessing they actually do have a lot of users contact support, and this business practice was a rock and a hard place situation: you don't want users to fail to install the device nor to have a bad experience because you can't afford a skilled support team. I'm not sure if they have since changed their policies.2. I learned that, all along, ASUS has built their routers on a company-maintained downstream flavor of WRT.So I just bought an ASUS router and haven't looked back. When I first set it up I was able to go into the admin ui and configure it similarly to how I had configured DD-WRT.
• Menu

  II2II
  > When I asked an AI how I would go about judging interest, building, raising funds, and manufacturing, it seems doable but expensiveJust a thought: make a small business out of setting up people's home networks and small business networks. The cost is negligible, you will learn about unmet demand, and you will be able to reach people who aren't technical in the process. It will cost you some money, in the sense that your service fees would almost certainly be less than your day job. On the other hand, potential customers would be paying you for market research and product development. In some respects, the market research will be more valuable in the sense that you are working with potential customers.I say potential customers because selling a kit will reach different people. On the otherhand, it will tell you what has to go into that kit. For example: I doubt that flashing DD-WRT to existing hardware will suffice. There will be some people interested in that (someone else does the research, fear of bricking), but would those people commit to buying and setting up your product? Throw in a setup wizard that makes setting up ad blocking, VPN, or anything else that major vendors don't have much interest in simplifying, and you will likely have more success.
• nvarsj
  OpenWRT - not sure why anyone would want to use dd-wrt?I’ve thought about this as well, you could market it to gamers or content creators who care about latency. Nano pi r6s with openwrt and buffer bloat configured for their connection. Nicer/simpler UX on top maybe.Firewalla did something similar but imo their UX is nice but actual product isn’t great (lots of issues on gigabit links ime, overpriced).
• Menu

  BLKNSLVR
  My idea is one step further: selling the device with various ad-blocking and user-selectable tiers of security configuration included. Stop your devices spying on you, detect/notify if you have any infected devices on your network. That kind of thing.Similarly though, there's limited appeal to those who aren't already capable of setting it up themselves.I'm still slowly pursuing this because I believe in it, whether it's profitable or not.Edited to add: Part of what I'm setting up: https://lists.uninvitedactivity.com/DNS/, a vague explainer here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990394
• Menu

  lobster2342
  So for my part, I wouldn't fancy dd wrt but a good router with openwrt pre-flashed. Yes, I can flash it myself, but I am wealthy enough to pay the additional flash fee and rather save the time.What I have in mind (if my dayjob fires me): open a shop for wealthy nerds, and sell all kind of pre-flashed devices, known to work well with open source firmware: power plugs, routers, thermostats,... The clientele would be very niche, but I think it might be enough for a small specialized shop.
• Menu

  karelpeeters
  Tomaž Zaman is working on something similar, an open source router. The process of building both the product and the company is well documented on his channel: https://www.youtube.com/@tomazzaman/featured. The company website is here: https://mono.si/
• Menu

  dpark
  There is basically no market for this. The set of humans who want a turnkey DD-WRT-type solution is functionally nonexistent. The target audience for this is people who won’t actually tinker with it but want to imagine they would. Anyone who would actually tinker with it doesn’t need it preinstalled.Dropbox is an odd comparison because it’s not the hacker solution at all. The market for Dropbox is indeed normal folks who do not want to tinker. They want it to just work. (I buy Ubiquiti because I want it to just work.)
• Menu

  mcoliver
  You're approaching this from the wrong angle it's not the technology in the router average people are buying. They care about ease of use, reliability, and features. In that order. Dropbox won because it provided rsync in an easy to understand product. If ddwrt allows you to build features into routers that have good UX for average people then you win. What would those features be? That's the work you should be doingOff the top of my head. A mobile app for setting up and remotely monitoring and controlling my home network. Pihole/pivpn built in with wireguard and a good UX for creating tunnels. Host isolation. A local llm that I can ask questions and get fixed (why can't I print to the printer from my laptop on ssid1. Fix it). Kid friendly things for parents. Easy kid schedules and device groups to limit screen time and reports on what sites they visited.Ubiquitis amplifi app had a decent mobile app with some of these things.Go after the product not the technology.
• Menu

