<- Back
Comments (52)
- whatever1Omg! My whole life I thought that the rear engine articulated buses transferred the torque to the middle axle (the rear axle of the front “bus”)!
- happytoexplainI like watching the other half of the bus while riding these. It's a cool effect, seeing the whole "room" oscillate through the "doorway", while I feel like I'm standing still.Edit: The article has a video of this effect near the bottom.
- netsharcJust 2 days ago: one of these buses had an accident that left the front part twisted 180 degrees in relation to the rear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flbaRmGKzPYThe Munich bus-trailer in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IUE-yA8R1A
- adrianmonkWhen I got to where they explained the benefits of having the engine at the very back and the instability of having the back part push the front, I tried to guess how they solved it. I guessed a fancy drive shaft with universal joints so the engine in the back half could drive wheels in the front half.I guessed wrong. I still like my idea, but their solution is simpler and probably more efficient and more durable too.
- myself248This article's byline features one of the most magnificent cases of nominative determinism I've ever seen. I wonder if it's a nom de plume.
- anArbitraryOneI relate more to the inarticulate bus
- Reason077> “The articulated bus is a common sight everywhere”Certainly not in London where they were famously banned in 2009.Now days they’re uncommon throughout the UK, with UK cities having a preference for double-deckers. You do see them in use as shuttles at some UK airports, though.
- bell-cotCall me a fossil, but double-decker busses just seem so much cooler. Without all the added engineering complexity, costs, and footprint.
- lowbloodsugarUnfuckingreadable.
- gattisdouble length bus has to be one of dumbest ideas i've ever seen. jams up a whole block every time it tries to turn. usually at least half empty and not helping anything. double decker. brits figured it out already.