HN

Comments (73)

• Menu

  dylan604
  Anyone that's never had the (dis)pleasure of working with tapes, there's some gotchas to know about before archiving and forgetting about it.When you create an archive, do not skip the step of reading it back. I'm not talking about just having the system confirm it is readable. I mean actually restoring the data from the tape. I've had tapes fail to retrieve data off of the tape even though the writing app confirmed it was readable.Drives can have issues reading data written by another drive. Drives can have issues reading a tape it wrote itself.Why write one when you can write two at twice the time/cost? In all of my experience with tape, I've never written just one tape. In the early days of DVDs, the images were written to LTO to send to have the discs pressed. Two were always sent on the chance one wasn't readable and schedules were so tight that the loss of a couple of days to send a new tape would wreck delivery dates. Another facility wrote three tapes: one kept on site, one sent to IronMountain, one sent to the client directly. Plenty of occasions saw the local copy unreadable and the IronMountain copy was retrieved. These were managed by large robotic tape libraries so each tape was written in a different drive at the same time so it was 3x cost while only 1x time.Use the drive cleaning cassette as recommended. Your dirty heads can cause the data to not be written/read correctly depending on which head is dirty. If you're having issues reading, clean the heads before giving up on the tape. If you're having issues reading a tape just written, do not think someone else will be able to read it.Ensure whoever might be using a tape you've written understands what was used to write the tape. Not all archivers are compatible. If you use the tar command to write to tape, people using a GUI app won't be able to read it.
• Isamu
  Tape is a fascinating technology, I recall reading the account of the SONY cofounder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_Japan:_Akio_Morita_and... and the crazy things they were trying to make their own tape media because they had no supply because of the war. They were ultimately successful in creating a compact tape machine but they had to build up their expertise in tape media from literally nothing.
• Menu

  amelius
  Why can't they make an attractively priced pro-sumer tape drive solution?
• Menu

  doughnutstracks
  I came across this website that provides LTO tape pricing references (I have no affiliation with the site).LTO-10 30TB: $259–$300 per cartridge (~$8.63–$10/TB) LTO-10 40TB: $491–$555 per cartridge (~$12.28–$13.88/TB) LTO-9 18TB: $92–$129 per cartridge (~$5.14–$7.17/TB)https://tapebackup.org/lto-tape-price-trend/lto10-priceOne thing worth noting is that the tape cartridges themselves aren't necessarily the biggest expense. Standalone LTO-10 drives are currently listed at around $25,000.
• 10729287
  As if they weren't already sitting on a big enough pile of cash with Instax. Damn Fujifilm, always in the best plans.
• Menu

  rickdeckard
  There might be a huge potential for an AI which scrapes your (and my!) data and concludes what I can safely delete, saving the world tons of resources.The millions of pictures I never got to sort, the multiple versions of a file that I wrote 2 years ago, etc.But in the view of an AI-company that's probably a paradox. All this data is charged and could be used to learn more about me, it should never be deleted! Instead, some hole should be carved out of a mountain to store it, billing me every month!
• MaxFree
  Fujifilm is pretty clearly trying to sell shovels in this market bubble. I haven't read the latest, but I would suspect their clientele has moved from cloud backups to AI training data, and they need to make a big show and dance of ramping production to join the bubble.
• Menu

  drdexebtjl
  Surely it’s AI, and not harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks, right?
• metadata
  All the data AI vendors are slurping to surveil us needs to be stored for later, when they get enough compute to start taking advantage of it.As time goes by, people are sending more and more. It started with just prompts, then the local source code, then calendar, emails, local files...
• Menu

  rickdeckard
  it's fascinating how the general direction became to never delete data. All the attempts of taking a photo, all the downloads of bank-statements, all the useless emails.At some point in the future the amount of data being stored indiscriminately must consume such a huge amount of resources and cost, that it becomes a hidden fixed cost within a country's GDP, without any tangible benefit...
• sneak
  Still an open question: How does S3 Glacier Deep Archive do it? Tape has been theorized but I’ve also heard arguments for very slow flash…
• Menu

  dzink
  BluRay M-Disks are cheaper and more resistant to humidity / heat.
• rowanG077
  I have worked in tape for years. We can really tell there is a big boom after years of the market not doing super well.
• wazoox
  Shameless plug : for those who plan to try out tapes, time to re-post my blog article "Managing tape drives and libraries with the Unix/Linux CLI" :)https://blogs.intellique.com/tech/2022/01/27#TapeCLI
• pjc50
  The cost of backing up slop gets added to the cost of generating it in the first place, I suppose.
• classified
  I would have thought this is for archiving pre-slop-era data, but archiving slop might be archaeologically interesting too.
• Menu

  rickdeckard
  I don't understand, why don't these companies backup their data into the cloud? /sThat's what they keep telling everyone else for years now...