  MisterMunchkin
  99.99% of people don't even buy routers, they just use the free one that comes with the connection.For people who do buy them, there's a number of good products out there already. Why would I trust a new product from a single person, which might drop out of support after 6 months?
• Menu

  xingped
  What I really want and haven't seen is a proper mesh router setup that runs DD-WRT or something open-source. In bigger homes really a mesh system is your best hope since your internet access usually comes in on a corner somewhere, but I really don't trust any of the options I have (with the possible exception of one, whose name escapes me at the moment).
• Menu

  suprjami
  No, I want a router with OpenWrt pre-installed.So I buy GL.iNet routers, which come with OpenWrt pre-installed.
• jonahbenton
  I buy hardware from a us provider ( thinkpenguin), who have something like this, and from a european provider (turris) who also do. It is a potential business with discriminating customers. If the goal is dd-wrt, I would banish the thought of anything near mass market (Walmart/Best Buy)- you have to be doing millions of units to even get into that conversation and dd-wrt is not the vehicle to sell to millions. But if you are looking for opportunity, local llm friendly home device integration of which the edge router is a small part, and of which dd-wrt is irrelevant, is a big wide open space.
• 9x39
  Dropbox had basically no competition at the time as the idea of cloud files was barely in the market.Meanwhile, home routers with meshing and security and built-in cloud management planes with easy apps are already cheap.What would your pitch be when mom & dad would probably just stumble on Amazon Eero or Netgear Orbi? Someone already brought fire back to the home market, you can't differentiate if you're just putting up a site and a device, unless you hit some absurd low-$ cost in an already low-margin industry.You'd be better off looking for a niche or industry where the edges are sharp, the tooling is bad or inconsistent, and there's no clear winner.
• Menu

  someperson
  I used to use dd-wrt, but I later settled on ASUS routers, and installing "ASUS Merlin" firmware on them.I find ASUS hardware high quality in general. And using an open-source project like ASUS Merlin means the pain-points and limitations that I would face with stock firmware have been resolved to (at least to satisfactory extent) when I need reach for the hacker type configurations.
• FishermanSequen
  DD-WRT doesn't upgrade the Linux kernel in the device you flash it to - this is what enables it to use the closed-source drivers that A) require a specific Linux kernel version and B) are typically a Broadcom thing. You're still getting a more stable and performant device in most cases but not necessarily a more secure one or one with newer kernel features. So I prefer OpenWRT and devices that allow OpenWRT to fully work.> I would buy a low-power SFF PC with dual NICs, run OPNsense or OpenWrt, and use the wireless routers strictly as access points.If you can fish an old PC with a few GB of RAM made since 2006 or so out of the trash, you're halfway there. Get a cheap 32GB SSD and a second PCIe NIC off of Amazon, and go for it. You can run OpenWRT on x86.
• code-blooded
  I'd like a reliable and inexpensive router with OpenWrt.It's a difficult market though:- Vast majority people use router provided by ISP. - Some unhappy with ISP hardware quality buy whatever they find online (in my country usually TP-Link devices) - Enthusiasts flash OpenWrt on cheap devices, home servers or buy MikroTik devices (or similar). - Non enthusiasts, but caring about quality and support still have some good (but more expensive) devices to pick from like Fritz!Box in EuropePeople wanting pre-flashed OpenWrt will be fraction of a fraction of overall market, so you'd need to charge a lot, which puts you in direct competition with options above.
• Leonard_of_Q
  While it is good to have choice in commercial routers I haven't used one for a long time, instead running a virtual router on the same machine (an ex-lease DL380 G7, these have 4 ethernet ports) which hosts all services. I use a number of commercial Wifi-equipped routers as access points, these all have OpenWRT installed and all routing functionality is disabled. There's a managed 24-port switch in between the DL380 and the outside world which gets fed VLANs and separated these out into individual ports for specific hardware - printers etc. - and some of the commercial Wifi-routers also split out VLANs to their switch ports which connect to specific devices like solar inverters etc. Everything is built around OpenWRT, this includes the virtual router which is based on an X64 OpenWRT image running under ProxMox. The whole setup has been running for about 7 years now without any significant problems.
• trollbridge
  At this point it’s generally cheaper for the things I want (10G/2.5G ports; frequent security updates; advanced routing including site to site VPNs; very fast boot times; ability to have two redundant routers) to simply have an old PC where I can control those things.
• jaekwon
  yes but i want it to function as a software defined radio too. https://github.com/h0m3us3r/w1700k-sdralso it better be open hardware.sign me up take my money. jae@gnomail.io
• jimnotgym
  Don't you just launch a good router? Some people will be attracted by the open source firmware. Some will be attached by a good router. You will be attracted by not having to write firmware.Another way of looking at this, find an industry or community that have particular needs in a router and sell to them
• whazor
  I got two GL.Inet devices:- Flint 2: very happy with this. I can do any kind of OpenWRT setting I want- Flint 3: super unhappy!! changing VLAN settings breaks the entire router.Why? Flint 3 uses a chip with encrypted vendor blob (Qualcomm) and Gl.inet just hacked the drivers in a way is not compatible with OpenWRT.But maybe I should let an agent reverse engineer the driver and add correct support myself?Edit: i haven't checked the status in a while, but seems like last months support for this device changed a lot.
• Menu

