HN

Comments (101)

• Menu

  chmod775
  Most of my YouTube playlists say something like "15 unavailable videos are hidden", or about ~10% for a 5 years old playlist. The same ratio holds true for most bookmarks of YouTube videos I have.There's videos from ~15 years ago that I consider gone for good - lost to the great copyright apocalypse - having been unable to find them anywhere on the today's internet.
• Menu

  weinzierl
  Downloading your favourite stuff is absolutely what you should do, but it doesn't solve the bigger problem.Many from my generation, who grew up during an era of information scarcity, have huge stashes of hoarded data. But what can we do with it? There is no way to legally share it, so we take it with us in our graves.EDIT: Many good comments, but they all suffer from one blind spot, so I answer here instead of individually.A lot of content is only legal because it is on YouTube (or any other platform that has deals with the content industry). Sure, we can share illegally in a way that is obscure enough that no one gets sued. But what help is that, eventually it will get either popular and sued out of existence or forgotten and fade.Then there is old content that is not legally shareable at all, like old game ROMs. Plenty of millennial stuff there but the Gen-X world is already half forgotten.Cooyright is just too long and too unreliable. What we need at least is exemptions from Copyright for archivists, otherwise a lot of stuff will simply be lost in the coming decades.
• jerjerjer
  > ytdl-sub> This is the only yt-dlp wrapper that allowed me to properly maintain the Playlist structure to any extentI have the same requirement and it's possible to do it with the default yt-dlp:yt-dlp --embed-metadata --parse-metadata "playlist_index:%(track_number)s" "PLAYLIST_URL"
• Menu

  EvanAnderson
  I agree with the sentiment (and have several TB of archived Youtube videos) but I can't help but think "Keep this on the down-low!". I feel the same way every time someone mentions Youtube RSS feeds (which drive my archiving rig). Keep quiet or they'll take them away!
• walruskhan
  Many of my "Watch Later" playlist items have been removed, which is why I currently:1. Vibed a firefox extension that polls my youtube watch later list and saves as bookmarks2. Vibed a second firefox extension that syncs bookmarks to a self-hosted karakeep (bookmark manager)3. Configured karakeep to download videos from youtube bookmarks (it uses yt-dlp internally).It's pretty nifty.
• Menu

  settsu
  But also? Let things die. Let them languish half-remembered for years until they're gone forever. (Until they're not and then are again.) Let things go. What's that, your 'tism won't let you? Learn to. Grow. (Is that effectively impossible for some? Sure. But clearly that's a different problem. If you're reading this, most likely you can accomplish it.) I'm glad we have the Internet Archive and all those amazing things. But I'm convinced that just because it is technologically possible to personally save everything forever, it is in most cases entirely unnecessary and probably ultimately unhealthy.
• Menu

  vagab0nd
  I have a nightly job that looks at all my youtube playlists, and downloads them to disk. It also sends me an email whenever a video that I haven't watched becomes unavailable so I can watch the local version. It took about 2 days to setup, but probably 30 minutes with AI today.
• Menu

  prologic
  One of the things I wish I could solve better, was a way to search for and show decent search results that you could then pipe into `yt-dlp`. Every method of doing this I've seen is basically a "hack" and often breaks or doesn't work at all. Anyone have a better solution to this that lets you basically build a frontend/proxy to Youtube or lets you Search, Show results and Download what you want to see lateR?
• Menu

  zabriel_goss
  In addition to what's included in the post, I'll recommend Tube Archivist as a self-hosted solution. Utilizes yt-dlp, you can configure download speeds to avoid getting temporarily blocked, handles subscriptions and playlists. I've been enjoying it!
• Teslazar
  I'm using the External Application Button browser extension along with yt-dlp so that I can download YT videos with a single click. https://webextension.org/listing/external-application-button...My arguments line for the extension looks something like this: /C C:\Users\[user]\youtube-dl\yt-dlp.exe -v -P "D:\Media\Videos" -f "bv*[vcodec!*=av01]+ba/b" --write-subs --embed-subs --sub-langs "en.\*" --compat-options no-keep-subs --merge-output-format mkv [HREF]
• Menu

  mulemisterX
  The other year I came to the same conclusion so I built a web frontend for yt-dlp with queue support. I have 'profiles' that I can pick from at the time of download that allow custom yt-dlp configs to be active at any given time, which routes videos to different locations and jellyfin being one of those locations.
• sampo
  Around 2018, someone had done a lot of work and there were videos like "The Adventures of Tyrion the Imp (Season 1)" in Youtube. They had taken all Tyrion's storyline scenes from all the episodes, and put them together in one video. And they had done these for all of the Game of Thrones main characters, so there were lots of these videos.At some point, all those videos were removed.
• Menu

  numpad0
  fyi: filesystems have max path length/byte count limits, and yt-dlp can exceed that(e.g. "/var/home/username/Documents/Videos/YouTube/Five-reasons-you-want-powdered-detergents-for-your-dishwasher-fourth-one-surprises-you.mp4.part.012" > $THE_MAX_LEN). If this happens, it throws a Python `[Errno 36] File name too long` error and yt-dlp gives up.This can be mitigated by adding `-o "%(title).150B [%(id)s].%(ext)s" ` to command line, which trims filenames to 150 bytes max. There are other options like --trim-filenames, but yt-dlp don't apply those to the interim part files and that triggers the failure anyway. The relevant issue has been reported on GH years ago and closed by the maintaining author with no PR from me(hey).
• Menu