  MaKey
  > So, do you actually want a router that you can buy with DD-WRT pre-installed?No, I'd rather flash it myself and use OpenWrt instead of DD-WRT.
• happyPersonR
  Wouldn’t trust it at this point … but what I would trust is a blank router that has a GitHub repo with a containerized build that I could run on my own machine and something ai ish that lets me flash it :)Would be legit to be able to have an Llm do a source audit before installing …. Not perfect but damn sure better than nothing
• Menu

  bigthymer
  I don't think it will work as a business. The people who want dd-wrt will just install it themselves, not pay additional for it to already be installed. However, I do think you may be able to sell an ad-blocking router with ad-blocking already installed. I think people may consider that enough of a feature to pay for.
• vintagedave
  Check out TekLager. They're Swedish, and I've bought a router from them before - excellent build quality. I think they make or made several themselves, possibly from pre-existing designs (unsure how open source the hardware is.) They can come pre-installed with various open source OSes.https://teklager.se/en/Not affiliated, just a happy customer. If you're thinking of getting in a similar business and are not a competitor in Sweden, drop them a line. When I spoke to them they were very friendly.
• runjake
  No, I'd just do it myself with a trusted image, and save myself some money.
• 4d4m
  There are a few that support DD-WRT out of the box, but the greater opportunity is in bringing open source firmware to everyone!
• INTPenis
  Already have one, bought from a local Swedish store that flashes things like OpnSense and Dd-wrt on devices they sell.
• somerandom2407
  I'd only be interested in a platform I could trust completely, with no proprietary firmware or software blobs required. Short of that, if I have to trust someone, I'm probably just going to trust Cisco or Ubiquiti given they're western and have been around for a while with a relatively good track record and a lot of money to lose if they're found to have been negligent or malicious.I think there's a market there for a fully open platform, but it's probably not very easy to pull off given how secretive the chip vendors seem to be.
• e12e
  Well, I just bought a:https://www.gl-inet.com/en-de/products/gl-be14000so.. yes? I haven't gotten around to flashing stock openwrt on it - but I probably will at some point - seems to be supported now?https://forum.gl-inet.com/t/flint-4-openwrt-vanilla/71383/10I think it would be difficult to compete with existing offerings - even though they are quite few.
• Telaneo
  I want it, in the same way I want a laptop with Linux. I can install it myself, and I already have done, but I wish the option was viable for most others, so that more of the market is open source.For routers, the only realistic way that can happen is by getting some big vendor to adopt ddwrt or openwrt to offload (some of) the job of writing the firmware. And even then, most people use their ISP provided router. A niche vendor supplying preflashed routers isn't going to make a dent.
• Menu

  isityettime
  I generally prefer vanilla OpwnWRT or maaaaaaybe one of the nicer Tomato forks.There's a Hong Kong company called GL-iNet which makes routers whose OEM firmware is just OpenWRT plus their own web interface, but they actually also have the stock one from upstream pre-installed as well.I've bought routers from them for years. I usually make sure that they're fully supported in a stable upstream release of OpenWRT, then replace the firmware with vanilla, which is no fuss. Then they continue to get firmware upgrades for many years.DD-WRT I think of as a messy thing for backporting as many features as possible to routers that are locked to old kernels because they rely on super proprietary radio firmware blobs.Take a look at GL-iNet, the WRT routers from Linksys, and the OpnWRT One or whatever it was, and try to figure out where you might fit in that landscape. Maybe you can support some features they don't, maybe you can take a radical upstream-first approach to appeal to free software enthusiasts, or maybe you can market to Americans who want manufacturer based in their own country. But those are antecedents who may also be your competitors, so it's with seeing what they're doing.
• 1vuio0pswjnm7
  "So, do you actuallly want a router with DD-WRT pre-installed?"I bought a router with no OS pre-installedI chose Coreboot to be pre-installed as a convenienceI prefer to boot from USB stick or the network; there's no secondary storage, only max amount of RAM, no WifiThe computer is sold as a "router". But for me any computer that runs a kernel I have enabled to forward packets is a "router" and any "router" is a computer I can use for any purpose (within the limits of the hardware)
• alt227
  I want a router that doesnt come with Open-WRT or DD-WRT flashed, but releases their chipset drivers for full compatibility if I want to flash myself.
• Menu

  drnick1
  > Do you want a router that has DD-WRT pre-installed?No, not really. I build my own routers using commodity hardware and Debian. If I had to go back to consumer hardware, I would get a GL.Inet or other off-the-shelf router that supports OpenWrt and flash it.
• skew-aberration
  There are some Chinese companies making more open router dev boards like Banana Pi R4. You can install openwrt out of the box. But generally, the SoCs that power the current generation of routers are locked down / highly proprietary (and always have been). It's the chips, not the boards, which matter most.
• rtaylorgarlock
  Happy OPNsense user here, with no current plans to change. Ruckus unleashed + brocade ICX treat me very well. The all-in-one router indeed are only access points to me, and I don't exactly wish 'only having an AIO router' on people.
• WarOnPrivacy
  I just bought a used Extreme Networks AP that shipped with OpenWRT installed. I appreciated the convenience of something that was partly done before I got it.It's currently serving as a wireless bridge client for a network of 10 IP cameras.
• Menu

  tkel
  DD-WRT isn't open-source though. OpenWRT is.
• ValdikSS
  DD-wrt is not a free software, and they sell licenses on their website. Does its license allows redistribution and/or selling the routers?
• IllIIlIlIlIIIIl
  You need to remind yourself that the overwhelming majority of populace are not HN users. Most just want a cheap "internet box" that gives them WiFi. If any had interest in going deeper into networking, they would build a router themselves. But if you had some extra unique features on top of DD-WRT, that might turn a few heads. I do recall Tomaz Zaman on Youtube building their own router completely from scratch - not saying it's 100% what you plan on doing, just a reference point for you to look at.
• Menu

  tombert
  I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I think that routers are a pretty geeky thing that most people don't want to hear about. I had offered to buy and set up a pfsense router for my parents for a few years ago and they were decidedly not interested, even after I tried explaining the merits of it. Pretty much anyone who is going to be interested in DD-WRT is going to be someone who can set it up themselves.pfsense can sell for a relatively high price, I think, because they market themselves more towards businesses and big corporations.
• m463
  get a gl.inet routerthey are not prohibitively expensive and have a version of openwrt installedif anything, you are sure to be able to install openwrt on them yourselfif you get good at openwrt you can install it on other parts of your home network like the zyxel gs1900 series switches for up to 48 portsthe reason not to install off-the-shelf consumer routers is privacy, security and enshittification
• _doctor_love
  All my routers run TOMATO
• Menu