  laweijfmvo
  just fyi, youtube premium lite is $7.99 a month (subscribe via web, not App store), removes in-video ads and allows downloads. at that price it’s just worth it for me.
• Menu

  tombert
  I regret not archiving all the videos from the youtuber Myles Power (pseudoscience-debunker). He was one of my more favorite YouTubers but a few years ago he nuked his entire channel and all the videos on it (I suspect because his employer didn't like him arguing with people on the internet).I wanted to rewatch some of his videos recently and as far as I can tell most of his videos are now lost media. I should have downloaded them when I had the chance.
• globular-toast
  I've been saying this for ages: if you care about something, seek your own copy.
• allexsendev
  Read the comments and combined with my personal experience, made me wanna have a full on offline library, and in a better case, "decentralized" libraries of such things, although at the very least videos prolly won't work all that well.
• mococa
  I've been (manually) download my favourite youtube videos to my cloud since I've noticed some videos gone forever for any reasons.
• EGreg
  There is a solution to this for videos you upload from now on. The problem is decoupling persistence and access. Imagine a decentralized network where you could “pin” videos the way you do in IPFS, but they’d be streamed and end-to-end encrypted.Websites could ask their visitors to keep a tab open and their browsers will automatically store chunks (and earn safebux for serving videos, if they want to turn that on). This was designed to be far simpler than IPFS, with no “sealing” … just open a browser tab and get paid.https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/06/19/safecloud-browser...It works now, you can try it locally:https://github.com/Safebots/SafecloudThe real interesting part is when it connects with Safebox remote attestation. Here you can prove that the server has not been compromised, and that together with HTTPS proves that the JS is official. You don’t need men with guns for DRM or copyright… you can enforce it this way. An individual user might hack the JS they got but someone else can’t distribute the hack at scale (unless it is with a rogue jailbroken browser). The Jets in safecloud wouldn’t release the chunks unless there was a recent assertion + TPM attestation from the Safebox serving the player iframe.This way you can enforce revenue streams like “pay per minute” and have the client side actually enforce it for nearly all users.@tptacek you would love Safecloud I think
• Menu

  mvdtnz
  Does anyone have a better solution for watching this stuff on my TV? I'm not thrilled with using Jellyfin for this purpose because of the limitations (some in the article, others not) but also because I have a lovely Jellyfin library of actual TV and movies that I don't want to gum up.Ideally I want videos on my home server organised into arbitrary folders and a nice simple video player on my Android TV that I can browse the folder tree with. Just like the old days. I don't care about accessing this stuff outside of my home network.
• jon128
  Somewhere in early 2013 some ethical hacker communities had tooling to share the hashes and general metadata of downloaded videos from Youtube so that "spy marks" could be detected.At the time I was already concerned that what would later be called deep fakes would be abused by big sites to mass-manipulate the bifurcated segments of the larger population in near real-time. At that time in 2013 I was told I must be smoking some really good shit, and perhaps I was.But now in 2026 about twelve years after Google's primitive artificial neural networks showed us an on-silicon view of tripping balls in a grocery store, and now the mediocre enthusiasts both technical and not are no longer like "oh yeah that's cool man" but has been exposed to what artificial neural networks are doing day to day, the concern for targeted convincing-as-totally highly manipulative edits of hour long podcasts is not so "out there". https://brand.io/article/spymarks/ Pouff - Grocery Trip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgPaCWJL7XI
• Menu

  dSebastien
  I've always downloaded entire YT channels I enjoyed. I now have free/forever access to tons of content that now sits behind paywalls on topics I care about.All automated for years
• Menu

  ryankrage77
  Rather than using Tdarr, wouldn't it be simpler to use yt-dlp's `--recode-video` option?
• lylarius1
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jktuzvxRSNE
• shevy-java
  I did so with regards from Tales from the crypt; the early seasons were great, so I have them locally. Or, at the least the better ones; some are not so good.For this purpose I also kept list, in .yml files, for the most recent URL. Not just on youtube but also dailymotion etc...Interestingly there are some surges of URLs suddenly being eliminated. Naturally we know the copyright mafia is trying to hinder us, the people here, but it is interesting how that works. Because ... it sometimes works. And then it does not work. Which is quite strange to me.For instance, you can often still find new videos on youtube here, even full movies. Sometimes you can download them; then suddenly they are gone, but they were up before that for months or even years. So it is really really strange to see some videos suddenly vanishing, others being around for decades literally. Even when you'd assume these have ... "copyright issues".
• tchoedak90
  Lol would love to sue this to download some of the movies on youtube
• hsuduebc2
  >The corporate internet is hostile to art and the things you loveAgreed. I mourn the deletion of legendary Hair cake video from FilthyFrank every now and then. But at least we have AI slop videos or in better case videos with "The inevitable rise and fall of XXX" title" with human narrator reading AI written script. But hey at least everyone censor word fck and sht.
• j45
  Backing up videos seems increasingly a consideration, it's disappointing to see videos I've organized and paid for via Youtube Premium to support creators and invest in organizing meaningful playlists.
• anon
  undefined
• Menu

  superkuh
  Every time you watch a youtube video you are downloading the youtube video to disk. It is just to prevent the lawyers from exploding that we all pretend that deleting it afterword means it never was downloaded.But yes, everyone should be not deleting the videos they've downloaded.
• Menu

  yh11
  Is this another yt-dlp wrapper?