  comex
  The OpenWrt One is really not a great piece of hardware. No 6GHz, and only two Ethernet ports, one of which is only 1Gbit. The latest GL.iNet products are apparently better, but also apparently don't run stock OpenWrt, only a fork of it. In other words, there's still plenty of room in the market for good routers with open-source firmware.
• nonameiguess
  I did build my own router, two actually, but opted into buying one of the Deciso appliances with OPNSense pre-installed for the main WAN connection from my house to the ISP upstream.The biggest reason I did that is that I wanted four ports, not two, and I could not find a mini-ITX motherboard or any other commodity form factor with four ports built-in. Once you have to add an expansion card, you need a case quite a bit larger than what you're used to for a home network appliance.That's an underfilled niche, small form factor single boards with more than two high-speed NICs, but presumably it's underfilled for a reason, which is there aren't many individual consumers, as opposed to third-party packagers like Deciso who sell appliances to enterprises, who want these. The other consideration is server-grade mini-ITX boards that have even two onboard NICs have a whole lot of other features not needed in a networking appliance that end up consuming more power than is ideal. If you could offer such boards, with or without a case, with or without a pre-installed operating system, I'd definitely be interested, but I'm one guy. Don't build a business on scratching the itch of notoriously stingy homelab enthusiasts. We're the kind of people who will gladly pay $400 a week on groceries and then scoff at a $10 a year software subscription as something unconscionable.
• 1317
  Not particularly to be honest, I'm fine with the one my ISP gave me
• steele
  Yes. With upgradable radios.
• gitowiec
  Yes I do. And also RouterOS seems good alternate for me
• Menu

  jasonjayr
  Interesting related question -- I recently inherited several WiFI AP/Routers that are openwrt or DDWRT compatible. Are there any packages that folks are working on, or know of that can centrally manage a fleet of them?If there wasn't, I was going to use this as a project to explore vibecoding...
• gxs
  I'll tell you what i wouldn't get - if you have an asus router, i'd steer clear of merlinThey leave a bunch of data sharing options built in and on by default with no warning, acknowledgement, etc and I suspect it's why asus lets the project continue to run
• sneak
  I am a very very happy GL.iNet customer, and probably have 10+ of their devices.
• fragmede
  Glinet routers are already this.Buy https://www.gl-inet.com/en-us/products/gl-mt3600be and move on with your life.Alternately, what's the problem you're trying to solve? Who are your potential customers? Why do existing options in the market not address their needs?
• mrheosuper
  Many stock Firmware is just OpenWRT with fancy interface. I remember Asus being one.
• Muhammad523
  I'd love that!
• mrlonglong
  The openwrt ones are usually better.
• ipunchghosts
  Yes, or open Wrt
• justsomehnguy
  The most important thing here is the price and with a low volume you would never hit the low price per unit.And the person which knows what DD-WRT is knows where and how to get it for a good (for them) price.So you target audience is already has their needs fulfilled and you don't add any additional value worth the increased price.
• Menu

  emacdona
  Wow, the timing of this question is eerie. Just last week, I got tired of talking about segmenting my network but never doing it. So I did some research, asked some friends, and settled on the following:* An Opnsense firewall (purchased from Deciso; ie: "official" hardware)* An OpenWRT One (ie: "official" hardware) to be used as an access point* A Microtik switch (SW OS, not Router OS)My plan is to create multiple SSIDs, have each one on a different vlan, and then control services provided to that vlan. For example, I'll dump all IOT crap onto a vlan that doesn't have internet access.I'm still not 100% sure it will work (the hardware still hasn't arrived). But finally, to answer your question: "Yes!"Holy crap, give me official hardware. I installed DD-WRT on my linsys router. It's been so long that I don't remember exact details, but the process was INTIMIDATING. I felt like I had to download a blob from a website that wasn't the official website (ie: I seem to recall different people building DD-WRT for different hardware). I also recall some features not being available on some hardware.Give me the hardware that is sold by the people that work on the project!I want some reassurance that I have the "most supported hardware", so I don't have to go through huge feature matrices to see if my hardware supports feature X.I want headroom to install new packages. I don't want to have so little space that I need to remove one package to install another.And finally, I want the people writing the software to GET PAID, because I want it to still be around... and being actively developed 10 years from now.PS:I initially wanted to get a consumer grade switch, but my network operator friends told me that was a terrible idea... and that I should get a use Cisco switch on Ebay. Cisco is probably great and network operators love it... but holy crap... trying to figure out what switch to buy is an enormous pain in the a$$. I pushed my friends, they relented and said: "Mikrotik is also great". I went to their website. 1000 times better than Cisco's; their switches were cheaper. I didn't have to "call for a quote" or scour Ebay. I haven't turned it on yet, but the buying experience was so much better.
• Menu

  rekabis
  IMHO, those who want a router with open-source firmware are going to have the technical knowledge to do the finding and flashing themselves, by virtue of being embedded in tech deeply enough to recognize the value of an open-source firmware in the first place.Those who look at you blankly when you mention open-source router firmware aren’t likely going to become customers.
• t1234s
  maybe preinstalled but easily able to overwrite with a downloaded version from dd-wrt as no one should trust preinstalled firmware on these devices.
• timmit
  I got this idea too. To sell the openwrt preinstalled routers.
• Menu

  movsx
  How does DD-WRT compare to RouterOS?
• alexnewman
  I used to use pfsense and openwrt and stuff but now with Claude I just use a custom Linux distribution running on a dell 2u. That being said I have 25 gbps of internet across 5 internet providers (puerto Rico) and that plugs into my internal home network running at 2x 25 gbps . So for savings it’s like two quad 10 gbps cards. I’ve found substantial speed advantages via consumer hardware considering the cross sectional bandwidth is like 70 gbps
• stackghost
  Thinkpenguin used to sell Rosewill routers that came with a particular Linux installed, but their value add was no proprietary blobs, everything open source and FSF certified IIRC.
• ssl-3
  I used to use DD-WRT, and Tomato, and Shibby's mod of Tomato, and Advanced Tomato, and other stuff. Somewhere, I'm sure I still have a WRT54GS that I hacked ~20 years ago to accept SD cards. It was a fun time in using inexpensive hardware in unintended ways.At one point, and I don't remember exactly when, I just started using OpenWRT instead. It wasn't always the case, but it presents a very usable GUI straight away these days and it has a ton of flexibility for getting creative later.At home I run it on a Pi4 that I bought for the purpose. It keeps up with my 500/20Mbps DOCSIS internet very well indeed. I've used it with a USB NIC to get dedicated ports, and also with VLANs and a managed switch instead. I just download and flash the card, plug stuff in, and configure it. No real issues -- for years, now. (Wireless is provided by Mikrotik access points.)When something faster happens in my neighborhood (which may be very soon; I had a very brief chat with a dude whose fiber splicing trailer was parked across the street just yesterday), I'll probably want to move to something more capable.That could be in the form of faster Pi, or an old PC running OPNsense -- or even stick with OpenWRT. No big deal.If I really wanted a tidier package for light-weight travel or something, then I guess I'd pick something appropriate from glinet and put an official OpenWRT image on it.For heavier-travel, I've got a kit with a Pi4, a managed PoE switch, and a backup Mikrotik box (that can be a switch or a router; it runs OpenWRT as well and the normal config is that it just provides more switch ports), and all this stuff is mounted onto a 1U rack shelf that is in-turn inside of a road case. It's meant to be physically durable and to include enough gear that if any part of it dies then I can replace that functionality Right Now without spending time finding parts in the middle of nowhere.So, no: I would not buy one that was prefabulated. It wouldn't scratch my itch.---For everyone else? Honestly, the regular folks I know who ask me questions about networking aren't into that stuff at all or they wouldn't be asking. They don't care about ultimate speeds, or latency under load, or any of those things. They don't care about running Internet services from their network, or services on their local network, and probably don't even have a printer to abuse if something goes awry. They're also not interested in exploring the bowels of their home to install cabling for PoE access points.They just want decent-enough wifi coverage that they don't have to think about it, and then: They want to succeed at not thinking about it.So for those folks, I've come to recommend proprietary multi-node mesh systems. It doesn't really matter to me which one it is, or how terrible some aspect or other is: They all tend to check the right boxes, they update themselves, and then: Nobody thinks about them.
• Menu

  PunchyHamster
  Nope. I want one with OpenWRTalso> 4. used terminal PC, they go for cheap. Just add ethernet usb card for second linkalso> 5. plenty of small form factor multiple ethernet boards you can get on ARM and even x86, tho gonna be more expensive than a dedicated router
• rootsudo
  50/50This is not a new idea.Several companies/single owner LLC's do this for a massively inflated price.I understand why the inflated price, support and warranties, etc.IT is not that hard for people who are technically inclined.People who are not into it don't understand why.If placement/marketing was for SMB that wanted to maximize dd-wrt usage and get a support contract in place I can see thatbut outside of that, and a marketing youtube channel and being proactive on reddit, Idk how much can it scale and what point will you not get a cease and desist from vendors because I'm sure they have something nasty in their terms of service, which I think you may need to click through to enable the flash.You've identified your market competiton price points, and all have deeper pockets than you, but do not offer free, open source software.WRT3200ACM and the other previous model is a fab of mine to grab, it's been a year but I've collected 10+ and deploeyd them in strategic places for personal use,You wouldn't need regulatory approval IMO. prototyping, what type? You'd follow the release schedule, get the best flavors/models and support those.Overtime maybe you'd contribute back to the project, especially during hardware revisions. But it is very different from buying used hardware from ebay and flashing it to resell vs buying new and selling it as a value add on.1. Yes, proper hacker route.2. Proper route to an extent, it legitmiazes support, warranty and security.3. Expensive, time consuming but, doable but not likely.Yeah, the dropbox comment is infamous, but that was about launching a new SAAS that has infinite potential scale and solved a problem no one really wanted to fix at the time outside of one drive (which sucked at the time, was called skydrive afaik) and usb sticks which are...great but USB3 was new, usb2 was there and people were arguing back and forth why usb3 wasn't working or suchso:to answer your question you need to really figure out a basic marketing question of 3 P's.Product Price Placement.Product is DD-WRT. Price: It's free. Placement: People that know what it is but don't have free time to install it?No, not quite right, right? Let's try again:Product: DD-WRT routers preconfigured for enterprise support and SMB. Price: Retail price of router + $100 per sold, with 1 yr warranty, additional warranty and stuff available at x and y? Placement: People that know what it is about but don't have free time ot install it or want to offshore this for a price.Slightly better, but still:So do I want it? I welcome anything FOSS in general w/ GNU/Linux and its a much needed stepping stone to continue having a decentralized internet:but if it was so easy, people would've done it already, and they do.It also reminds me of fontana which is how I netted a free WRT54G for offering what exactly, I don't know, but boy did I flash DD-wrt on that badboy and link it to my neighbors WiFi for free roadrunner internet to get my anime fansubs. So while as much as I'd like for the idea to flourish/am surprised wardriving and torrenting anime was a vector for getting me into tech I don't see it much out of a hobby businessand that is 100% OKIf you throw $5-10k a year at it, I think you can corner the niche, use AI automaiton for marketing campaigns, target tech conventions/festivals (like VCF) and youtube to build a audience it can scale.but 125k? wow, no way - you ccan really do this for much less.back to the scope of a opensource router: same as above, but if you really want, you need to find a manufacturer that already has a pre built configuration that at minimum supports the newest radio and minimum gigabit ethernet. GLI has theirs at $169, and hardware is a miminmal markup business, you can really find something similar to that and do a proper hardware cycle with a manufacturer and somewhat a contract but thats 50K including FCC licensing (if you know what to do, and you do the licensing yoruself, as well as Electrek/uL to cover CSPC. But hey, in todays world, everyone (well for past 30 years too) just makes it up and folds thier llc when caught.For more business minded ideas, heres one about MSO/s and GLP1 from a Ycombinator 3x foudner and I comment with the same dissent:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49543849So tl;dr why not pitch it for ycombinator winter, I think it's still open for submissions.Add AI (why not, right?) and you can have a walking talking configuratuion wizard guide you to addung ublock,adblock, pihole, etc instead of the broken ecosystem we have today within dd-wrt because while I clearly can spot the pain points and issues, I lack the ability to turn them into viable selling points for investors to give me money and I should fix that someday :(
• waymarkhq
  [flagged]
• dw9414877
  [dead]
• anon
  undefined
• 1970-01-01
  Ddwrt is a joke today. I would pay to have it go away forever or finally become mature and not be forever in beta.